LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] keys: Add a keyctl to move a key between keyrings
Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 16:25:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190529232500.GA131466@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <155856412507.10428.15987388402707639951.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>

On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 11:28:45PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Add a keyctl to atomically move a link to a key from one keyring to
> another.  The key must exist in "from" keyring and a flag can be given to
> cause the operation to fail if there's a matching key already in the "to"
> keyring.
> 
> This can be done with:
> 
> 	keyctl(KEYCTL_MOVE,
> 	       key_serial_t key,
> 	       key_serial_t from_keyring,
> 	       key_serial_t to_keyring,
> 	       unsigned int flags);
> 
> The key being moved must grant Link permission and both keyrings must grant
> Write permission.
> 
> flags should be 0 or KEYCTL_MOVE_EXCL, with the latter preventing
> displacement of a matching key from the "to" keyring.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

This shows up after a few seconds of syzkaller fuzzing with a description of
KEYCTL_MOVE added:

WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.2.0-rc1 #5 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.28/27700 is trying to acquire lock:
00000000049888d8 (keyring_serialise_link_sem){+.+.}, at: __key_link_begin+0x1c2/0x2d0 security/keys/keyring.c:1231

but task is already holding lock:
00000000b171310c (&type->lock_class/1){+.+.}, at: __key_link_begin+0xa4/0x2d0 security/keys/keyring.c:1222

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (&type->lock_class/1){+.+.}:
       lock_acquire+0x106/0x330 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4302
       down_write_nested+0x3c/0xa0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:177
       __key_unlink_begin+0x6c/0x110 security/keys/keyring.c:1398
       key_move+0x3ad/0x470 security/keys/keyring.c:1538
       keyctl_keyring_move+0xb6/0x120 security/keys/keyctl.c:610
       __do_sys_keyctl security/keys/keyctl.c:1823 [inline]
       __se_sys_keyctl+0x8e/0x2c0 security/keys/keyctl.c:1685
       __x64_sys_keyctl+0xbe/0x150 security/keys/keyctl.c:1685
       do_syscall_64+0x9e/0x4b0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:301
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe

-> #0 (keyring_serialise_link_sem){+.+.}:
       check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2417 [inline]
       validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2799 [inline]
       __lock_acquire+0x38a4/0x3c30 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3792
       lock_acquire+0x106/0x330 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4302
       down_write+0x38/0xa0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:66
       __key_link_begin+0x1c2/0x2d0 security/keys/keyring.c:1231
       key_move+0xf0/0x470 security/keys/keyring.c:1529
       keyctl_keyring_move+0xb6/0x120 security/keys/keyctl.c:610
       __do_sys_keyctl security/keys/keyctl.c:1823 [inline]
       __se_sys_keyctl+0x8e/0x2c0 security/keys/keyctl.c:1685
       __x64_sys_keyctl+0xbe/0x150 security/keys/keyctl.c:1685
       do_syscall_64+0x9e/0x4b0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:301
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe

other info that might help us debug this:

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&type->lock_class/1);
                               lock(keyring_serialise_link_sem);
                               lock(&type->lock_class/1);
  lock(keyring_serialise_link_sem);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

2 locks held by syz-executor.28/27700:
 #0: 000000002a03f208 (&type->lock_class){++++}, at: __key_unlink_begin+0x6c/0x110 security/keys/keyring.c:1398
 #1: 00000000b171310c (&type->lock_class/1){+.+.}, at: __key_link_begin+0xa4/0x2d0 security/keys/keyring.c:1222

stack backtrace:
CPU: 8 PID: 27700 Comm: syz-executor.28 Not tainted 5.2.0-rc1 #5
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
 dump_stack+0xb1/0x118 lib/dump_stack.c:113
 print_circular_bug+0x4a4/0x4b5 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1564
 check_prev_add+0xd1f/0x1af7 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2309
 check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2417 [inline]
 validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2799 [inline]
 __lock_acquire+0x38a4/0x3c30 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3792
 lock_acquire+0x106/0x330 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4302
 down_write+0x38/0xa0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:66
 __key_link_begin+0x1c2/0x2d0 security/keys/keyring.c:1231
 key_move+0xf0/0x470 security/keys/keyring.c:1529
 keyctl_keyring_move+0xb6/0x120 security/keys/keyctl.c:610
 __do_sys_keyctl security/keys/keyctl.c:1823 [inline]
 __se_sys_keyctl+0x8e/0x2c0 security/keys/keyctl.c:1685
 __x64_sys_keyctl+0xbe/0x150 security/keys/keyctl.c:1685
 do_syscall_64+0x9e/0x4b0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:301
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
RIP: 0033:0x458a09
Code: dd b4 fb ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 66 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 0f 83 ab b4 fb ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00
RSP: 002b:00007f9d53755c88 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000fa
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000071bf00 RCX: 0000000000458a09
RDX: 000000001f62d16e RSI: 000000002490e642 RDI: 000000000000001e
RBP: 00007f9d53755ca0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 000000001afbc80a R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9d537566d4
R13: 00000000004ac12c R14: 00000000006ebd68 R15: 0000000000000003
FAULT_INJECTION: forcing a failure.
name failslab, interval 1, probability 0, space 0, times 0
CPU: 8 PID: 27700 Comm: syz-executor.28 Not tainted 5.2.0-rc1 #5
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
 dump_stack+0xb1/0x118 lib/dump_stack.c:113
 fail_dump lib/fault-inject.c:51 [inline]
 should_fail+0x61e/0x720 lib/fault-inject.c:143
 __should_failslab+0xec/0x120 mm/failslab.c:32
 should_failslab+0x9/0x14 mm/slab_common.c:1610
 slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slab.h:420 [inline]
 slab_alloc mm/slab.c:3312 [inline]
 kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x146/0x2a0 mm/slab.c:3553
 kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:547 [inline]
 kzalloc include/linux/slab.h:742 [inline]
 assoc_array_insert+0xcc/0x440 lib/assoc_array.c:985
 __key_link_begin+0x120/0x2d0 security/keys/keyring.c:1236
 key_move+0xf0/0x470 security/keys/keyring.c:1529
 keyctl_keyring_move+0xb6/0x120 security/keys/keyctl.c:610
 __do_sys_keyctl security/keys/keyctl.c:1823 [inline]
 __se_sys_keyctl+0x8e/0x2c0 security/keys/keyctl.c:1685
 __x64_sys_keyctl+0xbe/0x150 security/keys/keyctl.c:1685
 do_syscall_64+0x9e/0x4b0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:301
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
RIP: 0033:0x458a09
Code: dd b4 fb ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 66 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 0f 83 ab b4 fb ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00
RSP: 002b:00007f9d53755c88 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000fa
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000071bf00 RCX: 0000000000458a09
RDX: 000000001f62d16e RSI: 000000002490e642 RDI: 000000000000001e
RBP: 00007f9d53755ca0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 000000001afbc80a R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f9d537566d4
R13: 00000000004ac12c R14: 00000000006ebd68 R15: 0000000000000003

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-05-29 23:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-22 22:28 [PATCH 0/7] keys: Miscellany David Howells
2019-05-22 22:28 ` [PATCH 1/7] keys: sparse: Fix key_fs[ug]id_changed() David Howells
2019-05-24 19:38   ` James Morris
2019-05-22 22:28 ` [PATCH 2/7] keys: sparse: Fix incorrect RCU accesses David Howells
2019-05-25  3:57   ` James Morris
2019-05-22 22:28 ` [PATCH 3/7] keys: sparse: Fix kdoc mismatches David Howells
2019-05-25  3:57   ` James Morris
2019-05-22 22:28 ` [PATCH 4/7] keys: Break bits out of key_unlink() David Howells
2019-05-28 20:41   ` James Morris
2019-05-22 22:28 ` [PATCH 5/7] keys: Make __key_link_begin() handle lockdep nesting David Howells
2019-05-28 20:42   ` James Morris
2019-05-22 22:28 ` [PATCH 6/7] keys: Add a keyctl to move a key between keyrings David Howells
2019-05-28 20:51   ` James Morris
2019-05-29 21:34   ` David Howells
2019-05-29 23:25   ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2019-05-30 13:31   ` David Howells
2019-05-22 22:28 ` [PATCH 7/7] keys: Grant Link permission to possessers of request_key auth keys David Howells
2019-05-28 21:01   ` James Morris

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190529232500.GA131466@gmail.com \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 6/7] keys: Add a keyctl to move a key between keyrings' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).