LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org
Cc: sudeep.holla@arm.com, james.quinlan@broadcom.com,
	Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
	etienne.carriere@linaro.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
	souvik.chakravarty@arm.com, cristian.marussi@arm.com,
	igor.skalkin@opensynergy.com, peter.hilber@opensynergy.com,
	alex.bennee@linaro.org, jean-philippe@linaro.org,
	mikhail.golubev@opensynergy.com, anton.yakovlev@opensynergy.com,
	Vasyl.Vavrychuk@opensynergy.com,
	Andriy.Tryshnivskyy@opensynergy.com
Subject: [PATCH v6 06/17] firmware: arm_scmi: Introduce monotonically increasing tokens
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 15:18:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210712141833.6628-7-cristian.marussi@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210712141833.6628-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com>

Tokens are sequence numbers embedded in the each SCMI message header: they
are used to correlate commands with responses (and delayed responses), but
their usage and policy of selection is entirely up to the caller (usually
the OSPM agent), while they are completely opaque to the callee (SCMI
server platform) which merely copies them back from the command into the
response message header.
This also means that the platform does not, can not and should not enforce
any kind of policy on received messages depending on the contained sequence
number: platform can perfectly handle concurrent requests carrying the same
identifiying token if that should happen.

Moreover the platform is not required to produce in-order responses to
agent requests, the only constraint in these regards is that in case of
an asynchronous message the delayed response must be sent after the
immediate response for the synchronous part of the command transaction.

Currenly the SCMI stack of the OSPM agent selects a token for the egressing
commands picking the lowest possible number which is not already in use by
an existing in-flight transaction, which means, in other words, that we
immediately reuse any token after its transaction has completed or it has
timed out: this policy indeed does simplify management and lookup of tokens
and associated xfers.

Under the above assumptions and constraints, since there is really no state
shared between the agent and the platform to let the platform know when a
token and its associated message has timed out, the current policy of early
reuse of tokens can easily lead to the situation in which a spurious or
late received response (or delayed_response), related to an old stale and
timed out transaction, can be wrongly associated to a newer valid in-flight
xfer that just happens to have reused the same token.

This misbehaviour on such ghost responses is more easily exposed on those
transports that naturally have an higher level of parallelism in processing
multiple concurrent in-flight messages.

This commit introduces a new policy of selection of tokens for the OSPM
agent: each new command transfer now gets the next available, monotonically
increasing token, until tokens are exhausted and the counter rolls over.

Such new policy mitigates the above issues with ghost responses since the
tokens are now reused as late as possible (when they roll back ideally)
and so it is much easier to identify such ghost responses to stale timed
out transactions: this also helps in simplifying the specific transports
implementation since stale transport messages can be easily identified
and discarded early on in the rx path without the need to cross check
their actual state with the core transport layer.
This mitigation is even more effective when, as is usually the case, the
maximum number of pending messages is capped by the platform to a much
lower number than the whole possible range of tokens values (2^10).

This internal policy change in the core SCMI transport layer is fully
transparent to the specific transports so it has not and should not have
any impact on the transports implementation.

Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
---
v4 --> V5
- removed empirical profiling info from commit msg
- do NOT use monotonic tokens and pending HT for notifications (not needed)
- release xfer_lock later in scmi_xfer_get
---
 drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h |  25 +++
 drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 260 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 2 files changed, 249 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h
index 6bb734e0e3ac..2233d0a188fc 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h
@@ -14,7 +14,10 @@
 #include <linux/device.h>
 #include <linux/errno.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/hashtable.h>
+#include <linux/list.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/refcount.h>
 #include <linux/scmi_protocol.h>
 #include <linux/types.h>
 
@@ -138,6 +141,10 @@ struct scmi_msg {
  *	buffer for the rx path as we use for the tx path.
  * @done: command message transmit completion event
  * @async_done: pointer to delayed response message received event completion
+ * @users: A refcount to track the active users for this xfer
+ * @pending: True for xfers added to @pending_xfers hashtable
+ * @node: An hlist_node reference used to store this xfer, alternatively, on
+ *	  the free list @free_xfers or in the @pending_xfers hashtable
  */
 struct scmi_xfer {
 	int transfer_id;
@@ -146,8 +153,26 @@ struct scmi_xfer {
 	struct scmi_msg rx;
 	struct completion done;
 	struct completion *async_done;
+	refcount_t users;
+	bool pending;
+	struct hlist_node node;
 };
 
+/*
+ * An helper macro to lookup an xfer from the @pending_xfers hashtable
+ * using the message sequence number token as a key.
+ */
+#define XFER_FIND(__ht, __k)					\
+({								\
+	typeof(__k) k_ = __k;					\
+	struct scmi_xfer *xfer_ = NULL;				\
+								\
+	hash_for_each_possible((__ht), xfer_, node, k_)		\
+		if (xfer_->hdr.seq == k_)			\
+			break;					\
+	xfer_;							\
+})
+
 struct scmi_xfer_ops;
 
 /**
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
index 4c77ee13b1ad..245ede223302 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
 #include <linux/io.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/ktime.h>
+#include <linux/hashtable.h>
 #include <linux/list.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/of_address.h>
@@ -65,19 +66,29 @@ struct scmi_requested_dev {
 	struct list_head node;
 };
 
+#define SCMI_PENDING_XFERS_HT_ORDER_SZ	9
+
 /**
  * struct scmi_xfers_info - Structure to manage transfer information
  *
- * @xfer_block: Preallocated Message array
  * @xfer_alloc_table: Bitmap table for allocated messages.
  *	Index of this bitmap table is also used for message
  *	sequence identifier.
  * @xfer_lock: Protection for message allocation
+ * @last_token: A counter to use as base to generate for monotonically
+ *		increasing tokens.
+ * @free_xfers: A free list for available to use xfers. It is initialized with
+ *		a number of xfers equal to the maximum allowed in-flight
+ *		messages.
+ * @pending_xfers: An hashtable, indexed by msg_hdr.seq, used to keep all the
+ *		   currently in-flight messages.
  */
 struct scmi_xfers_info {
-	struct scmi_xfer *xfer_block;
 	unsigned long *xfer_alloc_table;
 	spinlock_t xfer_lock;
+	atomic_t last_token;
+	struct hlist_head free_xfers;
+	DECLARE_HASHTABLE(pending_xfers, SCMI_PENDING_XFERS_HT_ORDER_SZ);
 };
 
 /**
@@ -190,45 +201,177 @@ void *scmi_notification_instance_data_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle)
 	return info->notify_priv;
 }
 
+/**
+ * scmi_xfer_token_set  - Reserve and set new token for the xfer at hand
+ *
+ * @minfo: Pointer to Tx/Rx Message management info based on channel type
+ * @xfer: The xfer to act upon
+ *
+ * Pick the next unused monotonically increasing token and set it into
+ * xfer->hdr.seq: picking a monotonically increasing value avoids immediate
+ * reuse of freshly completed or timed-out xfers, thus mitigating the risk
+ * of incorrect association of a late and expired xfer with a live in-flight
+ * transaction, both happening to re-use the same token identifier.
+ *
+ * Since platform is NOT required to answer our request in-order we should
+ * account for a few rare but possible scenarios:
+ *
+ *  - exactly 'next_token' may be NOT available so pick xfer_id >= next_token
+ *    using find_next_zero_bit() starting from candidate next_token bit
+ *
+ *  - all tokens ahead upto (MSG_TOKEN_ID_MASK - 1) are used in-flight but we
+ *    are plenty of free tokens at start, so try a second pass using
+ *    find_next_zero_bit() and starting from 0.
+ *
+ *  X = used in-flight
+ *
+ * Normal
+ * ------
+ *
+ *		|- xfer_id picked
+ *   -----------+----------------------------------------------------------
+ *   | | |X|X|X| | | | | | ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...|X|X|
+ *   ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+ *		^
+ *		|- next_token
+ *
+ * Out-of-order pending at start
+ * -----------------------------
+ *
+ *	  |- xfer_id picked, last_token fixed
+ *   -----+----------------------------------------------------------------
+ *   |X|X| | | | |X|X| ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...|X| |
+ *   ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+ *    ^
+ *    |- next_token
+ *
+ *
+ * Out-of-order pending at end
+ * ---------------------------
+ *
+ *	  |- xfer_id picked, last_token fixed
+ *   -----+----------------------------------------------------------------
+ *   |X|X| | | | |X|X| ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... |X|X|X||X|X|
+ *   ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+ *								^
+ *								|- next_token
+ *
+ * Context: Assumes to be called with @xfer_lock already acquired.
+ *
+ * Return: 0 on Success or error
+ */
+static int scmi_xfer_token_set(struct scmi_xfers_info *minfo,
+			       struct scmi_xfer *xfer)
+{
+	unsigned long xfer_id, next_token;
+
+	/* Pick a candidate monotonic token in range [0, MSG_TOKEN_MAX - 1] */
+	next_token = (atomic_inc_return(&minfo->last_token) &
+		      (MSG_TOKEN_MAX - 1));
+
+	/* Pick the next available xfer_id >= next_token */
+	xfer_id = find_next_zero_bit(minfo->xfer_alloc_table,
+				     MSG_TOKEN_MAX, next_token);
+	if (xfer_id == MSG_TOKEN_MAX) {
+		/*
+		 * After heavily out-of-order responses, there are no free
+		 * tokens ahead, but only at start of xfer_alloc_table so
+		 * try again from the beginning.
+		 */
+		xfer_id = find_next_zero_bit(minfo->xfer_alloc_table,
+					     MSG_TOKEN_MAX, 0);
+		/*
+		 * Something is wrong if we got here since there can be a
+		 * maximum number of (MSG_TOKEN_MAX - 1) in-flight messages
+		 * but we have not found any free token [0, MSG_TOKEN_MAX - 1].
+		 */
+		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(xfer_id == MSG_TOKEN_MAX))
+			return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+
+	/* Update +/- last_token accordingly if we skipped some hole */
+	if (xfer_id != next_token)
+		atomic_add((int)(xfer_id - next_token), &minfo->last_token);
+
+	/* Set in-flight */
+	set_bit(xfer_id, minfo->xfer_alloc_table);
+	xfer->hdr.seq = (u16)xfer_id;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/**
+ * scmi_xfer_token_clear  - Release the token
+ *
+ * @minfo: Pointer to Tx/Rx Message management info based on channel type
+ * @xfer: The xfer to act upon
+ */
+static inline void scmi_xfer_token_clear(struct scmi_xfers_info *minfo,
+					 struct scmi_xfer *xfer)
+{
+	clear_bit(xfer->hdr.seq, minfo->xfer_alloc_table);
+}
+
 /**
  * scmi_xfer_get() - Allocate one message
  *
  * @handle: Pointer to SCMI entity handle
  * @minfo: Pointer to Tx/Rx Message management info based on channel type
+ * @set_pending: If true a monotonic token is picked and the xfer is added to
+ *		 the pending hash table.
  *
  * Helper function which is used by various message functions that are
  * exposed to clients of this driver for allocating a message traffic event.
  *
- * This function can sleep depending on pending requests already in the system
- * for the SCMI entity. Further, this also holds a spinlock to maintain
- * integrity of internal data structures.
+ * Picks an xfer from the free list @free_xfers (if any available) and, if
+ * required, sets a monotonically increasing token and stores the inflight xfer
+ * into the @pending_xfers hashtable for later retrieval.
+ *
+ * The successfully initialized xfer is refcounted.
+ *
+ * Context: Holds @xfer_lock while manipulating @xfer_alloc_table and
+ *	    @free_xfers.
  *
  * Return: 0 if all went fine, else corresponding error.
  */
 static struct scmi_xfer *scmi_xfer_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle,
-				       struct scmi_xfers_info *minfo)
+				       struct scmi_xfers_info *minfo,
+				       bool set_pending)
 {
-	u16 xfer_id;
+	int ret;
+	unsigned long flags;
 	struct scmi_xfer *xfer;
-	unsigned long flags, bit_pos;
-	struct scmi_info *info = handle_to_scmi_info(handle);
 
-	/* Keep the locked section as small as possible */
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&minfo->xfer_lock, flags);
-	bit_pos = find_first_zero_bit(minfo->xfer_alloc_table,
-				      info->desc->max_msg);
-	if (bit_pos == info->desc->max_msg) {
+	if (hlist_empty(&minfo->free_xfers)) {
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&minfo->xfer_lock, flags);
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 	}
-	set_bit(bit_pos, minfo->xfer_alloc_table);
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&minfo->xfer_lock, flags);
 
-	xfer_id = bit_pos;
+	/* grab an xfer from the free_list */
+	xfer = hlist_entry(minfo->free_xfers.first, struct scmi_xfer, node);
+	hlist_del_init(&xfer->node);
+
+	if (set_pending) {
+		/* Pick and set monotonic token */
+		ret = scmi_xfer_token_set(minfo, xfer);
+		if (!ret) {
+			hash_add(minfo->pending_xfers, &xfer->node,
+				 xfer->hdr.seq);
+			xfer->pending = true;
+		} else {
+			dev_err(handle->dev,
+				"Failed to get monotonic token %d\n", ret);
+			hlist_add_head(&xfer->node, &minfo->free_xfers);
+			xfer = ERR_PTR(ret);
+		}
+	}
 
-	xfer = &minfo->xfer_block[xfer_id];
-	xfer->hdr.seq = xfer_id;
-	xfer->transfer_id = atomic_inc_return(&transfer_last_id);
+	if (!IS_ERR(xfer)) {
+		refcount_set(&xfer->users, 1);
+		xfer->transfer_id = atomic_inc_return(&transfer_last_id);
+	}
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&minfo->xfer_lock, flags);
 
 	return xfer;
 }
@@ -239,6 +382,9 @@ static struct scmi_xfer *scmi_xfer_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle,
  * @minfo: Pointer to Tx/Rx Message management info based on channel type
  * @xfer: message that was reserved by scmi_xfer_get
  *
+ * After refcount check, possibly release an xfer, clearing the token slot,
+ * removing xfer from @pending_xfers and putting it back into free_xfers.
+ *
  * This holds a spinlock to maintain integrity of internal data structures.
  */
 static void
@@ -246,16 +392,44 @@ __scmi_xfer_put(struct scmi_xfers_info *minfo, struct scmi_xfer *xfer)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 
-	/*
-	 * Keep the locked section as small as possible
-	 * NOTE: we might escape with smp_mb and no lock here..
-	 * but just be conservative and symmetric.
-	 */
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&minfo->xfer_lock, flags);
-	clear_bit(xfer->hdr.seq, minfo->xfer_alloc_table);
+	if (refcount_dec_and_test(&xfer->users)) {
+		if (xfer->pending) {
+			scmi_xfer_token_clear(minfo, xfer);
+			hash_del(&xfer->node);
+			xfer->pending = false;
+		}
+		hlist_add_head(&xfer->node, &minfo->free_xfers);
+	}
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&minfo->xfer_lock, flags);
 }
 
+/**
+ * scmi_xfer_lookup_unlocked  -  Helper to lookup an xfer_id
+ *
+ * @minfo: Pointer to Tx/Rx Message management info based on channel type
+ * @xfer_id: Token ID to lookup in @pending_xfers
+ *
+ * Refcounting is untouched.
+ *
+ * Context: Assumes to be called with @xfer_lock already acquired.
+ *
+ * Return: A valid xfer on Success or error otherwise
+ */
+static struct scmi_xfer *
+scmi_xfer_lookup_unlocked(struct scmi_xfers_info *minfo, u16 xfer_id)
+{
+	struct scmi_xfer *xfer = NULL;
+
+	if (xfer_id >= MSG_TOKEN_MAX)
+		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+
+	if (test_bit(xfer_id, minfo->xfer_alloc_table))
+		xfer = XFER_FIND(minfo->pending_xfers, xfer_id);
+
+	return xfer ?: ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+}
+
 static void scmi_handle_notification(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, u32 msg_hdr)
 {
 	struct scmi_xfer *xfer;
@@ -265,7 +439,7 @@ static void scmi_handle_notification(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, u32 msg_hdr)
 	ktime_t ts;
 
 	ts = ktime_get_boottime();
-	xfer = scmi_xfer_get(cinfo->handle, minfo);
+	xfer = scmi_xfer_get(cinfo->handle, minfo, false);
 	if (IS_ERR(xfer)) {
 		dev_err(dev, "failed to get free message slot (%ld)\n",
 			PTR_ERR(xfer));
@@ -291,19 +465,22 @@ static void scmi_handle_notification(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, u32 msg_hdr)
 static void scmi_handle_response(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo,
 				 u16 xfer_id, u8 msg_type)
 {
+	unsigned long flags;
 	struct scmi_xfer *xfer;
 	struct device *dev = cinfo->dev;
 	struct scmi_info *info = handle_to_scmi_info(cinfo->handle);
 	struct scmi_xfers_info *minfo = &info->tx_minfo;
 
 	/* Are we even expecting this? */
-	if (!test_bit(xfer_id, minfo->xfer_alloc_table)) {
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&minfo->xfer_lock, flags);
+	xfer = scmi_xfer_lookup_unlocked(minfo, xfer_id);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&minfo->xfer_lock, flags);
+	if (IS_ERR(xfer)) {
 		dev_err(dev, "message for %d is not expected!\n", xfer_id);
 		info->desc->ops->clear_channel(cinfo);
 		return;
 	}
 
-	xfer = &minfo->xfer_block[xfer_id];
 	/*
 	 * Even if a response was indeed expected on this slot at this point,
 	 * a buggy platform could wrongly reply feeding us an unexpected
@@ -540,7 +717,7 @@ static int xfer_get_init(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
 	    tx_size > info->desc->max_msg_size)
 		return -ERANGE;
 
-	xfer = scmi_xfer_get(pi->handle, minfo);
+	xfer = scmi_xfer_get(pi->handle, minfo, true);
 	if (IS_ERR(xfer)) {
 		ret = PTR_ERR(xfer);
 		dev_err(dev, "failed to get free message slot(%d)\n", ret);
@@ -1017,18 +1194,25 @@ static int __scmi_xfer_info_init(struct scmi_info *sinfo,
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	info->xfer_block = devm_kcalloc(dev, desc->max_msg,
-					sizeof(*info->xfer_block), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!info->xfer_block)
-		return -ENOMEM;
+	hash_init(info->pending_xfers);
 
-	info->xfer_alloc_table = devm_kcalloc(dev, BITS_TO_LONGS(desc->max_msg),
+	/* Allocate a bitmask sized to hold MSG_TOKEN_MAX tokens */
+	info->xfer_alloc_table = devm_kcalloc(dev, BITS_TO_LONGS(MSG_TOKEN_MAX),
 					      sizeof(long), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!info->xfer_alloc_table)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	/* Pre-initialize the buffer pointer to pre-allocated buffers */
-	for (i = 0, xfer = info->xfer_block; i < desc->max_msg; i++, xfer++) {
+	/*
+	 * Preallocate a number of xfers equal to max inflight messages,
+	 * pre-initialize the buffer pointer to pre-allocated buffers and
+	 * attach all of them to the free list
+	 */
+	INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&info->free_xfers);
+	for (i = 0; i < desc->max_msg; i++) {
+		xfer = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*xfer), GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!xfer)
+			return -ENOMEM;
+
 		xfer->rx.buf = devm_kcalloc(dev, sizeof(u8), desc->max_msg_size,
 					    GFP_KERNEL);
 		if (!xfer->rx.buf)
@@ -1036,8 +1220,12 @@ static int __scmi_xfer_info_init(struct scmi_info *sinfo,
 
 		xfer->tx.buf = xfer->rx.buf;
 		init_completion(&xfer->done);
+
+		/* Add initialized xfer to the free list */
+		hlist_add_head(&xfer->node, &info->free_xfers);
 	}
 
+	atomic_set(&info->last_token, -1);
 	spin_lock_init(&info->xfer_lock);
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.17.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-12 14:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-12 14:18 [PATCH v6 00/17] Introduce SCMI transport based on VirtIO Cristian Marussi
2021-07-12 14:18 ` [PATCH v6 01/17] firmware: arm_scmi: Avoid padding in sensor message structure Cristian Marussi
2021-07-12 14:18 ` [PATCH v6 02/17] firmware: arm_scmi: Fix max pending messages boundary check Cristian Marussi
2021-07-14 16:46   ` Sudeep Holla
2021-07-12 14:18 ` [PATCH v6 03/17] firmware: arm_scmi: Add support for type handling in common functions Cristian Marussi
2021-07-12 14:18 ` [PATCH v6 04/17] firmware: arm_scmi: Remove scmi_dump_header_dbg() helper Cristian Marussi
2021-07-12 14:18 ` [PATCH v6 05/17] firmware: arm_scmi: Add transport optional init/exit support Cristian Marussi
2021-07-28 11:40   ` Sudeep Holla
2021-07-28 12:28     ` Cristian Marussi
2021-07-12 14:18 ` Cristian Marussi [this message]
2021-07-28 14:17   ` [PATCH v6 06/17] firmware: arm_scmi: Introduce monotonically increasing tokens Sudeep Holla
2021-07-28 16:54     ` Cristian Marussi
2021-08-02 10:24       ` Sudeep Holla
2021-08-03 12:52         ` Cristian Marussi
2021-07-12 14:18 ` [PATCH v6 07/17] firmware: arm_scmi: Handle concurrent and out-of-order messages Cristian Marussi
2021-07-15 16:36   ` Peter Hilber
2021-07-19  9:14     ` Cristian Marussi
2021-07-22  8:32       ` Peter Hilber
2021-07-28  8:31         ` Cristian Marussi
2021-08-02 10:10   ` Sudeep Holla
2021-08-02 10:27     ` Cristian Marussi
2021-07-12 14:18 ` [PATCH v6 08/17] firmware: arm_scmi: Add priv parameter to scmi_rx_callback Cristian Marussi
2021-07-28 14:26   ` Sudeep Holla
2021-07-28 17:25     ` Cristian Marussi
2021-07-12 14:18 ` [PATCH v6 09/17] firmware: arm_scmi: Make .clear_channel optional Cristian Marussi
2021-07-12 14:18 ` [PATCH v6 10/17] firmware: arm_scmi: Make polling mode optional Cristian Marussi
2021-07-15 16:36   ` Peter Hilber
2021-07-19  9:15     ` Cristian Marussi
2021-07-28 14:34   ` Sudeep Holla
2021-07-28 17:41     ` Cristian Marussi
2021-07-12 14:18 ` [PATCH v6 11/17] firmware: arm_scmi: Make SCMI transports configurable Cristian Marussi
2021-07-28 14:50   ` Sudeep Holla
2021-07-29 16:18     ` Cristian Marussi
2021-07-12 14:18 ` [PATCH v6 12/17] firmware: arm_scmi: Make shmem support optional for transports Cristian Marussi
2021-07-12 14:18 ` [PATCH v6 13/17] firmware: arm_scmi: Add method to override max message number Cristian Marussi
2021-07-12 14:18 ` [PATCH v6 14/17] firmware: arm_scmi: Add message passing abstractions for transports Cristian Marussi
2021-07-15 16:36   ` Peter Hilber
2021-07-19  9:16     ` Cristian Marussi
2021-07-12 14:18 ` [PATCH v6 15/17] firmware: arm_scmi: Add optional link_supplier() transport op Cristian Marussi
2021-07-28 15:36   ` Sudeep Holla
2021-07-29 16:19     ` Cristian Marussi
2021-07-12 14:18 ` [PATCH v6 16/17] dt-bindings: arm: Add virtio transport for SCMI Cristian Marussi
2021-07-12 14:18 ` [PATCH v6 17/17] firmware: arm_scmi: Add virtio transport Cristian Marussi
2021-07-15 16:35 ` [PATCH v6 00/17] Introduce SCMI transport based on VirtIO Peter Hilber
2021-07-19 11:36   ` Cristian Marussi
2021-07-22  8:30     ` Peter Hilber
2021-08-11  9:31 ` Floris Westermann
2021-08-11 15:26   ` Cristian Marussi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210712141833.6628-7-cristian.marussi@arm.com \
    --to=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
    --cc=Andriy.Tryshnivskyy@opensynergy.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com \
    --cc=Vasyl.Vavrychuk@opensynergy.com \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=anton.yakovlev@opensynergy.com \
    --cc=etienne.carriere@linaro.org \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=igor.skalkin@opensynergy.com \
    --cc=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mikhail.golubev@opensynergy.com \
    --cc=peter.hilber@opensynergy.com \
    --cc=souvik.chakravarty@arm.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v6 06/17] firmware: arm_scmi: Introduce monotonically increasing tokens' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).