From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E986C46460 for ; Wed, 29 May 2019 13:14:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66E5321019 for ; Wed, 29 May 2019 13:14:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1559135694; bh=xKlA2g0wIi0S7QT1ghsj/kNXtl6yCp86bG8AATUDAzk=; h=Date:From:To:To:To:Cc:Cc:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: List-ID:From; b=zThnaKd5tLc1/P63XUYViIagveataFSymUDzKP24gehlGbwIzWv4vkq9Zna78zWnA QJcnEc8hMz/ctHiwdkKwVtlh77zPbrggFrGPXOTtNU7henuGGEXNz+He/w1xuJ4a5h zZAbbQ4xlkTXDvKQF27gBuIB3GFeTLFtLOaY7C4U= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727048AbfE2NOx (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 May 2019 09:14:53 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:40366 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726029AbfE2NOx (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 May 2019 09:14:53 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [23.100.24.84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 43F372081C; Wed, 29 May 2019 13:14:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1559135692; bh=xKlA2g0wIi0S7QT1ghsj/kNXtl6yCp86bG8AATUDAzk=; h=Date:From:To:To:To:Cc:Cc:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=AVJjj8POoTrQ4M7YeIyqLpk553l1+dSgSikMjhX+vYUMNAKXNliKLQQGPNBYstW1w XZ4o/uG+HMJljqzFV5GehPQSqkLoa0zd+dKCy0bWBzv0W6KDjCogzb6hg8X4rWbCyc nfDQzzou7D2nvunV+KUtGTpA/cXDRyO+nSg72EL0= Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 13:14:51 +0000 From: Sasha Levin To: Sasha Levin To: "Yan, Zheng" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: idryomov@redhat.com, jlayton@redhat.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] ceph: hold i_ceph_lock when removing caps for freeing inode In-Reply-To: <20190523080646.19632-8-zyan@redhat.com> References: <20190523080646.19632-8-zyan@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20190529131452.43F372081C@mail.kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, [This is an automated email] This commit has been processed because it contains a -stable tag. The stable tag indicates that it's relevant for the following trees: all The bot has tested the following trees: v5.1.4, v5.0.18, v4.19.45, v4.14.121, v4.9.178, v4.4.180, v3.18.140. v5.1.4: Build OK! v5.0.18: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: e3ec8d6898f71 ("ceph: send cap releases more aggressively") v4.19.45: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: e3ec8d6898f71 ("ceph: send cap releases more aggressively") v4.14.121: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: a1c6b8358171c ("ceph: define argument structure for handle_cap_grant") a57d9064e4ee4 ("ceph: flush pending works before shutdown super") e3ec8d6898f71 ("ceph: send cap releases more aggressively") v4.9.178: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: a1c6b8358171c ("ceph: define argument structure for handle_cap_grant") a57d9064e4ee4 ("ceph: flush pending works before shutdown super") e3ec8d6898f71 ("ceph: send cap releases more aggressively") v4.4.180: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 13d1ad16d05ee ("libceph: move message allocation out of ceph_osdc_alloc_request()") 34b759b4a22b0 ("ceph: kill ceph_empty_snapc") 3f1af42ad0fad ("libceph: enable large, variable-sized OSD requests") 5be0389dac662 ("ceph: re-send AIO write request when getting -EOLDSNAP error") 7627151ea30bc ("libceph: define new ceph_file_layout structure") 779fe0fb8e188 ("ceph: rados pool namespace support") 922dab6134178 ("libceph, rbd: ceph_osd_linger_request, watch/notify v2") a1c6b8358171c ("ceph: define argument structure for handle_cap_grant") ae458f5a171ba ("libceph: make r_request msg_size calculation clearer") c41d13a31fefe ("rbd: use header_oid instead of header_name") c8fe9b17d055f ("ceph: Asynchronous IO support") d30291b985d18 ("libceph: variable-sized ceph_object_id") e3ec8d6898f71 ("ceph: send cap releases more aggressively") v3.18.140: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 10183a69551f7 ("ceph: check OSD caps before read/write") 28127bdd2f843 ("ceph: convert inline data to normal data before data write") 31c542a199d79 ("ceph: add inline data to pagecache") 5be0389dac662 ("ceph: re-send AIO write request when getting -EOLDSNAP error") 70db4f3629b34 ("ceph: introduce a new inode flag indicating if cached dentries are ordered") 745a8e3bccbc6 ("ceph: don't pre-allocate space for cap release messages") 7627151ea30bc ("libceph: define new ceph_file_layout structure") 779fe0fb8e188 ("ceph: rados pool namespace support") 83701246aee8f ("ceph: sync read inline data") a1c6b8358171c ("ceph: define argument structure for handle_cap_grant") affbc19a68f99 ("ceph: make sure syncfs flushes all cap snaps") c8fe9b17d055f ("ceph: Asynchronous IO support") d30291b985d18 ("libceph: variable-sized ceph_object_id") d3383a8e37f80 ("ceph: avoid block operation when !TASK_RUNNING (ceph_mdsc_sync)") e3ec8d6898f71 ("ceph: send cap releases more aggressively") e96a650a8174e ("ceph, rbd: delete unnecessary checks before two function calls") How should we proceed with this patch? -- Thanks, Sasha