LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Veronika kabatova <vkabatov@redhat.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] ACPI: Add memory semantics to acpi_os_map_memory()
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2021 17:46:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210802164622.GJ18685@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210802152359.12623-4-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>

On Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 04:23:59PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> The memory attributes attached to memory regions depend on architecture
> specific mappings.
> 
> For some memory regions, the attributes specified by firmware (eg
> uncached) are not sufficient to determine how a memory region should be
> mapped by an OS (for instance a region that is define as uncached in
> firmware can be mapped as Normal or Device memory on arm64) and
> therefore the OS must be given control on how to map the region to match
> the expected mapping behaviour (eg if a mapping is requested with memory
> semantics, it must allow unaligned accesses).
> 
> Rework acpi_os_map_memory() and acpi_os_ioremap() back-end to split
> them into two separate code paths:
> 
> acpi_os_memmap() -> memory semantics
> acpi_os_ioremap() -> MMIO semantics
> 
> The split allows the architectural implementation back-ends to detect
> the default memory attributes required by the mapping in question
> (ie the mapping API defines the semantics memory vs MMIO) and map the
> memory accordingly.
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/31ffe8fc-f5ee-2858-26c5-0fd8bdd68702@arm.com
> Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
> Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>

For the arm64 bits:

Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

I presume this will get merged via the ACPI tree?

-- 
Catalin

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-02 16:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-26 10:00 [PATCH] " Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-07-26 15:55 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-07-27 10:06   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-07-27 10:09     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-07-27 16:38       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-07-27  4:21 ` Hanjun Guo
2021-08-02 15:23 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] ACPI: Fix acpi_os_map_memory() memory semantics Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-08-02 15:37   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-08-23 10:35   ` [PATCH v3] ACPI: Add memory semantics to acpi_os_map_memory() Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-08-23 10:46   ` [PATCH RESEND " Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-08-23 12:30     ` Catalin Marinas
2021-08-25 17:46       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-08-02 15:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] ACPI: osl: Add __force attribute in acpi_os_map_iomem() cast Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-08-10 16:45   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-11 10:40     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-08-11 14:01       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-08-11 14:08       ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-11 14:55         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-08-16  9:58           ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-08-16 10:21             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-08-16 10:59               ` Robin Murphy
2021-08-16 13:57               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-08-02 15:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] ACPI: osl: Reorder acpi_os_map_iomem() __ref annotation Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-08-02 15:23 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] ACPI: Add memory semantics to acpi_os_map_memory() Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-08-02 16:46   ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2021-08-03  9:16     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-08-05 19:02       ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210802164622.GJ18685@arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=vkabatov@redhat.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] ACPI: Add memory semantics to acpi_os_map_memory()' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).