LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Cc: wsa@the-dreams.de, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com, jbroadus@gmail.com,
patches@opensource.cirrus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] i2c: core: Move ACPI gpio IRQ handling into i2c_acpi_get_irq
Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 14:37:01 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190521113701.GY2781@lahna.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190520084936.10590-5-ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 09:49:35AM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote:
> It makes sense to contain all the ACPI IRQ handling in a single helper
> function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
> ---
>
> Note that this one is somewhat interesting, it seems the search
> through the resource list is done against the companion device
> of the adapter but the GPIO search is done against the companion
> device of the client. It feels to me like these really should
> be done on the same device, and certainly this is what SPI
> does (both against the equivalent of the adapter). Perhaps
> someone with more ACPI knowledge than myself could comment?
What GPIO search you mean? I did not find any ACPI specific GPIO lookup
in the i2c-core-acpi/base files.
> Thanks,
> Charles
>
> drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c | 3 +++
> drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c | 4 ----
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c
> index e332760bf9ebc..0c882d956e9a4 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c
> @@ -164,6 +164,9 @@ int i2c_acpi_get_irq(struct i2c_client *client, int *irq)
Maybe worth adding kernel-doc explaining what the function does if it
does not have already.
>
> acpi_dev_free_resource_list(&resource_list);
>
> + if (*irq < 0)
> + *irq = acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get(ACPI_COMPANION(&client->dev), 0);
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> index c1afa17a76bfc..f958b50c78c04 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> @@ -336,10 +336,6 @@ static int i2c_device_probe(struct device *dev)
> irq = of_irq_get(dev->of_node, 0);
> } else if (ACPI_COMPANION(dev)) {
> i2c_acpi_get_irq(client, &irq);
I think we should check and handle possible error here.
> -
> - if (irq == -ENOENT)
> - irq = acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get(ACPI_COMPANION(dev),
> - 0);
> }
> if (irq == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> return irq;
> --
> 2.11.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-21 11:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-20 8:49 [PATCH 0/5] I2C IRQ Probe Improvements Charles Keepax
2019-05-20 8:49 ` [PATCH 1/5] i2c: acpi: Factor out getting the IRQ from ACPI Charles Keepax
2019-05-21 11:17 ` Mika Westerberg
2019-05-20 8:49 ` [PATCH 2/5] i2c: acpi: Use available IRQ helper functions Charles Keepax
2019-05-20 8:49 ` [PATCH 3/5] i2c: core: Move ACPI IRQ handling to probe time Charles Keepax
2019-05-21 11:27 ` Mika Westerberg
2019-05-21 12:57 ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-05-21 13:11 ` Charles Keepax
2019-05-21 13:20 ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-05-20 8:49 ` [PATCH 4/5] i2c: core: Move ACPI gpio IRQ handling into i2c_acpi_get_irq Charles Keepax
2019-05-21 11:37 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2019-05-20 8:49 ` [PATCH 5/5] i2c: core: Tidy up handling of init_irq Charles Keepax
2019-05-21 15:04 [PATCH 0/5] I2C IRQ Probe Improvements Charles Keepax
2019-05-21 15:05 ` [PATCH 4/5] i2c: core: Move ACPI gpio IRQ handling into i2c_acpi_get_irq Charles Keepax
2019-05-21 17:27 ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-05-22 8:19 ` Charles Keepax
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190521113701.GY2781@lahna.fi.intel.com \
--to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
--cc=ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=jbroadus@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
--subject='Re: [PATCH 4/5] i2c: core: Move ACPI gpio IRQ handling into i2c_acpi_get_irq' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).