LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Cc: wsa@the-dreams.de, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com, jbroadus@gmail.com,
	patches@opensource.cirrus.com,
	Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] i2c: core: Move ACPI IRQ handling to probe time
Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 14:27:28 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190521112728.GX2781@lahna.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190520084936.10590-4-ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>

On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 09:49:34AM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote:
> Bring the ACPI path in sync with the device tree path and handle all the
> IRQ fetching at probe time. This leaves the only IRQ handling at device
> registration time being that which is passed directly through the board
> info as either a resource or an actual IRQ number.

I don't see issues with this approach. Cc'd Jarkko and Andy just in case
I missed something.

One minor stylistic comment, see below.

> Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
> ---
>  drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c | 6 ++----
>  drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c | 6 +++++-
>  drivers/i2c/i2c-core.h      | 7 +++++++
>  3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c
> index 764cd10420a74..e332760bf9ebc 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c
> @@ -148,8 +148,9 @@ static int i2c_acpi_add_resource(struct acpi_resource *ares, void *data)
>  	return 1; /* No need to add resource to the list */
>  }
>  
> -static int i2c_acpi_get_irq(struct acpi_device *adev, int *irq)
> +int i2c_acpi_get_irq(struct i2c_client *client, int *irq)
>  {
> +	struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(&client->adapter->dev);
>  	struct list_head resource_list;
>  	int ret;
>  
> @@ -201,9 +202,6 @@ static int i2c_acpi_get_info(struct acpi_device *adev,
>  	if (adapter_handle)
>  		*adapter_handle = lookup.adapter_handle;
>  
> -	/* Then fill IRQ number if any */
> -	i2c_acpi_get_irq(adev, &info->irq);
> -
>  	acpi_set_modalias(adev, dev_name(&adev->dev), info->type,
>  			  sizeof(info->type));
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> index 84bf11b25a120..c1afa17a76bfc 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> @@ -335,7 +335,11 @@ static int i2c_device_probe(struct device *dev)
>  			if (irq == -EINVAL || irq == -ENODATA)
>  				irq = of_irq_get(dev->of_node, 0);
>  		} else if (ACPI_COMPANION(dev)) {
> -			irq = acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get(ACPI_COMPANION(dev), 0);
> +			i2c_acpi_get_irq(client, &irq);
> +
> +			if (irq == -ENOENT)
> +				irq = acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get(ACPI_COMPANION(dev),
> +							    0);

I think this looks better if you put everything one line:

				irq = acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get(ACPI_COMPANION(dev), 0);

>  		}
>  		if (irq == -EPROBE_DEFER)
>  			return irq;
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.h b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.h
> index 8f3a08dc73a25..6bec145ab7d74 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.h
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.h
> @@ -72,6 +72,8 @@ const struct acpi_device_id *
>  i2c_acpi_match_device(const struct acpi_device_id *matches,
>  		      struct i2c_client *client);
>  void i2c_acpi_register_devices(struct i2c_adapter *adap);
> +
> +int i2c_acpi_get_irq(struct i2c_client *client, int *irq);
>  #else /* CONFIG_ACPI */
>  static inline void i2c_acpi_register_devices(struct i2c_adapter *adap) { }
>  static inline const struct acpi_device_id *
> @@ -80,6 +82,11 @@ i2c_acpi_match_device(const struct acpi_device_id *matches,
>  {
>  	return NULL;
>  }
> +
> +static inline int i2c_acpi_get_irq(struct i2c_client *client, int *irq)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
>  #endif /* CONFIG_ACPI */
>  extern struct notifier_block i2c_acpi_notifier;
>  
> -- 
> 2.11.0

  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-21 11:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-20  8:49 [PATCH 0/5] I2C IRQ Probe Improvements Charles Keepax
2019-05-20  8:49 ` [PATCH 1/5] i2c: acpi: Factor out getting the IRQ from ACPI Charles Keepax
2019-05-21 11:17   ` Mika Westerberg
2019-05-20  8:49 ` [PATCH 2/5] i2c: acpi: Use available IRQ helper functions Charles Keepax
2019-05-20  8:49 ` [PATCH 3/5] i2c: core: Move ACPI IRQ handling to probe time Charles Keepax
2019-05-21 11:27   ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2019-05-21 12:57     ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-05-21 13:11       ` Charles Keepax
2019-05-21 13:20         ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-05-20  8:49 ` [PATCH 4/5] i2c: core: Move ACPI gpio IRQ handling into i2c_acpi_get_irq Charles Keepax
2019-05-21 11:37   ` Mika Westerberg
2019-05-20  8:49 ` [PATCH 5/5] i2c: core: Tidy up handling of init_irq Charles Keepax
2019-05-21 15:04 [PATCH 0/5] I2C IRQ Probe Improvements Charles Keepax
2019-05-21 15:05 ` [PATCH 3/5] i2c: core: Move ACPI IRQ handling to probe time Charles Keepax
2019-05-21 17:18   ` Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190521112728.GX2781@lahna.fi.intel.com \
    --to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
    --cc=ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com \
    --cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jbroadus@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=patches@opensource.cirrus.com \
    --cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 3/5] i2c: core: Move ACPI IRQ handling to probe time' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).