From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77478C31E45 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 22:23:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F44C20B7C for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 22:23:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="Ham9qmNF" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727348AbfFMWXF (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jun 2019 18:23:05 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:47066 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725793AbfFMWXE (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jun 2019 18:23:04 -0400 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300EC2F06D5002DB642DF7EFF7228.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f06:d500:2db6:42df:7eff:7228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 52B441EC02FE; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 00:23:03 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1560464583; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=IO33KnvmZahzxGnM+KPqWV4c6LOFfLrThEc6ocuLA5w=; b=Ham9qmNFD9ov9SgCiizWBhlk/gFGYkIlphb0AHfKOnFZXyuci4f8YyxEtEBG7+SimlJva5 QyZf7/zkDEbk4TvAR5uf5VrGvaz5QP+z6Z33mDT8w26LjxdIHUFvrwKeX3iBz9A+Y9w/cv PkWh20h+RV4aNVI2wHV95qCpupKN2BM= Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 00:22:55 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: "Ghannam, Yazen" Cc: "linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] EDAC/amd64: Support more than two controllers for chip selects handling Message-ID: <20190613222255.GH11598@zn.tnic> References: <20190531234501.32826-1-Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com> <20190531234501.32826-3-Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com> <20190613141715.GD11598@zn.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 08:58:16PM +0000, Ghannam, Yazen wrote: > The first patch is meant as a fix for existing systems, and this patch > is to add new functionality. > > I can merge them together if you think that's more appropriate. Is it fixing such a critical issue that it needs to be a separate patch? If so, it should be CC:stable. But I think we've survived without it just fine so why bother. But maybe there's an aspect I'm missing... -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.