From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A15DEC28CBC for ; Sat, 9 May 2020 12:49:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E81320820 for ; Sat, 9 May 2020 12:49:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=armlinux.org.uk header.i=@armlinux.org.uk header.b="lNsNpV+R" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727834AbgEIMtD (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 May 2020 08:49:03 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58556 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726017AbgEIMtC (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 May 2020 08:49:02 -0400 Received: from pandora.armlinux.org.uk (pandora.armlinux.org.uk [IPv6:2001:4d48:ad52:3201:214:fdff:fe10:1be6]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D73BEC061A0C; Sat, 9 May 2020 05:49:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armlinux.org.uk; s=pandora-2019; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ofKctXoH+m0Fuga5hDoLoGrcO5F7LTTcAmCfOo9W42Y=; b=lNsNpV+RcKH1Qn1rBTs5f8+rU 68IqQuKpdatZdVlW7YhUTxVgK9SqODJiqutdr1KWEd7G/5bE++/3GcQ6m7yILOVf863J4u/HMxwFo kARNkY1UmQrgupIXrLOPXJxTdoq4GzprmkKmwAUXQ9Td0VJoGtSERY6kJonpRIV/kOiD7rGFr3kQZ P1E1g9d+rRpY0IwzgHtJFr7QTZFUBA2dZOake/tEAUUZZqnCbEih5Yn0GZaCY3YhZAig5s1/qFF/T hVGG15CbxeenQIkNhnJ2QYReFGBKfbtcRJmVcc3MQbQBnkopfsd68tBV0TKqQ2QZK5MKayqas+HUn CTOloW3nQ==; Received: from shell.armlinux.org.uk ([2001:4d48:ad52:3201:5054:ff:fe00:4ec]:38016) by pandora.armlinux.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jXOuO-0003qz-Ck; Sat, 09 May 2020 13:48:48 +0100 Received: from linux by shell.armlinux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jXOuJ-0002rh-R8; Sat, 09 May 2020 13:48:43 +0100 Date: Sat, 9 May 2020 13:48:43 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin To: Thomas Petazzoni Cc: Stefan Chulski , Matteo Croce , "David S . Miller" , Maxime Chevallier , netdev , LKML , Antoine Tenart , "gregory.clement@bootlin.com" , "miquel.raynal@bootlin.com" , Nadav Haklai , Marcin Wojtas , Linux ARM Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH net-next 3/5] net: mvpp2: cls: Use RSS contexts to handle RSS tables Message-ID: <20200509124843.GC1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> References: <20190524100554.8606-1-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com> <20190524100554.8606-4-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com> <20200423170003.GT25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20200509114518.GB1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20200509141644.29861e96@windsurf.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200509141644.29861e96@windsurf.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 02:16:44PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Hello, > > On Sat, 9 May 2020 12:45:18 +0100 > Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: > > > Looking at the timeline here, it looks like Matteo raised the issue > > very quickly after the patch was sent on the 14th April, and despite > > following up on it, despite me following up on it, bootlin have > > remained quiet. > > Unfortunately, we are no longer actively working on Marvell platform > support at the moment. We might have a look on a best effort basis, but > this is potentially a non-trivial issue, so I'm not sure when we will > have the chance to investigate and fix this. That may be the case, but that doesn't excuse the fact that we have a regression and we need to do something. Please can you suggest how we resolve this regression prior to 5.7-final? -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 10.2Mbps down 587kbps up