LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [RESEND PATCH v2 0/3] RPMCC for SM6125
@ 2021-06-29 10:26 Martin Botka
  2021-06-29 10:26 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 1/3] rpmcc: Add sm6125 compatible Martin Botka
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Martin Botka @ 2021-06-29 10:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: martin.botka1
  Cc: ~postmarketos/upstreaming, konrad.dybcio,
	angelogioacchino.delregno, marijn.suijten, jamipkettunen,
	paul.bouchara, Martin Botka, Andy Gross, Bjorn Andersson,
	Michael Turquette, Stephen Boyd, Rob Herring, linux-arm-msm,
	linux-clk, devicetree, linux-kernel

This patch series adds support for the
RPMCC found in SM6125 SoC.

In this resend i didnt include 2 patches
that were already merged.

Changes in v2:
Add commit description to all the patches

Martin Botka (3):
  rpmcc: Add sm6125 compatible
  dt-bindings: clk: qcom: smd-rpm: Document SM6125 compatible
  rpmcc: Add support for SM6125

 .../devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.txt  |  1 +
 drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c                | 56 +++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.h              |  1 +
 3 files changed, 58 insertions(+)

-- 
2.32.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [RESEND PATCH v2 1/3] rpmcc: Add sm6125 compatible
  2021-06-29 10:26 [RESEND PATCH v2 0/3] RPMCC for SM6125 Martin Botka
@ 2021-06-29 10:26 ` Martin Botka
  2021-07-27 21:47   ` Stephen Boyd
  2021-06-29 10:26 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: clk: qcom: smd-rpm: Document SM6125 compatible Martin Botka
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Martin Botka @ 2021-06-29 10:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: martin.botka1
  Cc: ~postmarketos/upstreaming, konrad.dybcio,
	angelogioacchino.delregno, marijn.suijten, jamipkettunen,
	paul.bouchara, Martin Botka, Andy Gross, Bjorn Andersson,
	Michael Turquette, Stephen Boyd, Rob Herring, linux-arm-msm,
	linux-clk, devicetree, linux-kernel

Add a compatible for SM6125 and assing correct data

Signed-off-by: Martin Botka <martin.botka@somainline.org>
---
 drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
index 0e1dfa89489e..8200c26b968c 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
@@ -1070,6 +1070,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id rpm_smd_clk_match_table[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,rpmcc-msm8998", .data = &rpm_clk_msm8998 },
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,rpmcc-qcs404",  .data = &rpm_clk_qcs404  },
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,rpmcc-sdm660",  .data = &rpm_clk_sdm660  },
+	{ .compatible = "qcom,rpmcc-sm6125",  .data = &rpm_clk_sm6125  },
 	{ }
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rpm_smd_clk_match_table);
-- 
2.32.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [RESEND PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: clk: qcom: smd-rpm: Document SM6125 compatible
  2021-06-29 10:26 [RESEND PATCH v2 0/3] RPMCC for SM6125 Martin Botka
  2021-06-29 10:26 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 1/3] rpmcc: Add sm6125 compatible Martin Botka
@ 2021-06-29 10:26 ` Martin Botka
  2021-07-14 21:08   ` Rob Herring
  2021-07-27 21:48   ` Stephen Boyd
  2021-06-29 10:26 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 3/3] rpmcc: Add support for SM6125 Martin Botka
  2021-06-29 10:27 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 0/3] RPMCC " Martin Botka
  3 siblings, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Martin Botka @ 2021-06-29 10:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: martin.botka1
  Cc: ~postmarketos/upstreaming, konrad.dybcio,
	angelogioacchino.delregno, marijn.suijten, jamipkettunen,
	paul.bouchara, Martin Botka, Andy Gross, Bjorn Andersson,
	Michael Turquette, Stephen Boyd, Rob Herring, linux-arm-msm,
	linux-clk, devicetree, linux-kernel

Document the newly added compatible for sm6125 rpmcc.

Signed-off-by: Martin Botka <martin.botka@somainline.org>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.txt | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.txt
index b44a0622fb3a..bc6ef573aa7c 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.txt
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ Required properties :
 			"qcom,rpmcc-msm8998", "qcom,rpmcc"
 			"qcom,rpmcc-qcs404", "qcom,rpmcc"
 			"qcom,rpmcc-sdm660", "qcom,rpmcc"
+			"qcom,rpmcc-sm6125", "qcom,rpmcc"
 
 - #clock-cells : shall contain 1
 
-- 
2.32.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [RESEND PATCH v2 3/3] rpmcc: Add support for SM6125
  2021-06-29 10:26 [RESEND PATCH v2 0/3] RPMCC for SM6125 Martin Botka
  2021-06-29 10:26 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 1/3] rpmcc: Add sm6125 compatible Martin Botka
  2021-06-29 10:26 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: clk: qcom: smd-rpm: Document SM6125 compatible Martin Botka
@ 2021-06-29 10:26 ` Martin Botka
  2021-07-27 21:46   ` Stephen Boyd
  2021-06-29 10:27 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 0/3] RPMCC " Martin Botka
  3 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Martin Botka @ 2021-06-29 10:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: martin.botka1
  Cc: ~postmarketos/upstreaming, konrad.dybcio,
	angelogioacchino.delregno, marijn.suijten, jamipkettunen,
	paul.bouchara, Martin Botka, Andy Gross, Bjorn Andersson,
	Michael Turquette, Stephen Boyd, Rob Herring, linux-arm-msm,
	linux-clk, devicetree, linux-kernel

This commit adds support for RPM clocks found in SM6125 SoC

Signed-off-by: Martin Botka <martin.botka@somainline.org>
---
 drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c   | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.h |  1 +
 2 files changed, 56 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
index 8200c26b968c..51458f740ba0 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
@@ -1059,6 +1059,61 @@ static const struct rpm_smd_clk_desc rpm_clk_sdm660 = {
 	.num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm660_clks),
 };
 
+/* SM6125 */
+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_BRANCH(sm6125, bi_tcxo, bi_tcxo_ao,
+					QCOM_SMD_RPM_MISC_CLK, 0, 19200000);
+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, cnoc_clk, cnoc_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_BUS_CLK, 1);
+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, bimc_clk, bimc_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_MEM_CLK, 0);
+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, snoc_clk, snoc_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_BUS_CLK, 2);
+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_BRANCH(sm6125, qdss_clk, qdss_a_clk,
+					QCOM_SMD_RPM_MISC_CLK, 1, 19200000);
+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, ce1_clk, ce1_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_CE_CLK, 0);
+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, ipa_clk, ipa_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_IPA_CLK, 0);
+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, qup_clk, qup_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_QUP_CLK, 0);
+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, mmnrt_clk, mmnrt_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_MMAXI_CLK, 0);
+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, mmrt_clk, mmrt_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_MMAXI_CLK, 1);
+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, snoc_periph_clk, snoc_periph_a_clk,
+						QCOM_SMD_RPM_BUS_CLK, 0);
+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, snoc_lpass_clk, snoc_lpass_a_clk,
+						QCOM_SMD_RPM_BUS_CLK, 5);
+
+/* SMD_XO_BUFFER */
+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(sm6125, ln_bb_clk1, ln_bb_clk1_a, 1);
+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(sm6125, ln_bb_clk2, ln_bb_clk2_a, 2);
+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(sm6125, ln_bb_clk3, ln_bb_clk3_a, 3);
+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(sm6125, rf_clk1, rf_clk1_a, 4);
+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(sm6125, rf_clk2, rf_clk2_a, 5);
+
+static struct clk_smd_rpm *sm6125_clks[] = {
+	[RPM_SMD_XO_CLK_SRC] = &sm6125_bi_tcxo,
+	[RPM_SMD_XO_A_CLK_SRC] = &sm6125_bi_tcxo_ao,
+	[RPM_SMD_SNOC_CLK] = &sm6125_snoc_clk,
+	[RPM_SMD_SNOC_A_CLK] = &sm6125_snoc_a_clk,
+	[RPM_SMD_BIMC_CLK] = &sm6125_bimc_clk,
+	[RPM_SMD_BIMC_A_CLK] = &sm6125_bimc_a_clk,
+	[RPM_SMD_QDSS_CLK] = &sm6125_qdss_clk,
+	[RPM_SMD_QDSS_A_CLK] = &sm6125_qdss_a_clk,
+	[RPM_SMD_RF_CLK1] = &sm6125_rf_clk1,
+	[RPM_SMD_RF_CLK1_A] = &sm6125_rf_clk1_a,
+	[RPM_SMD_RF_CLK2] = &sm6125_rf_clk2,
+	[RPM_SMD_RF_CLK2_A] = &sm6125_rf_clk2_a,
+	[RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK1] = &sm6125_ln_bb_clk1,
+	[RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK1_A] = &sm6125_ln_bb_clk1_a,
+	[RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK2] = &sm6125_ln_bb_clk2,
+	[RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK2_A] = &sm6125_ln_bb_clk2_a,
+	[RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK3] = &sm6125_ln_bb_clk3,
+	[RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK3_A] = &sm6125_ln_bb_clk3_a,
+	[RPM_SMD_CNOC_CLK] = &sm6125_cnoc_clk,
+	[RPM_SMD_CNOC_A_CLK] = &sm6125_cnoc_a_clk,
+	[RPM_SMD_CE1_CLK] = &sm6125_ce1_clk,
+	[RPM_SMD_CE1_A_CLK] = &sm6125_ce1_a_clk,
+};
+
+static const struct rpm_smd_clk_desc rpm_clk_sm6125 = {
+	.clks = sm6125_clks,
+	.num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(sm6125_clks),
+};
+
 static const struct of_device_id rpm_smd_clk_match_table[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,rpmcc-msm8916", .data = &rpm_clk_msm8916 },
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,rpmcc-msm8936", .data = &rpm_clk_msm8936 },
diff --git a/include/linux/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.h b/include/linux/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.h
index f2645ec52520..b737d7e456e4 100644
--- a/include/linux/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.h
+++ b/include/linux/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.h
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ struct qcom_smd_rpm;
 #define QCOM_SMD_RPM_NCPA	0x6170636E
 #define QCOM_SMD_RPM_NCPB	0x6270636E
 #define QCOM_SMD_RPM_OCMEM_PWR	0x706d636f
+#define QCOM_SMD_RPM_QUP_CLK	0x00707571
 #define QCOM_SMD_RPM_QPIC_CLK	0x63697071
 #define QCOM_SMD_RPM_SMPA	0x61706d73
 #define QCOM_SMD_RPM_SMPB	0x62706d73
-- 
2.32.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 0/3] RPMCC for SM6125
  2021-06-29 10:26 [RESEND PATCH v2 0/3] RPMCC for SM6125 Martin Botka
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-06-29 10:26 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 3/3] rpmcc: Add support for SM6125 Martin Botka
@ 2021-06-29 10:27 ` Martin Botka
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Martin Botka @ 2021-06-29 10:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: martin.botka1
  Cc: ~postmarketos/upstreaming, konrad.dybcio,
	angelogioacchino.delregno, marijn.suijten, jamipkettunen,
	paul.bouchara, Andy Gross, Bjorn Andersson, Michael Turquette,
	Stephen Boyd, Rob Herring, linux-arm-msm, linux-clk, devicetree,
	linux-kernel


Sorry for sending it second time. Forgot to add To: as was previously 
asked



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: clk: qcom: smd-rpm: Document SM6125 compatible
  2021-06-29 10:26 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: clk: qcom: smd-rpm: Document SM6125 compatible Martin Botka
@ 2021-07-14 21:08   ` Rob Herring
  2021-07-27 21:48   ` Stephen Boyd
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2021-07-14 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Martin Botka
  Cc: Bjorn Andersson, angelogioacchino.delregno, Michael Turquette,
	linux-kernel, martin.botka1, paul.bouchara, konrad.dybcio,
	marijn.suijten, Stephen Boyd, jamipkettunen, Andy Gross,
	Rob Herring, linux-clk, linux-arm-msm, ~postmarketos/upstreaming,
	devicetree

On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 12:26:22 +0200, Martin Botka wrote:
> Document the newly added compatible for sm6125 rpmcc.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Martin Botka <martin.botka@somainline.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.txt | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 

Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 3/3] rpmcc: Add support for SM6125
  2021-06-29 10:26 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 3/3] rpmcc: Add support for SM6125 Martin Botka
@ 2021-07-27 21:46   ` Stephen Boyd
  2021-07-30 20:07     ` Martin Botka
  2021-07-30 20:20     ` Martin Botka
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Boyd @ 2021-07-27 21:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Martin Botka, martin.botka1
  Cc: ~postmarketos/upstreaming, konrad.dybcio,
	angelogioacchino.delregno, marijn.suijten, jamipkettunen,
	paul.bouchara, Martin Botka, Andy Gross, Bjorn Andersson,
	Michael Turquette, Rob Herring, linux-arm-msm, linux-clk,
	devicetree, linux-kernel

Quoting Martin Botka (2021-06-29 03:26:23)
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
> index 8200c26b968c..51458f740ba0 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
> @@ -1059,6 +1059,61 @@ static const struct rpm_smd_clk_desc rpm_clk_sdm660 = {
>         .num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm660_clks),
>  };
>  
> +/* SM6125 */
> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_BRANCH(sm6125, bi_tcxo, bi_tcxo_ao,
> +                                       QCOM_SMD_RPM_MISC_CLK, 0, 19200000);
> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, cnoc_clk, cnoc_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_BUS_CLK, 1);
> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, bimc_clk, bimc_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_MEM_CLK, 0);

Can we use msm8916_bimc_clk?

> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, snoc_clk, snoc_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_BUS_CLK, 2);
> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_BRANCH(sm6125, qdss_clk, qdss_a_clk,
> +                                       QCOM_SMD_RPM_MISC_CLK, 1, 19200000);
> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, ce1_clk, ce1_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_CE_CLK, 0);

Can we use msm8992_ce1_clk?

> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, ipa_clk, ipa_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_IPA_CLK, 0);

Can we use msm8976_ipa_clk?

> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, qup_clk, qup_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_QUP_CLK, 0);
> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, mmnrt_clk, mmnrt_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_MMAXI_CLK, 0);
> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, mmrt_clk, mmrt_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_MMAXI_CLK, 1);
> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, snoc_periph_clk, snoc_periph_a_clk,
> +                                               QCOM_SMD_RPM_BUS_CLK, 0);
> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, snoc_lpass_clk, snoc_lpass_a_clk,
> +                                               QCOM_SMD_RPM_BUS_CLK, 5);
> +
> +/* SMD_XO_BUFFER */
> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(sm6125, ln_bb_clk1, ln_bb_clk1_a, 1);

msm8916?

> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(sm6125, ln_bb_clk2, ln_bb_clk2_a, 2);

msm8916?

> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(sm6125, ln_bb_clk3, ln_bb_clk3_a, 3);

sdm660?

> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(sm6125, rf_clk1, rf_clk1_a, 4);

msm8916?

> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(sm6125, rf_clk2, rf_clk2_a, 5);

msm8916?

> +
> +static struct clk_smd_rpm *sm6125_clks[] = {
> +       [RPM_SMD_XO_CLK_SRC] = &sm6125_bi_tcxo,
> +       [RPM_SMD_XO_A_CLK_SRC] = &sm6125_bi_tcxo_ao,
> +       [RPM_SMD_SNOC_CLK] = &sm6125_snoc_clk,
> +       [RPM_SMD_SNOC_A_CLK] = &sm6125_snoc_a_clk,
> +       [RPM_SMD_BIMC_CLK] = &sm6125_bimc_clk,
> +       [RPM_SMD_BIMC_A_CLK] = &sm6125_bimc_a_clk,
> +       [RPM_SMD_QDSS_CLK] = &sm6125_qdss_clk,
> +       [RPM_SMD_QDSS_A_CLK] = &sm6125_qdss_a_clk,
> +       [RPM_SMD_RF_CLK1] = &sm6125_rf_clk1,
> +       [RPM_SMD_RF_CLK1_A] = &sm6125_rf_clk1_a,
> +       [RPM_SMD_RF_CLK2] = &sm6125_rf_clk2,
> +       [RPM_SMD_RF_CLK2_A] = &sm6125_rf_clk2_a,
> +       [RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK1] = &sm6125_ln_bb_clk1,
> +       [RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK1_A] = &sm6125_ln_bb_clk1_a,
> +       [RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK2] = &sm6125_ln_bb_clk2,
> +       [RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK2_A] = &sm6125_ln_bb_clk2_a,
> +       [RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK3] = &sm6125_ln_bb_clk3,
> +       [RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK3_A] = &sm6125_ln_bb_clk3_a,
> +       [RPM_SMD_CNOC_CLK] = &sm6125_cnoc_clk,
> +       [RPM_SMD_CNOC_A_CLK] = &sm6125_cnoc_a_clk,
> +       [RPM_SMD_CE1_CLK] = &sm6125_ce1_clk,
> +       [RPM_SMD_CE1_A_CLK] = &sm6125_ce1_a_clk,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct rpm_smd_clk_desc rpm_clk_sm6125 = {
> +       .clks = sm6125_clks,
> +       .num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(sm6125_clks),
> +};
> +
>  static const struct of_device_id rpm_smd_clk_match_table[] = {
>         { .compatible = "qcom,rpmcc-msm8916", .data = &rpm_clk_msm8916 },
>         { .compatible = "qcom,rpmcc-msm8936", .data = &rpm_clk_msm8936 },
> diff --git a/include/linux/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.h b/include/linux/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.h
> index f2645ec52520..b737d7e456e4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.h
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ struct qcom_smd_rpm;
>  #define QCOM_SMD_RPM_NCPA      0x6170636E
>  #define QCOM_SMD_RPM_NCPB      0x6270636E
>  #define QCOM_SMD_RPM_OCMEM_PWR 0x706d636f
> +#define QCOM_SMD_RPM_QUP_CLK   0x00707571
>  #define QCOM_SMD_RPM_QPIC_CLK  0x63697071
>  #define QCOM_SMD_RPM_SMPA      0x61706d73
>  #define QCOM_SMD_RPM_SMPB      0x62706d73

Two patches are adding this in different places.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 1/3] rpmcc: Add sm6125 compatible
  2021-06-29 10:26 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 1/3] rpmcc: Add sm6125 compatible Martin Botka
@ 2021-07-27 21:47   ` Stephen Boyd
  2021-07-30 20:07     ` Martin Botka
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Boyd @ 2021-07-27 21:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Martin Botka, martin.botka1
  Cc: ~postmarketos/upstreaming, konrad.dybcio,
	angelogioacchino.delregno, marijn.suijten, jamipkettunen,
	paul.bouchara, Martin Botka, Andy Gross, Bjorn Andersson,
	Michael Turquette, Rob Herring, linux-arm-msm, linux-clk,
	devicetree, linux-kernel

Quoting Martin Botka (2021-06-29 03:26:21)
> Add a compatible for SM6125 and assing correct data
> 
> Signed-off-by: Martin Botka <martin.botka@somainline.org>
> ---

This patch needs to be combined with the one that introduces
rpm_clk_sm6125.

> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
> index 0e1dfa89489e..8200c26b968c 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
> @@ -1070,6 +1070,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id rpm_smd_clk_match_table[] = {
>         { .compatible = "qcom,rpmcc-msm8998", .data = &rpm_clk_msm8998 },
>         { .compatible = "qcom,rpmcc-qcs404",  .data = &rpm_clk_qcs404  },
>         { .compatible = "qcom,rpmcc-sdm660",  .data = &rpm_clk_sdm660  },
> +       { .compatible = "qcom,rpmcc-sm6125",  .data = &rpm_clk_sm6125  },

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: clk: qcom: smd-rpm: Document SM6125 compatible
  2021-06-29 10:26 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: clk: qcom: smd-rpm: Document SM6125 compatible Martin Botka
  2021-07-14 21:08   ` Rob Herring
@ 2021-07-27 21:48   ` Stephen Boyd
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Boyd @ 2021-07-27 21:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Martin Botka, martin.botka1
  Cc: ~postmarketos/upstreaming, konrad.dybcio,
	angelogioacchino.delregno, marijn.suijten, jamipkettunen,
	paul.bouchara, Martin Botka, Andy Gross, Bjorn Andersson,
	Michael Turquette, Rob Herring, linux-arm-msm, linux-clk,
	devicetree, linux-kernel

Quoting Martin Botka (2021-06-29 03:26:22)
> Document the newly added compatible for sm6125 rpmcc.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Martin Botka <martin.botka@somainline.org>
> ---

Applied to clk-next

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 3/3] rpmcc: Add support for SM6125
  2021-07-27 21:46   ` Stephen Boyd
@ 2021-07-30 20:07     ` Martin Botka
  2021-07-30 20:20     ` Martin Botka
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Martin Botka @ 2021-07-30 20:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Boyd
  Cc: martin.botka1, ~postmarketos/upstreaming, konrad.dybcio,
	angelogioacchino.delregno, marijn.suijten, jamipkettunen,
	paul.bouchara, Andy Gross, Bjorn Andersson, Michael Turquette,
	Rob Herring, linux-arm-msm, linux-clk, devicetree, linux-kernel



On Tue, Jul 27 2021 at 02:46:39 PM -0700, Stephen Boyd 
<sboyd@kernel.org> wrote:
> Quoting Martin Botka (2021-06-29 03:26:23)
>>  diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c 
>> b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
>>  index 8200c26b968c..51458f740ba0 100644
>>  --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
>>  +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
>>  @@ -1059,6 +1059,61 @@ static const struct rpm_smd_clk_desc 
>> rpm_clk_sdm660 = {
>>          .num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm660_clks),
>>   };
>> 
>>  +/* SM6125 */
>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_BRANCH(sm6125, bi_tcxo, bi_tcxo_ao,
>>  +                                       QCOM_SMD_RPM_MISC_CLK, 0, 
>> 19200000);
>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, cnoc_clk, cnoc_a_clk, 
>> QCOM_SMD_RPM_BUS_CLK, 1);
>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, bimc_clk, bimc_a_clk, 
>> QCOM_SMD_RPM_MEM_CLK, 0);
> 
> Can we use msm8916_bimc_clk?
> 
>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, snoc_clk, snoc_a_clk, 
>> QCOM_SMD_RPM_BUS_CLK, 2);
>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_BRANCH(sm6125, qdss_clk, qdss_a_clk,
>>  +                                       QCOM_SMD_RPM_MISC_CLK, 1, 
>> 19200000);
>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, ce1_clk, ce1_a_clk, 
>> QCOM_SMD_RPM_CE_CLK, 0);
> 
> Can we use msm8992_ce1_clk?
> 
>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, ipa_clk, ipa_a_clk, 
>> QCOM_SMD_RPM_IPA_CLK, 0);
> 
> Can we use msm8976_ipa_clk?
> 
>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, qup_clk, qup_a_clk, 
>> QCOM_SMD_RPM_QUP_CLK, 0);
>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, mmnrt_clk, mmnrt_a_clk, 
>> QCOM_SMD_RPM_MMAXI_CLK, 0);
>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, mmrt_clk, mmrt_a_clk, 
>> QCOM_SMD_RPM_MMAXI_CLK, 1);
>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, snoc_periph_clk, snoc_periph_a_clk,
>>  +                                               
>> QCOM_SMD_RPM_BUS_CLK, 0);
>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, snoc_lpass_clk, snoc_lpass_a_clk,
>>  +                                               
>> QCOM_SMD_RPM_BUS_CLK, 5);
>>  +
>>  +/* SMD_XO_BUFFER */
>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(sm6125, ln_bb_clk1, ln_bb_clk1_a, 1);
> 
> msm8916?
> 
>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(sm6125, ln_bb_clk2, ln_bb_clk2_a, 2);
> 
> msm8916?
> 
>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(sm6125, ln_bb_clk3, ln_bb_clk3_a, 3);
> 
> sdm660?
> 
>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(sm6125, rf_clk1, rf_clk1_a, 4);
> 
> msm8916?
> 
>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(sm6125, rf_clk2, rf_clk2_a, 5);
> 
> msm8916?
> 

Will do to all.

>>  +
>>  +static struct clk_smd_rpm *sm6125_clks[] = {
>>  +       [RPM_SMD_XO_CLK_SRC] = &sm6125_bi_tcxo,
>>  +       [RPM_SMD_XO_A_CLK_SRC] = &sm6125_bi_tcxo_ao,
>>  +       [RPM_SMD_SNOC_CLK] = &sm6125_snoc_clk,
>>  +       [RPM_SMD_SNOC_A_CLK] = &sm6125_snoc_a_clk,
>>  +       [RPM_SMD_BIMC_CLK] = &sm6125_bimc_clk,
>>  +       [RPM_SMD_BIMC_A_CLK] = &sm6125_bimc_a_clk,
>>  +       [RPM_SMD_QDSS_CLK] = &sm6125_qdss_clk,
>>  +       [RPM_SMD_QDSS_A_CLK] = &sm6125_qdss_a_clk,
>>  +       [RPM_SMD_RF_CLK1] = &sm6125_rf_clk1,
>>  +       [RPM_SMD_RF_CLK1_A] = &sm6125_rf_clk1_a,
>>  +       [RPM_SMD_RF_CLK2] = &sm6125_rf_clk2,
>>  +       [RPM_SMD_RF_CLK2_A] = &sm6125_rf_clk2_a,
>>  +       [RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK1] = &sm6125_ln_bb_clk1,
>>  +       [RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK1_A] = &sm6125_ln_bb_clk1_a,
>>  +       [RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK2] = &sm6125_ln_bb_clk2,
>>  +       [RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK2_A] = &sm6125_ln_bb_clk2_a,
>>  +       [RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK3] = &sm6125_ln_bb_clk3,
>>  +       [RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK3_A] = &sm6125_ln_bb_clk3_a,
>>  +       [RPM_SMD_CNOC_CLK] = &sm6125_cnoc_clk,
>>  +       [RPM_SMD_CNOC_A_CLK] = &sm6125_cnoc_a_clk,
>>  +       [RPM_SMD_CE1_CLK] = &sm6125_ce1_clk,
>>  +       [RPM_SMD_CE1_A_CLK] = &sm6125_ce1_a_clk,
>>  +};
>>  +
>>  +static const struct rpm_smd_clk_desc rpm_clk_sm6125 = {
>>  +       .clks = sm6125_clks,
>>  +       .num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(sm6125_clks),
>>  +};
>>  +
>>   static const struct of_device_id rpm_smd_clk_match_table[] = {
>>          { .compatible = "qcom,rpmcc-msm8916", .data = 
>> &rpm_clk_msm8916 },
>>          { .compatible = "qcom,rpmcc-msm8936", .data = 
>> &rpm_clk_msm8936 },
>>  diff --git a/include/linux/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.h 
>> b/include/linux/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.h
>>  index f2645ec52520..b737d7e456e4 100644
>>  --- a/include/linux/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.h
>>  +++ b/include/linux/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.h
>>  @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ struct qcom_smd_rpm;
>>   #define QCOM_SMD_RPM_NCPA      0x6170636E
>>   #define QCOM_SMD_RPM_NCPB      0x6270636E
>>   #define QCOM_SMD_RPM_OCMEM_PWR 0x706d636f
>>  +#define QCOM_SMD_RPM_QUP_CLK   0x00707571
>>   #define QCOM_SMD_RPM_QPIC_CLK  0x63697071
>>   #define QCOM_SMD_RPM_SMPA      0x61706d73
>>   #define QCOM_SMD_RPM_SMPB      0x62706d73
> 
> Two patches are adding this in different places.

Im aware. I will argue tho that adding it
in alphabetical order is the correct way to go here.
Thats how the rest is done except the last 4 defines
in that block which probably should be moved into
their alphabetical order as well
(They do not follow address ordering).






^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 1/3] rpmcc: Add sm6125 compatible
  2021-07-27 21:47   ` Stephen Boyd
@ 2021-07-30 20:07     ` Martin Botka
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Martin Botka @ 2021-07-30 20:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Boyd
  Cc: martin.botka1, ~postmarketos/upstreaming, konrad.dybcio,
	angelogioacchino.delregno, marijn.suijten, jamipkettunen,
	paul.bouchara, Andy Gross, Bjorn Andersson, Michael Turquette,
	Rob Herring, linux-arm-msm, linux-clk, devicetree, linux-kernel



On Tue, Jul 27 2021 at 02:47:44 PM -0700, Stephen Boyd 
<sboyd@kernel.org> wrote:
> Quoting Martin Botka (2021-06-29 03:26:21)
>>  Add a compatible for SM6125 and assing correct data
>> 
>>  Signed-off-by: Martin Botka <martin.botka@somainline.org>
>>  ---
> 
> This patch needs to be combined with the one that introduces
> rpm_clk_sm6125.
> 
>>  +       { .compatible = "qcom,rpmcc-sm6125",  .data = 
>> &rpm_clk_sm6125  },
>>  diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c 
>> b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
>>  index 0e1dfa89489e..8200c26b968c 100644
>>  --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
>>  +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
>>  @@ -1070,6 +1070,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id 
>> rpm_smd_clk_match_table[] = {
>>          { .compatible = "qcom,rpmcc-msm8998", .data = 
>> &rpm_clk_msm8998 },
>>          { .compatible = "qcom,rpmcc-qcs404",  .data = 
>> &rpm_clk_qcs404  },
>>          { .compatible = "qcom,rpmcc-sdm660",  .data = 
>> &rpm_clk_sdm660  },
> 
OK.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 3/3] rpmcc: Add support for SM6125
  2021-07-27 21:46   ` Stephen Boyd
  2021-07-30 20:07     ` Martin Botka
@ 2021-07-30 20:20     ` Martin Botka
  2021-07-30 20:23       ` Martin Botka
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Martin Botka @ 2021-07-30 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Boyd
  Cc: martin.botka1, ~postmarketos/upstreaming, konrad.dybcio,
	angelogioacchino.delregno, marijn.suijten, jamipkettunen,
	paul.bouchara, Andy Gross, Bjorn Andersson, Michael Turquette,
	Rob Herring, linux-arm-msm, linux-clk, devicetree, linux-kernel

Actually not all.

On Tue, Jul 27 2021 at 02:46:39 PM -0700, Stephen Boyd 
<sboyd@kernel.org> wrote:
> Quoting Martin Botka (2021-06-29 03:26:23)
>>  diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c 
>> b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
>>  index 8200c26b968c..51458f740ba0 100644
>>  --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
>>  +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
>>  @@ -1059,6 +1059,61 @@ static const struct rpm_smd_clk_desc 
>> rpm_clk_sdm660 = {
>>          .num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm660_clks),
>>   };
>> 
>>  +/* SM6125 */
>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_BRANCH(sm6125, bi_tcxo, bi_tcxo_ao,
>>  +                                       QCOM_SMD_RPM_MISC_CLK, 0, 
>> 19200000);
>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, cnoc_clk, cnoc_a_clk, 
>> QCOM_SMD_RPM_BUS_CLK, 1);
>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, bimc_clk, bimc_a_clk, 
>> QCOM_SMD_RPM_MEM_CLK, 0);
> 
> Can we use msm8916_bimc_clk?
> 
>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, snoc_clk, snoc_a_clk, 
>> QCOM_SMD_RPM_BUS_CLK, 2);
>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_BRANCH(sm6125, qdss_clk, qdss_a_clk,
>>  +                                       QCOM_SMD_RPM_MISC_CLK, 1, 
>> 19200000);
>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, ce1_clk, ce1_a_clk, 
>> QCOM_SMD_RPM_CE_CLK, 0);
> 
> Can we use msm8992_ce1_clk?
> 
>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, ipa_clk, ipa_a_clk, 
>> QCOM_SMD_RPM_IPA_CLK, 0);
> 
> Can we use msm8976_ipa_clk?
> 
>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, qup_clk, qup_a_clk, 
>> QCOM_SMD_RPM_QUP_CLK, 0);
>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, mmnrt_clk, mmnrt_a_clk, 
>> QCOM_SMD_RPM_MMAXI_CLK, 0);
>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, mmrt_clk, mmrt_a_clk, 
>> QCOM_SMD_RPM_MMAXI_CLK, 1);
>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, snoc_periph_clk, snoc_periph_a_clk,
>>  +                                               
>> QCOM_SMD_RPM_BUS_CLK, 0);
>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, snoc_lpass_clk, snoc_lpass_a_clk,
>>  +                                               
>> QCOM_SMD_RPM_BUS_CLK, 5);
>>  +
>>  +/* SMD_XO_BUFFER */
>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(sm6125, ln_bb_clk1, ln_bb_clk1_a, 1);
> 
> msm8916?

msm8916 one is not ln_.

> 
>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(sm6125, ln_bb_clk2, ln_bb_clk2_a, 2);
> 
> msm8916?

Same reason.

> 
>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(sm6125, ln_bb_clk3, ln_bb_clk3_a, 3);
> 
> sdm660?
> 
>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(sm6125, rf_clk1, rf_clk1_a, 4);
> 
> msm8916?
> 
>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(sm6125, rf_clk2, rf_clk2_a, 5);
> 
> msm8916?
> 
>>  +
>>  +static struct clk_smd_rpm *sm6125_clks[] = {
>>  +       [RPM_SMD_XO_CLK_SRC] = &sm6125_bi_tcxo,
>>  +       [RPM_SMD_XO_A_CLK_SRC] = &sm6125_bi_tcxo_ao,
>>  +       [RPM_SMD_SNOC_CLK] = &sm6125_snoc_clk,
>>  +       [RPM_SMD_SNOC_A_CLK] = &sm6125_snoc_a_clk,
>>  +       [RPM_SMD_BIMC_CLK] = &sm6125_bimc_clk,
>>  +       [RPM_SMD_BIMC_A_CLK] = &sm6125_bimc_a_clk,
>>  +       [RPM_SMD_QDSS_CLK] = &sm6125_qdss_clk,
>>  +       [RPM_SMD_QDSS_A_CLK] = &sm6125_qdss_a_clk,
>>  +       [RPM_SMD_RF_CLK1] = &sm6125_rf_clk1,
>>  +       [RPM_SMD_RF_CLK1_A] = &sm6125_rf_clk1_a,
>>  +       [RPM_SMD_RF_CLK2] = &sm6125_rf_clk2,
>>  +       [RPM_SMD_RF_CLK2_A] = &sm6125_rf_clk2_a,
>>  +       [RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK1] = &sm6125_ln_bb_clk1,
>>  +       [RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK1_A] = &sm6125_ln_bb_clk1_a,
>>  +       [RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK2] = &sm6125_ln_bb_clk2,
>>  +       [RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK2_A] = &sm6125_ln_bb_clk2_a,
>>  +       [RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK3] = &sm6125_ln_bb_clk3,
>>  +       [RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK3_A] = &sm6125_ln_bb_clk3_a,
>>  +       [RPM_SMD_CNOC_CLK] = &sm6125_cnoc_clk,
>>  +       [RPM_SMD_CNOC_A_CLK] = &sm6125_cnoc_a_clk,
>>  +       [RPM_SMD_CE1_CLK] = &sm6125_ce1_clk,
>>  +       [RPM_SMD_CE1_A_CLK] = &sm6125_ce1_a_clk,
>>  +};
>>  +
>>  +static const struct rpm_smd_clk_desc rpm_clk_sm6125 = {
>>  +       .clks = sm6125_clks,
>>  +       .num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(sm6125_clks),
>>  +};
>>  +
>>   static const struct of_device_id rpm_smd_clk_match_table[] = {
>>          { .compatible = "qcom,rpmcc-msm8916", .data = 
>> &rpm_clk_msm8916 },
>>          { .compatible = "qcom,rpmcc-msm8936", .data = 
>> &rpm_clk_msm8936 },
>>  diff --git a/include/linux/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.h 
>> b/include/linux/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.h
>>  index f2645ec52520..b737d7e456e4 100644
>>  --- a/include/linux/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.h
>>  +++ b/include/linux/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.h
>>  @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ struct qcom_smd_rpm;
>>   #define QCOM_SMD_RPM_NCPA      0x6170636E
>>   #define QCOM_SMD_RPM_NCPB      0x6270636E
>>   #define QCOM_SMD_RPM_OCMEM_PWR 0x706d636f
>>  +#define QCOM_SMD_RPM_QUP_CLK   0x00707571
>>   #define QCOM_SMD_RPM_QPIC_CLK  0x63697071
>>   #define QCOM_SMD_RPM_SMPA      0x61706d73
>>   #define QCOM_SMD_RPM_SMPB      0x62706d73
> 
> Two patches are adding this in different places.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 3/3] rpmcc: Add support for SM6125
  2021-07-30 20:20     ` Martin Botka
@ 2021-07-30 20:23       ` Martin Botka
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Martin Botka @ 2021-07-30 20:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Boyd
  Cc: martin.botka1, ~postmarketos/upstreaming, konrad.dybcio,
	angelogioacchino.delregno, marijn.suijten, jamipkettunen,
	paul.bouchara, Andy Gross, Bjorn Andersson, Michael Turquette,
	Rob Herring, linux-arm-msm, linux-clk, devicetree, linux-kernel

Completely ignore it. Brain fart.

On Fri, Jul 30 2021 at 10:20:11 PM +0200, Martin Botka 
<martin.botka@somainline.org> wrote:
> Actually not all.
> 
> On Tue, Jul 27 2021 at 02:46:39 PM -0700, Stephen Boyd 
> <sboyd@kernel.org> wrote:
>> Quoting Martin Botka (2021-06-29 03:26:23)
>>>  diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c 
>>> \x7f\x7fb/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
>>>  index 8200c26b968c..51458f740ba0 100644
>>>  --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
>>>  +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
>>>  @@ -1059,6 +1059,61 @@ static const struct rpm_smd_clk_desc 
>>> \x7f\x7frpm_clk_sdm660 = {
>>>          .num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm660_clks),
>>>   };
>>> 
>>>  +/* SM6125 */
>>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_BRANCH(sm6125, bi_tcxo, bi_tcxo_ao,
>>>  +                                       QCOM_SMD_RPM_MISC_CLK, 0, 
>>> \x7f\x7f19200000);
>>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, cnoc_clk, cnoc_a_clk, 
>>> \x7f\x7fQCOM_SMD_RPM_BUS_CLK, 1);
>>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, bimc_clk, bimc_a_clk, 
>>> \x7f\x7fQCOM_SMD_RPM_MEM_CLK, 0);
>> 
>> Can we use msm8916_bimc_clk?
>> 
>>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, snoc_clk, snoc_a_clk, 
>>> \x7f\x7fQCOM_SMD_RPM_BUS_CLK, 2);
>>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_BRANCH(sm6125, qdss_clk, qdss_a_clk,
>>>  +                                       QCOM_SMD_RPM_MISC_CLK, 1, 
>>> \x7f\x7f19200000);
>>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, ce1_clk, ce1_a_clk, 
>>> \x7f\x7fQCOM_SMD_RPM_CE_CLK, 0);
>> 
>> Can we use msm8992_ce1_clk?
>> 
>>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, ipa_clk, ipa_a_clk, 
>>> \x7f\x7fQCOM_SMD_RPM_IPA_CLK, 0);
>> 
>> Can we use msm8976_ipa_clk?
>> 
>>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, qup_clk, qup_a_clk, 
>>> \x7f\x7fQCOM_SMD_RPM_QUP_CLK, 0);
>>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, mmnrt_clk, mmnrt_a_clk, 
>>> \x7f\x7fQCOM_SMD_RPM_MMAXI_CLK, 0);
>>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, mmrt_clk, mmrt_a_clk, 
>>> \x7f\x7fQCOM_SMD_RPM_MMAXI_CLK, 1);
>>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, snoc_periph_clk, snoc_periph_a_clk,
>>>  +                                               
>>> \x7f\x7fQCOM_SMD_RPM_BUS_CLK, 0);
>>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, snoc_lpass_clk, snoc_lpass_a_clk,
>>>  +                                               
>>> \x7f\x7fQCOM_SMD_RPM_BUS_CLK, 5);
>>>  +
>>>  +/* SMD_XO_BUFFER */
>>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(sm6125, ln_bb_clk1, ln_bb_clk1_a, 1);
>> 
>> msm8916?
> 
> msm8916 one is not ln_.
> 
>> 
>>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(sm6125, ln_bb_clk2, ln_bb_clk2_a, 2);
>> 
>> msm8916?
> 
> Same reason.
> 
>> 
>>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(sm6125, ln_bb_clk3, ln_bb_clk3_a, 3);
>> 
>> sdm660?
>> 
>>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(sm6125, rf_clk1, rf_clk1_a, 4);
>> 
>> msm8916?
>> 
>>>  +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(sm6125, rf_clk2, rf_clk2_a, 5);
>> 
>> msm8916?
>> 
>>>  +
>>>  +static struct clk_smd_rpm *sm6125_clks[] = {
>>>  +       [RPM_SMD_XO_CLK_SRC] = &sm6125_bi_tcxo,
>>>  +       [RPM_SMD_XO_A_CLK_SRC] = &sm6125_bi_tcxo_ao,
>>>  +       [RPM_SMD_SNOC_CLK] = &sm6125_snoc_clk,
>>>  +       [RPM_SMD_SNOC_A_CLK] = &sm6125_snoc_a_clk,
>>>  +       [RPM_SMD_BIMC_CLK] = &sm6125_bimc_clk,
>>>  +       [RPM_SMD_BIMC_A_CLK] = &sm6125_bimc_a_clk,
>>>  +       [RPM_SMD_QDSS_CLK] = &sm6125_qdss_clk,
>>>  +       [RPM_SMD_QDSS_A_CLK] = &sm6125_qdss_a_clk,
>>>  +       [RPM_SMD_RF_CLK1] = &sm6125_rf_clk1,
>>>  +       [RPM_SMD_RF_CLK1_A] = &sm6125_rf_clk1_a,
>>>  +       [RPM_SMD_RF_CLK2] = &sm6125_rf_clk2,
>>>  +       [RPM_SMD_RF_CLK2_A] = &sm6125_rf_clk2_a,
>>>  +       [RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK1] = &sm6125_ln_bb_clk1,
>>>  +       [RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK1_A] = &sm6125_ln_bb_clk1_a,
>>>  +       [RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK2] = &sm6125_ln_bb_clk2,
>>>  +       [RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK2_A] = &sm6125_ln_bb_clk2_a,
>>>  +       [RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK3] = &sm6125_ln_bb_clk3,
>>>  +       [RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK3_A] = &sm6125_ln_bb_clk3_a,
>>>  +       [RPM_SMD_CNOC_CLK] = &sm6125_cnoc_clk,
>>>  +       [RPM_SMD_CNOC_A_CLK] = &sm6125_cnoc_a_clk,
>>>  +       [RPM_SMD_CE1_CLK] = &sm6125_ce1_clk,
>>>  +       [RPM_SMD_CE1_A_CLK] = &sm6125_ce1_a_clk,
>>>  +};
>>>  +
>>>  +static const struct rpm_smd_clk_desc rpm_clk_sm6125 = {
>>>  +       .clks = sm6125_clks,
>>>  +       .num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(sm6125_clks),
>>>  +};
>>>  +
>>>   static const struct of_device_id rpm_smd_clk_match_table[] = {
>>>          { .compatible = "qcom,rpmcc-msm8916", .data = 
>>> \x7f\x7f&rpm_clk_msm8916 },
>>>          { .compatible = "qcom,rpmcc-msm8936", .data = 
>>> \x7f\x7f&rpm_clk_msm8936 },
>>>  diff --git a/include/linux/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.h 
>>> \x7f\x7fb/include/linux/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.h
>>>  index f2645ec52520..b737d7e456e4 100644
>>>  --- a/include/linux/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.h
>>>  +++ b/include/linux/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.h
>>>  @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ struct qcom_smd_rpm;
>>>   #define QCOM_SMD_RPM_NCPA      0x6170636E
>>>   #define QCOM_SMD_RPM_NCPB      0x6270636E
>>>   #define QCOM_SMD_RPM_OCMEM_PWR 0x706d636f
>>>  +#define QCOM_SMD_RPM_QUP_CLK   0x00707571
>>>   #define QCOM_SMD_RPM_QPIC_CLK  0x63697071
>>>   #define QCOM_SMD_RPM_SMPA      0x61706d73
>>>   #define QCOM_SMD_RPM_SMPB      0x62706d73
>> 
>> Two patches are adding this in different places.
> 



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [RESEND PATCH v2 0/3] RPMCC for SM6125
@ 2021-06-29 10:24 Martin Botka
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Martin Botka @ 2021-06-29 10:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  Cc: ~postmarketos/upstreaming, konrad.dybcio,
	angelogioacchino.delregno, marijn.suijten, jamipkettunen,
	paul.bouchara, Martin Botka, Andy Gross, Bjorn Andersson,
	Michael Turquette, Stephen Boyd, Rob Herring, linux-arm-msm,
	linux-clk, devicetree, linux-kernel

This patch series adds support for the
RPMCC found in SM6125 SoC.

In this resend i didnt include 2 patches
that were already merged.

Changes in v2:
Add commit description to all the patches

Martin Botka (3):
  rpmcc: Add sm6125 compatible
  dt-bindings: clk: qcom: smd-rpm: Document SM6125 compatible
  rpmcc: Add support for SM6125

 .../devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.txt  |  1 +
 drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c                | 56 +++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.h              |  1 +
 3 files changed, 58 insertions(+)

-- 
2.32.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-07-30 20:24 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-06-29 10:26 [RESEND PATCH v2 0/3] RPMCC for SM6125 Martin Botka
2021-06-29 10:26 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 1/3] rpmcc: Add sm6125 compatible Martin Botka
2021-07-27 21:47   ` Stephen Boyd
2021-07-30 20:07     ` Martin Botka
2021-06-29 10:26 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: clk: qcom: smd-rpm: Document SM6125 compatible Martin Botka
2021-07-14 21:08   ` Rob Herring
2021-07-27 21:48   ` Stephen Boyd
2021-06-29 10:26 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 3/3] rpmcc: Add support for SM6125 Martin Botka
2021-07-27 21:46   ` Stephen Boyd
2021-07-30 20:07     ` Martin Botka
2021-07-30 20:20     ` Martin Botka
2021-07-30 20:23       ` Martin Botka
2021-06-29 10:27 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 0/3] RPMCC " Martin Botka
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-06-29 10:24 Martin Botka

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).