LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ptrace: restore smp_rmb() in __ptrace_may_access()
Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 11:12:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190531091245.GN2677@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190530120531.GE22536@redhat.com>
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 02:05:31PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > Anyway, looking at it, I think smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep() doesn't
> > make sense here;
>
> Well I still _think_ it should work, it provides the LOAD-LOAD ordering
> and this is what we need.
So it hard relies on being part of a control dependency, note how the
comment says that architectures that do not do load speculation can
override the smp_rmb() default with barrier() (and we used have an
architecture that made use of that, although it's been since removed).
IOW, it is an error to use smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep() without an
(immediate) preceding branch.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-31 9:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-29 11:31 [PATCH] ptrace: restore smp_rmb() in __ptrace_may_access() Jann Horn
2019-05-29 15:59 ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-29 16:01 ` Jann Horn
2019-05-29 16:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-29 17:38 ` Jann Horn
2019-05-30 1:41 ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-31 15:04 ` Jann Horn
2019-05-30 10:34 ` Andrea Parri
2019-05-31 9:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-30 12:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-31 9:12 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-05-31 9:55 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-29 21:02 ` Jann Horn
2019-05-29 18:55 ` Kees Cook
2019-05-30 12:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-31 11:56 ` Jann Horn
2019-05-31 13:35 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-31 19:37 ` Jann Horn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190531091245.GN2677@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).