LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>,
	Jaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@gmail.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	Jaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@samsung.com>,
	m.szyprowski@samsung.com, ytk.lee@samsung.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] usb: host: xhci: allow __GFP_FS in dma allocation
Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 07:23:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190520142331.GA12108@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1905201011490.1498-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>

On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 10:16:57AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> What if the allocation requires the kernel to swap some old pages out 
> to the backing store, but the backing store is on the device that the 
> driver is managing?  The swap can't take place until the current I/O 
> operation is complete (assuming the driver can handle only one I/O 
> operation at a time), and the current operation can't complete until 
> the old pages are swapped out.  Result: deadlock.
> 
> Isn't that the whole reason for using GFP_NOIO in the first place?

It is, or rather was.  As it has been incredibly painful to wire
up the gfp_t argument through some callstacks, most notably the
vmalloc allocator which is used by a lot of the DMA allocators on
non-coherent platforms, we now have the memalloc_noio_save and
memalloc_nofs_save functions that mark a thread as not beeing to
go into I/O / FS reclaim.  So even if you use GFP_KERNEL you will
not dip into reclaim with those flags set on the thread.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-20 14:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-17 16:02 Jaewon Kim
2019-05-17 16:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-05-18  1:53   ` Jaewon Kim
2019-05-20  5:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-20  9:09   ` Oliver Neukum
2019-05-20 10:12     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-20 14:16       ` Alan Stern
2019-05-20 14:23         ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2019-05-21  8:54           ` Oliver Neukum
2019-05-21 13:27             ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-21 13:11         ` Oliver Neukum
2019-05-21 14:00           ` Alan Stern
2019-05-22  6:31             ` Oliver Neukum
2019-05-22 14:56               ` Alan Stern
2019-05-22 20:47                 ` Oliver Neukum
2019-05-23 14:01                   ` Alan Stern
2019-05-28 12:34                     ` Oliver Neukum
2019-05-28 14:25                       ` Alan Stern
2019-05-23 12:32   ` Oliver Neukum
2019-05-23 16:35     ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190520142331.GA12108@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jaewon31.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=jaewon31.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=oneukum@suse.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=ytk.lee@samsung.com \
    --subject='Re: [RFC PATCH] usb: host: xhci: allow __GFP_FS in dma allocation' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).