LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"will.deacon@arm.com" <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	"catalin.marinas@arm.com" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"anshuman.khandual@arm.com" <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Devmap cleanups + arm64 support
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2019 13:53:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190704135332.234891ac6ce641bf29913d06@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190704195934.GA23542@mellanox.com>

On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 19:59:38 +0000 Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 11:53:24AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 20:35:51 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > > Let me know and I can help orchestate this.
> > > 
> > > Well.  Whatever works.  In this situation I'd stage the patches after
> > > linux-next and would merge them up after the prereq patches have been
> > > merged into mainline.  Easy.
> > 
> > All right, what the hell just happened? 
> 
> Christoph's patch series for the devmap & hmm rework finally made it
> into linux-next

We're talking about "dev_pagemap related cleanups v4", yes?

I note that linux-next contains "mm: remove the HMM config option"
which was present in Christoph's v3 series but wasn't present in v4. 
Perhaps something has gone wrong here.

> sorry, it took quite a few iterations on the list to
> get all the reviews and tests, and figure out how to resolve some
> other conflicting things. So it just made it this week.
> 
> Recall, this is the patch series I asked you about routing a few weeks
> ago, as it really exceeded the small area that hmm.git was supposed to
> cover. I think we are both caught off guard how big the conflict is!

I guess I was distracted - I should have taken a look to see how
mergable it all was.

It's a large patchset and it appears to be mainly (entirely?) code
cleanups.  I don't think such material would be appropriate for a late
-rc7 merge even if it didn't conflict with lots of other higher
priority pending functional changes and fixes!


  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-04 20:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-23 15:03 Robin Murphy
2019-05-23 15:03 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] mm/memremap: Rename and consolidate SECTION_SIZE Robin Murphy
2019-05-23 15:03 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] mm: clean up is_device_*_page() definitions Robin Murphy
2019-05-23 15:03 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] mm: introduce ARCH_HAS_PTE_DEVMAP Robin Murphy
2019-05-23 15:03 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: mm: Implement pte_devmap support Robin Murphy
2019-05-24 18:08   ` Will Deacon
2019-05-24 18:38     ` Robin Murphy
2019-05-27  6:23     ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-05-28 13:46   ` [PATCH v3.1 " Robin Murphy
2019-05-29 10:03     ` Will Deacon
2019-06-26  7:35 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] Devmap cleanups + arm64 support Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-26 12:31   ` Mark Rutland
2019-06-26 15:38     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-26 15:45       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-27  3:35         ` Andrew Morton
2019-07-04 18:53           ` Andrew Morton
2019-07-04 19:59             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-04 20:53               ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2019-07-04 21:28                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-05 15:47                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-04 20:54               ` Robin Murphy
2019-07-04 21:13                 ` Andrew Morton
2019-07-05 11:16                   ` Robin Murphy
2019-07-04 23:37               ` Dan Williams
2019-07-05 12:32                 ` Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190704135332.234891ac6ce641bf29913d06@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Devmap cleanups + arm64 support' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).