From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7F58C2BB85 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 09:20:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D0220771 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 09:20:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1586942401; bh=okUruJDPJKacfzZ0/FQ2AYhcvGKcB0ud1pJhEHMTmco=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=Q2Iw6q9o0DkrQ5e+dk16WuFUDET8hujFu1jFVUDMpxSVb9MfOf5OxpUgSdmIKk8dE 3ZcpqZhF/9+xdfekBQoqygf5/HsgJqxvMlHx4BT4WGakDSrqwv4RAjWZ/UPCf7s/q0 JVKAQ+XaHISlDtv8Kd6Xrqn3Mwu/JbBVGPsQPlso= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2895323AbgDOJT7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Apr 2020 05:19:59 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:36732 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2895294AbgDOJTe (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Apr 2020 05:19:34 -0400 Received: from localhost (fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com [217.140.96.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1BC4D206A2; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 09:19:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1586942373; bh=okUruJDPJKacfzZ0/FQ2AYhcvGKcB0ud1pJhEHMTmco=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=BDYTulwRtubO/StyzvoxSGb4Z86eU025StVoxdQmaKKQdMWZuQ6VM4J01YUyn2odB guw1G6SfYFsGjxMWQ8oT6Nqc1trs/EnoFvRMkLU5kwx9t6UBowe5OQK4I7IPadnP4P wusKq93W4BME6BmLB0JXCok9AbgT0+cFAuA4en0U= Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 10:19:31 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Robin Gong Cc: "s.hauer@pengutronix.de" , "vkoul@kernel.org" , "shawnguo@kernel.org" , "u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de" , "robh+dt@kernel.org" , "festevam@gmail.com" , "dan.j.williams@intel.com" , "mark.rutland@arm.com" , "catalin.marinas@arm.com" , "will.deacon@arm.com" , "l.stach@pengutronix.de" , "martin.fuzzey@flowbird.group" , "kernel@pengutronix.de" , "linux-spi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , dl-linux-imx , "dmaengine@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/13] add ecspi ERR009165 for i.mx6/7 soc family Message-ID: <20200415091931.GA5265@sirena.org.uk> References: <1583944596-23410-1-git-send-email-yibin.gong@nxp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gKMricLos+KVdGMg" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: Hire the morally handicapped. User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --gKMricLos+KVdGMg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 08:41:17AM +0000, Robin Gong wrote: > Ping.... > On 2020/03/11 16:35 Robin Gong wrote: > > There is ecspi ERR009165 on i.mx6/7 soc family, which cause FIFO transf= er to Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time for review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so=20 on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes) please allow at least a couple of weeks for review. If there have been review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed. Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches for the subsystem are normally handled. --gKMricLos+KVdGMg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAl6W0Z8ACgkQJNaLcl1U h9Cl5Af/RsVCkwJ2F2y85wo6iV4ieGbzZRxbI7skDohZNDOFRyf1i8kEXUex8Pyb OHjSzFguwzTlhgg6PMkp8R929OiFE3Bu8vupFdNdaw2fKZTFNoHInLjcqOtuDwSW N4+v2rbYrlGybSYpMvl8tDz3tu/eQl1cOmdSg/UWDUpStyCrzsAMcaKJA5kEJavD NoAHcE2LKjVeo34XmpGWOI8xiAgGqDLm27zQ2JGt6nmZxR33BS3HDfz0Fc5kCnut XVx7ggmvMMXvERR4naP/m/c9EkZ470SjZnwYtO71L9ncM62YJdHDogRS8t0ZWn3B sNTl4T+hhMymPnKqvdtRch+txbGv0A== =lwLW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gKMricLos+KVdGMg--