LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rafael@kernel.org,
	andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
	laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] Check for endpoints in fwnode->secondary more sensibly
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 21:19:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210722201929.3585671-1-djrscally@gmail.com> (raw)

Hello all

A while ago I patched fwnode_graph_get_endpoint_by_id() to check for endpoints
against fwnode->secondary if none was found against the primary. It's actually
better to do this in fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint() instead, since that
function is called by fwnode_graph_get_endpoint_by_id() and also directly called
in a bunch of other places (primarily sensor drivers checking that they have
endpoints connected during probe). This small series just adds the equivalent
functionality to fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint() and reverts the earlier
commit.

Thanks
Dan

Daniel Scally (2):
  device property: Check fwnode->secondary in
    fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint()
  Revert "media: device property: Call fwnode_graph_get_endpoint_by_id()
    for fwnode->secondary"

 drivers/base/property.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

-- 
2.25.1


             reply	other threads:[~2021-07-22 20:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-22 20:19 Daniel Scally [this message]
2021-07-22 20:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] device property: Check fwnode->secondary in fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint() Daniel Scally
2021-07-23 12:32   ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-07-23 13:04     ` Daniel Scally
2021-07-30 11:34       ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-07-31 21:36         ` Daniel Scally
2021-07-22 20:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] Revert "media: device property: Call fwnode_graph_get_endpoint_by_id() for fwnode->secondary" Daniel Scally
2021-07-23 12:33 ` [PATCH 0/2] Check for endpoints in fwnode->secondary more sensibly Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210722201929.3585671-1-djrscally@gmail.com \
    --to=djrscally@gmail.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 0/2] Check for endpoints in fwnode->secondary more sensibly' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).