From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=hRvo=UZ=vger.kernel.org=linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C486C48BD3
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 12:31:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55B522063F
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 12:31:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1727258AbfFZMbo (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 26 Jun 2019 08:31:44 -0400
Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:60206 "EHLO foss.arm.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1726131AbfFZMbo (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 26 Jun 2019 08:31:44 -0400
Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14])
        by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2E41D6E;
        Wed, 26 Jun 2019 05:31:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lakrids.cambridge.arm.com (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.121.207.14])
        by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 82E143F718;
        Wed, 26 Jun 2019 05:31:42 -0700 (PDT)
Date:   Wed, 26 Jun 2019 13:31:40 +0100
From:   Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc:     Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, will.deacon@arm.com,
        catalin.marinas@arm.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Devmap cleanups + arm64 support
Message-ID: <20190626123139.GB20635@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com>
References: <cover.1558547956.git.robin.murphy@arm.com>
 <20190626073533.GA24199@infradead.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190626073533.GA24199@infradead.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.1+11 (2f07cb52) (2018-12-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 12:35:33AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Robin, Andrew:

As a heads-up, Robin is currently on holiday, so this is all down to
Andrew's preference.

> I have a series for the hmm tree, which touches the section size
> bits, and remove device public memory support.
> 
> It might be best if we include this series in the hmm tree as well
> to avoid conflicts.  Is it ok to include the rebase version of at least
> the cleanup part (which looks like it is not required for the actual
> arm64 support) in the hmm tree to avoid conflicts?

Per the cover letter, the arm64 patch has a build dependency on the
others, so that might require a stable brnach for the common prefix.

Thanks,
Mark.