LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@gmail.com>
Cc: "Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pwm: pca9685: fix pwm/gpio inter-operation
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 17:47:28 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190604144728.GY2781@lahna.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGngYiUc5_A1umM=8f12BLejq-3aqHnExEQ2RxNABv8u3HdqnA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 09:34:46AM -0400, Sven Van Asbroeck wrote:
> Thank you for the review, Mika ! See comments below.
>
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 5:14 AM Mika Westerberg
> <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > This approach will also prevent the request of the "all" pwm channel, if any
> > > other pwm channel is already in use. Is this correct behaviour?
> >
> > Sounds correct to me.
>
> Something that occurred to me right after I pressed the send button:
>
> This patch will prevent a pwm 'all channels' request if at least one
> of the pwm's is in use. But it will not guard against the opposite:
> after the 'all channels' pwm is requested, it will still allow requests
> for other pwms/gpios !
>
> This is identical to the old behaviour. But maybe this is an oversight
> and not a feature?
Most probably an oversight.
> Proposal:
> 1. prevent request of 'all channel' if any of the pwms/gpios are in use
> 2. prevent request of all other pwms/gpios if 'all channels' is in use
Makes sense.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-04 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-03 15:12 Sven Van Asbroeck
2019-06-04 9:14 ` Mika Westerberg
2019-06-04 13:34 ` Sven Van Asbroeck
2019-06-04 14:47 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190604144728.GY2781@lahna.fi.intel.com \
--to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thesven73@gmail.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=yuehaibing@huawei.com \
--subject='Re: [PATCH] pwm: pca9685: fix pwm/gpio inter-operation' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).