LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>
To: Dipen Patel <dipenp@nvidia.com>
Cc: thierry.reding@gmail.com, jonathanh@nvidia.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
	bgolaszewski@baylibre.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 08/11] gpiolib: cdev: Add hardware timestamp clock type
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 22:24:33 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210701142433.GC34285@sol> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210625235532.19575-9-dipenp@nvidia.com>

On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 04:55:29PM -0700, Dipen Patel wrote:
> This patch adds new clock type for the GPIO controller which can
> timestamp gpio lines using hardware means. To expose such
> functionalities to the userspace, code has been added in this patch
> where during line create call, it checks for new clock type and if
> requested, calls hardware timestamp related API from gpiolib.c.
> During line change event, it retrieves timestamp in nano seconds by
> calling gpiod_get_hw_timestamp API from gpiolib.c. At the line release,
> it disables this functionality by calling gpiod_hw_timestamp_control.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dipen Patel <dipenp@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  include/uapi/linux/gpio.h   |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c
> index 1631727bf0da..9f98c727e937 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c
> @@ -518,6 +518,7 @@ struct linereq {
>  	 GPIO_V2_LINE_DRIVE_FLAGS | \
>  	 GPIO_V2_LINE_EDGE_FLAGS | \
>  	 GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_EVENT_CLOCK_REALTIME | \
> +	 GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_EVENT_CLOCK_HARDWARE | \
>  	 GPIO_V2_LINE_BIAS_FLAGS)
>  
>  static void linereq_put_event(struct linereq *lr,
> @@ -540,9 +541,20 @@ static void linereq_put_event(struct linereq *lr,
>  
>  static u64 line_event_timestamp(struct line *line)
>  {
> +	bool block;
> +
>  	if (test_bit(FLAG_EVENT_CLOCK_REALTIME, &line->desc->flags))
>  		return ktime_get_real_ns();
>  
> +	if (test_bit(FLAG_EVENT_CLOCK_HARDWARE, &line->desc->flags)) {
> +		if (irq_count())
> +			block = false;
> +		else
> +			block = true;
> +
> +		return gpiod_get_hw_timestamp(line->desc, block);
> +	}
> +

Use in_task() instead of block?

>  	return ktime_get_ns();
>  }
>  
> @@ -828,6 +840,7 @@ static int edge_detector_setup(struct line *line,
>  		return ret;
>  
>  	line->irq = irq;
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  

Remove gratuitous whitespace changes.
If you dislike the formatting then suggest it in a separate patch.

> @@ -891,7 +904,6 @@ static int gpio_v2_line_flags_validate(u64 flags)
>  	/* Return an error if an unknown flag is set */
>  	if (flags & ~GPIO_V2_LINE_VALID_FLAGS)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> -
>  	/*
>  	 * Do not allow both INPUT and OUTPUT flags to be set as they are
>  	 * contradictory.
> @@ -900,6 +912,14 @@ static int gpio_v2_line_flags_validate(u64 flags)
>  	    (flags & GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_OUTPUT))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  

Same here.

> +	/*
> +	 * Do not mix with any other clocks if hardware assisted timestamp is
> +	 * asked.
> +	 */
> +	if ((flags & GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_EVENT_CLOCK_REALTIME) &&
> +	    (flags & GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_EVENT_CLOCK_HARDWARE))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +

The comment is very hw timestamp centric. It should just be something
along the lines of "only allow one event clock source".

>  	/* Edge detection requires explicit input. */
>  	if ((flags & GPIO_V2_LINE_EDGE_FLAGS) &&
>  	    !(flags & GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_INPUT))
> @@ -992,6 +1012,8 @@ static void gpio_v2_line_config_flags_to_desc_flags(u64 flags,
>  
>  	assign_bit(FLAG_EVENT_CLOCK_REALTIME, flagsp,
>  		   flags & GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_EVENT_CLOCK_REALTIME);
> +	assign_bit(FLAG_EVENT_CLOCK_HARDWARE, flagsp,
> +		   flags & GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_EVENT_CLOCK_HARDWARE);
>  }
>  
>  static long linereq_get_values(struct linereq *lr, void __user *ip)
> @@ -1139,6 +1161,18 @@ static long linereq_set_config_unlocked(struct linereq *lr,
>  			int val = gpio_v2_line_config_output_value(lc, i);
>  
>  			edge_detector_stop(&lr->lines[i]);
> +
> +			/*
> +			 * Assuming line was input before and hardware
> +			 * assisted timestamp only timestamps the input
> +			 * lines.
> +			 */
> +			if (gpiod_is_hw_timestamp_enabled(desc)) {
> +				ret = gpiod_hw_timestamp_control(desc, false);
> +				if (ret)
> +					return ret;
> +			}
> +

So if you fail to disable the hw timestamp then you fail the set_config?
Does that make sense?
It should be impossible to fail, as per the preceding edge_detector_stop(),
or any failure in this context is irrelevant and so can be ignored.

>  			ret = gpiod_direction_output(desc, val);
>  			if (ret)
>  				return ret;
> @@ -1152,6 +1186,13 @@ static long linereq_set_config_unlocked(struct linereq *lr,
>  					polarity_change);
>  			if (ret)
>  				return ret;
> +
> +			/* Check if new config sets hardware assisted clock */
> +			if (flags & GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_EVENT_CLOCK_HARDWARE) {
> +				ret = gpiod_hw_timestamp_control(desc, true);
> +				if (ret)
> +					return ret;
> +			}
>  		}
>  

The error code here can come from the pinctrl timestamp_control(), so it
should be sanitised before being returned to userspace.

>  		blocking_notifier_call_chain(&desc->gdev->notifier,
> @@ -1281,8 +1322,12 @@ static void linereq_free(struct linereq *lr)
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < lr->num_lines; i++) {
>  		edge_detector_stop(&lr->lines[i]);
> -		if (lr->lines[i].desc)
> +		if (lr->lines[i].desc) {
> +			if (gpiod_is_hw_timestamp_enabled(lr->lines[i].desc))
> +				gpiod_hw_timestamp_control(lr->lines[i].desc,
> +							   false);
>  			gpiod_free(lr->lines[i].desc);
> +		}

Potential race on gpiod_is_hw_timestamp_enabled() and the call to
gpiod_hw_timestamp_control()?
Why not put the gpiod_is_hw_timestamp_enabled() check inside
gpiod_hw_timestamp_control()?

And the gpiod_hw_timestamp_control() call should be moved inside
gpiod_free(), or more correctly gpiod_free_commit().
i.e. whenever you free the gpio you release any associated hw timestamp.

>  	}
>  	kfifo_free(&lr->events);
>  	kfree(lr->label);
> @@ -1409,6 +1454,15 @@ static int linereq_create(struct gpio_device *gdev, void __user *ip)
>  					flags & GPIO_V2_LINE_EDGE_FLAGS);
>  			if (ret)
>  				goto out_free_linereq;
> +
> +			/*
> +			 * Check if hardware assisted timestamp is requested
> +			 */
> +			if (flags & GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_EVENT_CLOCK_HARDWARE) {
> +				ret = gpiod_hw_timestamp_control(desc, true);
> +				if (ret)
> +					goto out_free_linereq;
> +			}
>  		}
>  

Comment can fit on one line, and probably isn't even necessary - the
code is clear enough.

>  		blocking_notifier_call_chain(&desc->gdev->notifier,
> @@ -1956,8 +2010,15 @@ static void gpio_desc_to_lineinfo(struct gpio_desc *desc,
>  	if (test_bit(FLAG_EDGE_FALLING, &desc->flags))
>  		info->flags |= GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_EDGE_FALLING;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Practically it is possible that user will want both the real time
> +	 * and hardware timestamps on GPIO events, for now however lets just
> +	 * work with either clocks
> +	 */
>  	if (test_bit(FLAG_EVENT_CLOCK_REALTIME, &desc->flags))
>  		info->flags |= GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_EVENT_CLOCK_REALTIME;
> +	else if (test_bit(FLAG_EVENT_CLOCK_HARDWARE, &desc->flags))
> +		info->flags |= GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_EVENT_CLOCK_HARDWARE;
>

If there is any need or intent to support multiple clock sources then
avoid creeping API changes and add it now.
Either way, drop the comment.

>  	debounce_period_us = READ_ONCE(desc->debounce_period_us);
>  	if (debounce_period_us) {
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/gpio.h b/include/uapi/linux/gpio.h
> index eaaea3d8e6b4..d360545b4c21 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/gpio.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/gpio.h
> @@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ enum gpio_v2_line_flag {
>  	GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_BIAS_PULL_DOWN	= _BITULL(9),
>  	GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_BIAS_DISABLED		= _BITULL(10),
>  	GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_EVENT_CLOCK_REALTIME	= _BITULL(11),
> +	GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_EVENT_CLOCK_HARDWARE	= _BITULL(12),
>  };
>  
>  /**
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

Cheers,
Kent.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-01 14:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-25 23:55 [RFC 00/11] Intro to Hardware timestamping engine Dipen Patel
2021-06-25 23:55 ` [RFC 01/11] Documentation: Add HTE subsystem guide Dipen Patel
2021-07-04 18:55   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-07-27 23:44     ` Dipen Patel
2021-08-01 15:24       ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-06-25 23:55 ` [RFC 02/11] drivers: Add HTE subsystem Dipen Patel
2021-06-27 17:40   ` Randy Dunlap
2021-07-04 20:15   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-07-04 20:45     ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-07-28  5:12       ` Dipen Patel
2021-08-01 16:48         ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-07-28  4:38     ` Dipen Patel
2021-08-01 16:13       ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-09-14  5:43         ` Dipen Patel
2021-09-26 15:42           ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-07-05  7:30   ` Greg KH
2021-07-28  0:34     ` Dipen Patel
2021-06-25 23:55 ` [RFC 03/11] hte: Add tegra194 HTE kernel provider Dipen Patel
2021-07-01 14:21   ` Kent Gibson
2021-07-28 23:59     ` Dipen Patel
2021-07-30  7:01       ` Dipen Patel
2021-07-31 15:43       ` Kent Gibson
2021-08-03 22:40         ` Dipen Patel
2021-08-03 23:02           ` Kent Gibson
2021-08-07  2:41         ` Dipen Patel
2021-08-07  3:07           ` Kent Gibson
2021-08-07  4:52             ` Dipen Patel
2021-08-07  4:51               ` Kent Gibson
2021-08-07  5:35                 ` Dipen Patel
2021-08-07  5:42                   ` Kent Gibson
2021-08-07  5:47                   ` Dipen Patel
2021-07-04 20:27   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-07-29  2:42     ` Dipen Patel
2021-07-08 23:33   ` Michał Mirosław
2021-07-29  2:43     ` Dipen Patel
2021-06-25 23:55 ` [RFC 04/11] dt-bindings: Add HTE bindings Dipen Patel
2021-06-27 10:56   ` Linus Walleij
2021-07-30  1:32     ` Dipen Patel
2021-07-01 14:02   ` Rob Herring
2021-07-30  1:56     ` Dipen Patel
2021-07-01 15:54   ` Rob Herring
2021-07-30  1:58     ` Dipen Patel
2021-06-25 23:55 ` [RFC 05/11] hte: Add Tegra194 IRQ HTE test driver Dipen Patel
2021-06-27 17:42   ` Randy Dunlap
2021-06-25 23:55 ` [RFC 06/11] gpiolib: Add HTE support Dipen Patel
2021-06-27 11:41   ` Linus Walleij
2021-07-01 14:24   ` Kent Gibson
2021-07-30  2:25     ` Dipen Patel
2021-07-31  5:13       ` Kent Gibson
2021-06-25 23:55 ` [RFC 07/11] gpio: tegra186: Add HTE in gpio-tegra186 driver Dipen Patel
2021-06-25 23:55 ` [RFC 08/11] gpiolib: cdev: Add hardware timestamp clock type Dipen Patel
2021-06-27 11:38   ` Linus Walleij
2021-06-27 11:49   ` Linus Walleij
2021-07-30  3:16     ` Dipen Patel
2021-07-01 14:24   ` Kent Gibson [this message]
2021-07-30  3:07     ` Dipen Patel
2021-07-31  6:05       ` Kent Gibson
2021-08-03 22:41         ` Dipen Patel
2021-08-03 22:38           ` Kent Gibson
2021-07-09  8:30   ` Jon Hunter
2021-07-30  2:33     ` Dipen Patel
2021-08-03 16:42       ` Jon Hunter
2021-08-03 22:51         ` Dipen Patel
2021-08-03 23:09           ` Kent Gibson
2021-06-25 23:55 ` [RFC 09/11] tools: gpio: Add new hardware " Dipen Patel
2021-06-27 11:36   ` Linus Walleij
2021-07-30  3:17     ` Dipen Patel
2021-07-31  6:16       ` Kent Gibson
2021-08-11  9:11         ` Linus Walleij
2021-06-25 23:55 ` [RFC 10/11] hte: Add tegra GPIO HTE test driver Dipen Patel
2021-06-27 17:43   ` Randy Dunlap
2021-06-25 23:55 ` [RFC 11/11] MAINTAINERS: Added HTE Subsystem Dipen Patel
2021-06-27 13:07 ` [RFC 00/11] Intro to Hardware timestamping engine Andy Shevchenko
2021-06-27 14:40   ` Linus Walleij
2021-06-28 12:02     ` Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210701142433.GC34285@sol \
    --to=warthog618@gmail.com \
    --cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dipenp@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --subject='Re: [RFC 08/11] gpiolib: cdev: Add hardware timestamp clock type' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).