LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Linux Containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [REVIEW][PATCH 17/26] signal/arm: Remove tsk parameter from __do_user_fault
Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 19:39:07 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190523003916.20726-18-ebiederm@xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190523003916.20726-1-ebiederm@xmission.com>

The __do_user_fault function is always called with tsk == current.
Make that obvious by removing the tsk parameter.

This makes it clear that __do_user_fault calls force_sig_fault
on the current task.

Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
---
 arch/arm/mm/fault.c | 11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm/mm/fault.c
index 58f69fa07df9..324def0279b2 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/fault.c
@@ -157,10 +157,11 @@ __do_kernel_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, unsigned int fsr,
  * User mode accesses just cause a SIGSEGV
  */
 static void
-__do_user_fault(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long addr,
-		unsigned int fsr, unsigned int sig, int code,
-		struct pt_regs *regs)
+__do_user_fault(unsigned long addr, unsigned int fsr, unsigned int sig,
+		int code, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
+	struct task_struct *tsk = current;
+
 	if (addr > TASK_SIZE)
 		harden_branch_predictor();
 
@@ -196,7 +197,7 @@ void do_bad_area(unsigned long addr, unsigned int fsr, struct pt_regs *regs)
 	 * have no context to handle this fault with.
 	 */
 	if (user_mode(regs))
-		__do_user_fault(tsk, addr, fsr, SIGSEGV, SEGV_MAPERR, regs);
+		__do_user_fault(addr, fsr, SIGSEGV, SEGV_MAPERR, regs);
 	else
 		__do_kernel_fault(mm, addr, fsr, regs);
 }
@@ -392,7 +393,7 @@ do_page_fault(unsigned long addr, unsigned int fsr, struct pt_regs *regs)
 			SEGV_ACCERR : SEGV_MAPERR;
 	}
 
-	__do_user_fault(tsk, addr, fsr, sig, code, regs);
+	__do_user_fault(addr, fsr, sig, code, regs);
 	return 0;
 
 no_context:
-- 
2.21.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-05-23  0:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-23  0:38 [REVIEW][PATCH 00/26] signal: Remove task argument from force_sig_info Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23  0:38 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 01/26] signal: Correct namespace fixups of si_pid and si_uid Eric W. Biederman
     [not found]   ` <20190529131503.F2AC221871@mail.kernel.org>
2019-05-29 15:18     ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23  0:38 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 02/26] signal/ptrace: Simplify and fix PTRACE_KILL Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-29 14:35   ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23  0:38 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 03/26] signal/arm64: Use force_sig not force_sig_fault for SIGKILL Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23 10:17   ` Will Deacon
2019-05-23 14:59     ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23 16:11     ` [REVIEW][PATCHv2 " Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23 16:15       ` Will Deacon
2019-05-23 20:59         ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-24 10:00           ` Will Deacon
2019-05-24 22:36             ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-29 15:12               ` Will Deacon
2019-05-29 15:34                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23 10:21   ` [REVIEW][PATCH " Dave Martin
2019-05-23 14:53     ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23 16:12       ` Dave P Martin
2019-05-23 21:00         ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23  0:38 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 04/26] signal/drbd: Use send_sig not force_sig Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23  0:38 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 05/26] signal/bpfilter: Fix bpfilter_kernl to use " Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23  0:38 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 06/26] signal/pid_namespace: Fix reboot_pid_ns " Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23  0:38 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 07/26] signal/cifs: Fix cifs_put_tcp_session to call send_sig instead of force_sig Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23  0:38 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 08/26] signal: Remove task parameter from force_sigsegv Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23  0:38 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 09/26] signal: Remove task parameter from force_sig Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23  0:39 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 10/26] signal: Remove task parameter from force_sig_mceerr Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23  0:39 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 11/26] signal/x86: Remove task parameter from send_sigtrap Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-28 18:18   ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-05-23  0:39 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 12/26] signal/um: " Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23  0:39 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 13/26] signal/sh: Remove tsk parameter from force_sig_info_fault Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23  0:39 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 14/26] signal/riscv: Remove tsk parameter from do_trap Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23  0:39 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 15/26] signal/nds32: Remove tsk parameter from send_sigtrap Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23  0:39 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 16/26] signal/arm: Remove tsk parameter from ptrace_break Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23  0:39 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2019-05-23  0:39 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 18/26] signal/unicore32: Remove tsk parameter from __do_user_fault Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23  0:39 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 19/26] signal: Explicitly call force_sig_fault on current Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23  0:39 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 20/26] signal: Use force_sig_fault_to_task for the two calls that don't deliver to current Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23  0:39 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 21/26] signal: Remove the task parameter from force_sig_fault Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23  0:39 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 22/26] signal: Properly set TRACE_SIGNAL_LOSE_INFO in __send_signal Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23  0:39 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 23/26] signal: Move the computation of force into send_signal and correct it Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23  0:39 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 24/26] signal: Generate the siginfo in force_sig Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23  0:39 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 25/26] signal: Factor force_sig_info_to_task out of force_sig_info Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23  0:39 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 26/26] signal: Remove the signal number and task parameters from force_sig_info Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-24 23:35 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 00/26] signal: Remove task argument " Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-29 15:37 ` Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190523003916.20726-18-ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --subject='Re: [REVIEW][PATCH 17/26] signal/arm: Remove tsk parameter from __do_user_fault' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).