LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
To: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@kernel.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com,
peterz@infradead.org, mojha@codeaurora.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH HACK RFC] cpu: Prevent late-arriving interrupts from disrupting offline
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2019 18:12:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190602011253.GA6167@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
Scheduling-clock interrupts can arrive late in the CPU-offline process,
after idle entry and the subsequent call to cpuhp_report_idle_dead().
Once execution passes the call to rcu_report_dead(), RCU is ignoring
the CPU, which results in lockdep complaints when the interrupt handler
uses RCU:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
=============================
WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
5.2.0-rc1+ #681 Not tainted
-----------------------------
kernel/sched/fair.c:9542 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
other info that might help us debug this:
RCU used illegally from offline CPU!
rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
no locks held by swapper/5/0.
stack backtrace:
CPU: 5 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/5 Not tainted 5.2.0-rc1+ #681
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
dump_stack+0x5e/0x8b
trigger_load_balance+0xa8/0x390
? tick_sched_do_timer+0x60/0x60
update_process_times+0x3b/0x50
tick_sched_handle+0x2f/0x40
tick_sched_timer+0x32/0x70
__hrtimer_run_queues+0xd3/0x3b0
hrtimer_interrupt+0x11d/0x270
? sched_clock_local+0xc/0x74
smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x79/0x200
apic_timer_interrupt+0xf/0x20
</IRQ>
RIP: 0010:delay_tsc+0x22/0x50
Code: ff 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 65 44 8b 05 18 a7 11 48 0f ae e8 0f 31 48 89 d6 48 c1 e6 20 48 09 c6 eb 0e f3 90 65 8b 05 fe a6 11 48 <41> 39 c0 75 18 0f ae e8 0f 31 48 c1 e2 20 48 09 c2 48 89 d0 48 29
RSP: 0000:ffff8f92c0157ed0 EFLAGS: 00000212 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffff13
RAX: 0000000000000005 RBX: ffff8c861f356400 RCX: ffff8f92c0157e64
RDX: 000000321214c8cc RSI: 00000032120daa7f RDI: 0000000000260f15
RBP: 0000000000000005 R08: 0000000000000005 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8c861ee18000 R15: ffff8c861ee18000
cpuhp_report_idle_dead+0x31/0x60
do_idle+0x1d5/0x200
? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x2d/0x40
cpu_startup_entry+0x14/0x20
start_secondary+0x151/0x170
secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This happens rarely, but can be forced by happen more often by
placing delays in cpuhp_report_idle_dead() following the call to
rcu_report_dead(). With this in place, the folloiwng rcutorture
scenario reproduces the problem within a few minute:
tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/bin/kvm.sh --cpus 8 --duration 5 --kconfig "CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=y CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y" --configs "TREE04"
This commit uses the crude by effective expedient of disabling interrupts
via local_irq_disable() just prior to the call to rcu_report_dead().
This passes light testing. Of course, preventing the scheduling-clock
interrupt might be preferable. However, this commit does have the
advantage of allowing progress to be made on other RCU bugs.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
index 448efc06bb2d..3b33d83b793d 100644
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -930,6 +930,7 @@ void cpuhp_report_idle_dead(void)
struct cpuhp_cpu_state *st = this_cpu_ptr(&cpuhp_state);
BUG_ON(st->state != CPUHP_AP_OFFLINE);
+ local_irq_disable();
rcu_report_dead(smp_processor_id());
st->state = CPUHP_AP_IDLE_DEAD;
udelay(1000);
next reply other threads:[~2019-06-02 1:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-02 1:12 Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2019-06-03 8:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-06-03 11:44 ` Mark Rutland
2019-06-03 13:39 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-06-04 7:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-06-04 13:29 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-06-08 16:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-06-11 13:14 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-06-11 13:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-06-11 14:39 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-06-11 19:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-06-04 8:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-06-04 12:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190602011253.GA6167@linux.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mojha@codeaurora.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--subject='Re: [PATCH HACK RFC] cpu: Prevent late-arriving interrupts from disrupting offline' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).