Re: [PATCH 0/3] (Qualcomm) UFS device reset support

[Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>]

On Wed 05 Jun 02:32 PDT 2019, Avri Altman wrote:

> > 
> > On Tue 04 Jun 22:50 PDT 2019, Avri Altman wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 12:22 AM Bjorn Andersson
> > > > <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > This series exposes the ufs_reset line as a gpio, adds support for ufshcd to
> > > > > acquire and toggle this and then adds this to SDM845 MTP.
> > > > >
> > > > > Bjorn Andersson (3):
> > > > >   pinctrl: qcom: sdm845: Expose ufs_reset as gpio
> > > > >   scsi: ufs: Allow resetting the UFS device
> > > > >   arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845-mtp: Specify UFS device-reset GPIO
> > > >
> > > > Adding similar change as in sdm845-mtp to the not yet upstream
> > > > blueline dts, I validated this allows my micron UFS pixel3 to boot.
> > > >
> > > > Tested-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
> > > Maybe ufs_hba_variant_ops would be the proper place to add this?
> > >
> > 
> > Are you saying that these memories only need a reset when they are
> > paired with the Qualcomm host controller?
> ufs_hba_variant_ops is for vendors to implement their own vops,
> and as you can see, many of them do.
> Adding hw_reset to that template seems like the proper way
> to do what you are doing.
> 

Right, but the vops is operations related to the UFS controller, this
property relates to the memory connected.

E.g I have a Hynix memory and John have a Micron memory that needs this
reset and my assumption is that these memories will need their RESET pin
toggled regardless of which controller they are connected to.

Regards,
Bjorn