LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Linux Containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [REVIEW][PATCH 02/26] signal/ptrace: Simplify and fix PTRACE_KILL
Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 19:38:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190523003916.20726-3-ebiederm@xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190523003916.20726-1-ebiederm@xmission.com>
Since PTRACE_KILL was introduced in 1.1.78 it has only worked if the
process is stopped in do_signal. On a ptraced but non-stopped process
PTRACE_KILL has always returned success and done nothing.
Separate the noop case of PTRACE_KILL from the case where it does
nothing. This fixes the fact that taking sighand lock in
ptrace_resume is not safe if the process could be in the middle of
exec or do_exit. The current test for child->state is insufficient to
prevent that race.
With the code explicitly implementing the noop people maintaining
ptrace no longer need to worry what happens in PTRACE_KILL if the
process is not stopped.
The alternative fix is to change the implementation of PTRACE_KILL
to just be send_sig(SIGKILL, child, 1); But I don't know if anything
depends on the current documented behavior.
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: b72c186999e6 ("ptrace: fix race between ptrace_resume() and wait_task_stopped()")
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
---
kernel/ptrace.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/ptrace.c b/kernel/ptrace.c
index 6f357f4fc859..5d6ff7040863 100644
--- a/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -212,15 +212,18 @@ static void ptrace_unfreeze_traced(struct task_struct *task)
*
* Check whether @child is being ptraced by %current and ready for further
* ptrace operations. If @ignore_state is %false, @child also should be in
- * %TASK_TRACED state and on return the child is guaranteed to be traced
- * and not executing. If @ignore_state is %true, @child can be in any
- * state.
+ * %TASK_TRACED state and on succesful return the child is guaranteed to be
+ * traced and not executing. If @ignore_state is %true, @child can be in
+ * any state on succesful return.
*
* CONTEXT:
* Grabs and releases tasklist_lock and @child->sighand->siglock.
*
* RETURNS:
- * 0 on success, -ESRCH if %child is not ready.
+ * 0 on success,
+ * -ESRCH if %child is not traced
+ * -EAGAIN if %child can not be frozen
+ * -EBUSY if the wait for %child fails
*/
static int ptrace_check_attach(struct task_struct *child, bool ignore_state)
{
@@ -240,6 +243,7 @@ static int ptrace_check_attach(struct task_struct *child, bool ignore_state)
* child->sighand can't be NULL, release_task()
* does ptrace_unlink() before __exit_signal().
*/
+ ret = -EAGAIN;
if (ignore_state || ptrace_freeze_traced(child))
ret = 0;
}
@@ -253,7 +257,7 @@ static int ptrace_check_attach(struct task_struct *child, bool ignore_state)
* so we should not worry about leaking __TASK_TRACED.
*/
WARN_ON(child->state == __TASK_TRACED);
- ret = -ESRCH;
+ ret = -EBUSY;
}
}
@@ -1074,8 +1078,6 @@ int ptrace_request(struct task_struct *child, long request,
return ptrace_resume(child, request, data);
case PTRACE_KILL:
- if (child->exit_state) /* already dead */
- return 0;
return ptrace_resume(child, request, SIGKILL);
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK
@@ -1147,14 +1149,17 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(ptrace, long, request, long, pid, unsigned long, addr,
goto out_put_task_struct;
}
- ret = ptrace_check_attach(child, request == PTRACE_KILL ||
- request == PTRACE_INTERRUPT);
- if (ret < 0)
- goto out_put_task_struct;
-
- ret = arch_ptrace(child, request, addr, data);
- if (ret || request != PTRACE_DETACH)
- ptrace_unfreeze_traced(child);
+ ret = ptrace_check_attach(child, request == PTRACE_INTERRUPT);
+ if (!ret) {
+ ret = arch_ptrace(child, request, addr, data);
+ if (ret || request != PTRACE_DETACH)
+ ptrace_unfreeze_traced(child);
+ }
+ /* PTRACE_KILL is a noop when not attached */
+ else if ((request == PTRACE_KILL) && (ret != -ESRCH))
+ ret = 0;
+ else
+ ret = -ESRCH;
out_put_task_struct:
put_task_struct(child);
@@ -1292,13 +1297,17 @@ COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE4(ptrace, compat_long_t, request, compat_long_t, pid,
goto out_put_task_struct;
}
- ret = ptrace_check_attach(child, request == PTRACE_KILL ||
- request == PTRACE_INTERRUPT);
+ ret = ptrace_check_attach(child, request == PTRACE_INTERRUPT);
if (!ret) {
ret = compat_arch_ptrace(child, request, addr, data);
if (ret || request != PTRACE_DETACH)
ptrace_unfreeze_traced(child);
}
+ /* PTRACE_KILL is a noop when not attached */
+ else if ((request == PTRACE_KILL) && (ret != -ESRCH))
+ ret = 0;
+ else
+ ret = -ESRCH;
out_put_task_struct:
put_task_struct(child);
--
2.21.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-23 0:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-23 0:38 [REVIEW][PATCH 00/26] signal: Remove task argument from force_sig_info Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23 0:38 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 01/26] signal: Correct namespace fixups of si_pid and si_uid Eric W. Biederman
[not found] ` <20190529131503.F2AC221871@mail.kernel.org>
2019-05-29 15:18 ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23 0:38 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2019-05-29 14:35 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 02/26] signal/ptrace: Simplify and fix PTRACE_KILL Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23 0:38 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 03/26] signal/arm64: Use force_sig not force_sig_fault for SIGKILL Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23 10:17 ` Will Deacon
2019-05-23 14:59 ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23 16:11 ` [REVIEW][PATCHv2 " Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23 16:15 ` Will Deacon
2019-05-23 20:59 ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-24 10:00 ` Will Deacon
2019-05-24 22:36 ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-29 15:12 ` Will Deacon
2019-05-29 15:34 ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23 10:21 ` [REVIEW][PATCH " Dave Martin
2019-05-23 14:53 ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23 16:12 ` Dave P Martin
2019-05-23 21:00 ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23 0:38 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 04/26] signal/drbd: Use send_sig not force_sig Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23 0:38 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 05/26] signal/bpfilter: Fix bpfilter_kernl to use " Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23 0:38 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 06/26] signal/pid_namespace: Fix reboot_pid_ns " Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23 0:38 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 07/26] signal/cifs: Fix cifs_put_tcp_session to call send_sig instead of force_sig Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23 0:38 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 08/26] signal: Remove task parameter from force_sigsegv Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23 0:38 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 09/26] signal: Remove task parameter from force_sig Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23 0:39 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 10/26] signal: Remove task parameter from force_sig_mceerr Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23 0:39 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 11/26] signal/x86: Remove task parameter from send_sigtrap Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-28 18:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-05-23 0:39 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 12/26] signal/um: " Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23 0:39 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 13/26] signal/sh: Remove tsk parameter from force_sig_info_fault Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23 0:39 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 14/26] signal/riscv: Remove tsk parameter from do_trap Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23 0:39 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 15/26] signal/nds32: Remove tsk parameter from send_sigtrap Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23 0:39 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 16/26] signal/arm: Remove tsk parameter from ptrace_break Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23 0:39 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 17/26] signal/arm: Remove tsk parameter from __do_user_fault Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23 0:39 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 18/26] signal/unicore32: " Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23 0:39 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 19/26] signal: Explicitly call force_sig_fault on current Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23 0:39 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 20/26] signal: Use force_sig_fault_to_task for the two calls that don't deliver to current Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23 0:39 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 21/26] signal: Remove the task parameter from force_sig_fault Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23 0:39 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 22/26] signal: Properly set TRACE_SIGNAL_LOSE_INFO in __send_signal Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23 0:39 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 23/26] signal: Move the computation of force into send_signal and correct it Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23 0:39 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 24/26] signal: Generate the siginfo in force_sig Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23 0:39 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 25/26] signal: Factor force_sig_info_to_task out of force_sig_info Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-23 0:39 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 26/26] signal: Remove the signal number and task parameters from force_sig_info Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-24 23:35 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 00/26] signal: Remove task argument " Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-29 15:37 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190523003916.20726-3-ebiederm@xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--subject='Re: [REVIEW][PATCH 02/26] signal/ptrace: Simplify and fix PTRACE_KILL' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).