LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] staging: rtl8188eu: core: Replace function rtw_free_network_nolock
@ 2019-06-04  8:12 Nishka Dasgupta
  2019-06-06 12:59 ` Greg KH
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Nishka Dasgupta @ 2019-06-04  8:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: larry.finger, gregkh, straube.linux, devel, linux-kernel, flbue,
	puranjay12
  Cc: Nishka Dasgupta

Remove function rtw_free_network_nolock, as all it does is call
_rtw_free_network_nolock, and rename _rtw_free_network_nolock to
rtw_free_network_nolock.

Signed-off-by: Nishka Dasgupta <nishkadg.linux@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c | 8 +-------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c
index 0abb2df32645..454c5795903d 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ static void _rtw_free_network(struct mlme_priv *pmlmepriv, struct wlan_network *
 	spin_unlock_bh(&free_queue->lock);
 }
 
-void _rtw_free_network_nolock(struct	mlme_priv *pmlmepriv, struct wlan_network *pnetwork)
+void rtw_free_network_nolock(struct	mlme_priv *pmlmepriv, struct wlan_network *pnetwork)
 {
 	struct __queue *free_queue = &pmlmepriv->free_bss_pool;
 
@@ -276,12 +276,6 @@ static struct wlan_network *rtw_alloc_network(struct mlme_priv *pmlmepriv)
 	return _rtw_alloc_network(pmlmepriv);
 }
 
-static void rtw_free_network_nolock(struct mlme_priv *pmlmepriv,
-				    struct wlan_network *pnetwork)
-{
-	_rtw_free_network_nolock(pmlmepriv, pnetwork);
-}
-
 int rtw_is_same_ibss(struct adapter *adapter, struct wlan_network *pnetwork)
 {
 	int ret = true;
-- 
2.19.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8188eu: core: Replace function rtw_free_network_nolock
  2019-06-04  8:12 [PATCH] staging: rtl8188eu: core: Replace function rtw_free_network_nolock Nishka Dasgupta
@ 2019-06-06 12:59 ` Greg KH
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2019-06-06 12:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nishka Dasgupta
  Cc: larry.finger, straube.linux, devel, linux-kernel, flbue, puranjay12

On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 01:42:22PM +0530, Nishka Dasgupta wrote:
> Remove function rtw_free_network_nolock, as all it does is call
> _rtw_free_network_nolock, and rename _rtw_free_network_nolock to
> rtw_free_network_nolock.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nishka Dasgupta <nishkadg.linux@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c | 8 +-------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c
> index 0abb2df32645..454c5795903d 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c
> @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ static void _rtw_free_network(struct mlme_priv *pmlmepriv, struct wlan_network *
>  	spin_unlock_bh(&free_queue->lock);
>  }
>  
> -void _rtw_free_network_nolock(struct	mlme_priv *pmlmepriv, struct wlan_network *pnetwork)
> +void rtw_free_network_nolock(struct	mlme_priv *pmlmepriv, struct wlan_network *pnetwork)

Why is this function moved from being static to not being static?

that doesn't seem right to me, does it to you?

thanks,

greg k-h

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-06-06 12:59 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-06-04  8:12 [PATCH] staging: rtl8188eu: core: Replace function rtw_free_network_nolock Nishka Dasgupta
2019-06-06 12:59 ` Greg KH

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).