LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-team@android.com, Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] sched/deadline: Fix sched_getattr() for DL tasks
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 18:52:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210729175214.294142-1-qperret@google.com> (raw)
In its current state, sched_getattr() can report incorrect sched_flags
if called on a deadline task.
Firstly, if the reset_on_fork flag is set on a deadline task using
sched_setattr() with SCHED_FLAG_RESET_ON_FORK | SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_PARAMS,
p->sched_reset_on_fork will be set but __setscheduler() will bail out
early without updating the dl_se->flags. Consequently, if sched_getattr
is then called on the same task, __getparam_dl() will override
kattr.sched_flags with the now out-of-date copy in dl_se->flags and
report a stale reset_on_fork value to userspace.
And secondly, sched_getattr() currently reports SCHED_FLAG_SUGOV as set
if called on a schedutil worker, despite this flag being a kernel-only
value that is not exposed in UAPI headers.
To fix both of these problems, make sure to only copy the flags that are
relevant to sched_deadline to dl_se->flags, and filter them out when
reporting them back to userspace.
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
---
v1 can be found here:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210727101103.2729607-1-qperret@google.com/
Changes since v1:
- squashed the two patches together
- moved the SCHED_FLAG_SUGOV filtering to __getparam_dl()
---
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 7 ++++---
kernel/sched/sched.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index aaacd6cfd42f..358a8a2acfc2 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -2741,7 +2741,7 @@ void __setparam_dl(struct task_struct *p, const struct sched_attr *attr)
dl_se->dl_runtime = attr->sched_runtime;
dl_se->dl_deadline = attr->sched_deadline;
dl_se->dl_period = attr->sched_period ?: dl_se->dl_deadline;
- dl_se->flags = attr->sched_flags;
+ dl_se->flags = attr->sched_flags & SCHED_DL_FLAGS;
dl_se->dl_bw = to_ratio(dl_se->dl_period, dl_se->dl_runtime);
dl_se->dl_density = to_ratio(dl_se->dl_deadline, dl_se->dl_runtime);
}
@@ -2754,7 +2754,8 @@ void __getparam_dl(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_attr *attr)
attr->sched_runtime = dl_se->dl_runtime;
attr->sched_deadline = dl_se->dl_deadline;
attr->sched_period = dl_se->dl_period;
- attr->sched_flags = dl_se->flags;
+ attr->sched_flags &= ~SCHED_DL_FLAGS;
+ attr->sched_flags |= dl_se->flags & ~SCHED_FLAG_SUGOV;
}
/*
@@ -2851,7 +2852,7 @@ bool dl_param_changed(struct task_struct *p, const struct sched_attr *attr)
if (dl_se->dl_runtime != attr->sched_runtime ||
dl_se->dl_deadline != attr->sched_deadline ||
dl_se->dl_period != attr->sched_period ||
- dl_se->flags != attr->sched_flags)
+ dl_se->flags != (attr->sched_flags & SCHED_DL_FLAGS))
return true;
return false;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 14a41a243f7b..ad3aee63db26 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -227,6 +227,8 @@ static inline void update_avg(u64 *avg, u64 sample)
*/
#define SCHED_FLAG_SUGOV 0x10000000
+#define SCHED_DL_FLAGS (SCHED_FLAG_RECLAIM | SCHED_FLAG_DL_OVERRUN | SCHED_FLAG_SUGOV)
+
static inline bool dl_entity_is_special(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_SCHEDUTIL
--
2.32.0.554.ge1b32706d8-goog
next reply other threads:[~2021-07-29 17:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-29 17:52 Quentin Perret [this message]
2021-07-30 9:22 ` Juri Lelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210729175214.294142-1-qperret@google.com \
--to=qperret@google.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--subject='Re: [PATCH v2] sched/deadline: Fix sched_getattr() for DL tasks' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).