LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rafael@kernel.org,
andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] Check for endpoints in fwnode->secondary more sensibly
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 21:19:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210722201929.3585671-1-djrscally@gmail.com> (raw)
Hello all
A while ago I patched fwnode_graph_get_endpoint_by_id() to check for endpoints
against fwnode->secondary if none was found against the primary. It's actually
better to do this in fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint() instead, since that
function is called by fwnode_graph_get_endpoint_by_id() and also directly called
in a bunch of other places (primarily sensor drivers checking that they have
endpoints connected during probe). This small series just adds the equivalent
functionality to fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint() and reverts the earlier
commit.
Thanks
Dan
Daniel Scally (2):
device property: Check fwnode->secondary in
fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint()
Revert "media: device property: Call fwnode_graph_get_endpoint_by_id()
for fwnode->secondary"
drivers/base/property.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--
2.25.1
next reply other threads:[~2021-07-22 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-22 20:19 Daniel Scally [this message]
2021-07-22 20:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] device property: Check fwnode->secondary in fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint() Daniel Scally
2021-07-23 12:32 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-07-23 13:04 ` Daniel Scally
2021-07-30 11:34 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-07-31 21:36 ` Daniel Scally
2021-07-22 20:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] Revert "media: device property: Call fwnode_graph_get_endpoint_by_id() for fwnode->secondary" Daniel Scally
2021-07-23 12:33 ` [PATCH 0/2] Check for endpoints in fwnode->secondary more sensibly Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210722201929.3585671-1-djrscally@gmail.com \
--to=djrscally@gmail.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--subject='Re: [PATCH 0/2] Check for endpoints in fwnode->secondary more sensibly' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).