LKML Archive on
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <>
To: Jeff Kirsher <>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <>,
	Kees Cook <>,,
Subject: [PATCH] e1000: Distribute switch variables for initialization
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 22:23:02 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)

Variables declared in a switch statement before any case statements
cannot be automatically initialized with compiler instrumentation (as
they are not part of any execution flow). With GCC's proposed automatic
stack variable initialization feature, this triggers a warning (and they
don't get initialized). Clang's automatic stack variable initialization
(via CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL=y) doesn't throw a warning, but it also
doesn't initialize such variables[1]. Note that these warnings (or silent
skipping) happen before the dead-store elimination optimization phase,
so even when the automatic initializations are later elided in favor of
direct initializations, the warnings remain.

To avoid these problems, move such variables into the "case" where
they're used or lift them up into the main function body.

drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c: In function ‘e1000_xmit_frame’:
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c:3143:18: warning: statement will never be executed [-Wswitch-unreachable]
 3143 |     unsigned int pull_size;
      |                  ^~~~~~~~~


Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <>
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c |    4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c
index 2bced34c19ba..a540d0206129 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c
@@ -3140,8 +3140,9 @@ static netdev_tx_t e1000_xmit_frame(struct sk_buff *skb,
 		hdr_len = skb_transport_offset(skb) + tcp_hdrlen(skb);
 		if (skb->data_len && hdr_len == len) {
 			switch (hw->mac_type) {
+			case e1000_82544: {
 				unsigned int pull_size;
-			case e1000_82544:
 				/* Make sure we have room to chop off 4 bytes,
 				 * and that the end alignment will work out to
 				 * this hardware's requirements
@@ -3162,6 +3163,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t e1000_xmit_frame(struct sk_buff *skb,
 				len = skb_headlen(skb);
+			}
 				/* do nothing */

             reply	other threads:[~2020-02-20  6:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-20  6:23 Kees Cook [this message]
2020-02-22  2:01 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Brown, Aaron F

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] e1000: Distribute switch variables for initialization' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).