LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: jaegeuk@kernel.org
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chao Yu <chao.yu@linux.dev>,
	Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3] f2fs: fix to force keeping write barrier for strict fsync mode
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 09:03:29 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210720010329.3975-1-chao@kernel.org> (raw)

[1] https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg15126.html

As [1] reported, if lower device doesn't support write barrier, in below
case:

- write page #0; persist
- overwrite page #0
- fsync
 - write data page #0 OPU into device's cache
 - write inode page into device's cache
 - issue flush

If SPO is triggered during flush command, inode page can be persisted
before data page #0, so that after recovery, inode page can be recovered
with new physical block address of data page #0, however there may
contains dummy data in new physical block address.

Then what user will see is: after overwrite & fsync + SPO, old data in
file was corrupted, if any user do care about such case, we can suggest
user to use STRICT fsync mode, in this mode, we will force to use atomic
write sematics to keep write order in between data/node and last node,
so that it avoids potential data corruption during fsync().

Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
---
 fs/f2fs/file.c | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
index 6afd4562335f..00b45876eaa1 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
@@ -301,6 +301,18 @@ static int f2fs_do_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end,
 				f2fs_exist_written_data(sbi, ino, UPDATE_INO))
 			goto flush_out;
 		goto out;
+	} else {
+		/*
+		 * for OPU case, during fsync(), node can be persisted before
+		 * data when lower device doesn't support write barrier, result
+		 * in data corruption after SPO.
+		 * So for strict fsync mode, force to use atomic write sematics
+		 * to keep write order in between data/node and last node to
+		 * avoid potential data corruption.
+		 */
+		if (F2FS_OPTION(sbi).fsync_mode ==
+				FSYNC_MODE_STRICT && !atomic)
+			atomic = true;
 	}
 go_write:
 	/*
-- 
2.22.1


             reply	other threads:[~2021-07-20  1:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-20  1:03 Chao Yu [this message]
2021-07-20  1:15 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-07-20  1:19   ` Chao Yu
2021-07-29  1:41     ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2021-07-30 22:19       ` Jaegeuk Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210720010329.3975-1-chao@kernel.org \
    --to=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=chao.yu@linux.dev \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v3] f2fs: fix to force keeping write barrier for strict fsync mode' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).