LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>,
grant.likely@arm.com, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>,
Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] driver core: Break infinite loop when deferred probe can't be satisfied
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 10:50:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200313085030.GO1922688@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3b0586f4-0af4-3a17-7a4b-e73910f66bff@ti.com>
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 09:35:55AM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> On 12/03/2020 12.54, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 10:32:32AM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> >> On 09/03/2020 16.11, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
...
> >> Reviewed-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
> >
> > Thank you, Peter!
> >
> > Yes, under "successful probe" we understand the one that has stayed probed
> > after the deferred trigger cycle. That's why a decrement counter is essential
> > to make this scheme work.
> >
> > Ideally I would like to get Grant's comment on / test of this...
>
> I fixed up Grant's email address to get his attention you are seeking for...
Ah, thank you!
How can I forget that he moved to ARM while ago? Grant, I may re-send series
with your address corrected if it feels better to you.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-13 8:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-09 14:11 Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-09 14:11 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] driver core: Read atomic counter once in driver_probe_done() Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-18 23:49 ` Ferry Toth
2020-03-09 14:11 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] driver core: Replace open-coded list_last_entry() Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-11 8:32 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] driver core: Break infinite loop when deferred probe can't be satisfied Peter Ujfalusi
2020-03-12 10:54 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-13 7:35 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2020-03-13 8:50 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2020-03-18 23:47 ` Ferry Toth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200313085030.GO1922688@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=a.hajda@samsung.com \
--cc=artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=balbi@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=grant.likely@arm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--subject='Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] driver core: Break infinite loop when deferred probe can'\''t be satisfied' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).