LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anirudh Rayabharam <mail@anirudhrb.com>
To: Valentina Manea <valentina.manea.m@gmail.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	Anirudh Rayabharam <mail@anirudhrb.com>,
	syzbot+74d6ef051d3d2eacf428@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] usbip: give back URBs for unsent unlink requests during cleanup
Date: Fri,  6 Aug 2021 23:43:35 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210806181335.2078-1-mail@anirudhrb.com> (raw)

In vhci_device_unlink_cleanup(), the URBs for unsent unlink requests are
not given back. This sometimes causes usb_kill_urb to wait indefinitely
for that urb to be given back. syzbot has reported a hung task issue [1]
for this.

To fix this, give back the urbs corresponding to unsent unlink requests
(unlink_tx list) similar to how urbs corresponding to unanswered unlink
requests (unlink_rx list) are given back. Since the code is almost the
same, extract it into a new function and call it for both unlink_rx and
unlink_tx lists.

[1]: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=08f12df95ae7da69814e64eb5515d5a85ed06b76

Reported-by: syzbot+74d6ef051d3d2eacf428@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Tested-by: syzbot+74d6ef051d3d2eacf428@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Anirudh Rayabharam <mail@anirudhrb.com>
---

Changes in v2:
Use WARN_ON() instead of BUG() when unlink_list is neither unlink_tx nor
unlink_rx.

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210806164015.25263-1-mail@anirudhrb.com/

---
 drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_hcd.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_hcd.c b/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_hcd.c
index 4ba6bcdaa8e9..67e638f4c455 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_hcd.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_hcd.c
@@ -945,7 +945,8 @@ static int vhci_urb_dequeue(struct usb_hcd *hcd, struct urb *urb, int status)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void vhci_device_unlink_cleanup(struct vhci_device *vdev)
+static void __vhci_cleanup_unlink_list(struct vhci_device *vdev,
+		struct list_head *unlink_list)
 {
 	struct vhci_hcd *vhci_hcd = vdev_to_vhci_hcd(vdev);
 	struct usb_hcd *hcd = vhci_hcd_to_hcd(vhci_hcd);
@@ -953,23 +954,23 @@ static void vhci_device_unlink_cleanup(struct vhci_device *vdev)
 	struct vhci_unlink *unlink, *tmp;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
+	if (WARN(unlink_list != &vdev->unlink_tx
+				&& unlink_list != &vdev->unlink_rx,
+			"Invalid list passed to __vhci_cleanup_unlink_list\n"))
+		return;
+
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&vhci->lock, flags);
 	spin_lock(&vdev->priv_lock);
 
-	list_for_each_entry_safe(unlink, tmp, &vdev->unlink_tx, list) {
-		pr_info("unlink cleanup tx %lu\n", unlink->unlink_seqnum);
-		list_del(&unlink->list);
-		kfree(unlink);
-	}
-
-	while (!list_empty(&vdev->unlink_rx)) {
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(unlink, tmp, unlink_list, list) {
 		struct urb *urb;
 
-		unlink = list_first_entry(&vdev->unlink_rx, struct vhci_unlink,
-			list);
-
-		/* give back URB of unanswered unlink request */
-		pr_info("unlink cleanup rx %lu\n", unlink->unlink_seqnum);
+		if (unlink_list == &vdev->unlink_tx)
+			pr_info("unlink cleanup tx %lu\n",
+					unlink->unlink_seqnum);
+		else
+			pr_info("unlink cleanup rx %lu\n",
+					unlink->unlink_seqnum);
 
 		urb = pickup_urb_and_free_priv(vdev, unlink->unlink_seqnum);
 		if (!urb) {
@@ -1001,6 +1002,24 @@ static void vhci_device_unlink_cleanup(struct vhci_device *vdev)
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vhci->lock, flags);
 }
 
+static inline void vhci_cleanup_unlink_tx(struct vhci_device *vdev)
+{
+	__vhci_cleanup_unlink_list(vdev, &vdev->unlink_tx);
+}
+
+static inline void vhci_cleanup_unlink_rx(struct vhci_device *vdev)
+{
+	__vhci_cleanup_unlink_list(vdev, &vdev->unlink_rx);
+}
+
+static void vhci_device_unlink_cleanup(struct vhci_device *vdev)
+{
+	/* give back URBs of unsent unlink requests */
+	vhci_cleanup_unlink_tx(vdev);
+	/* give back URBs of unanswered unlink requests */
+	vhci_cleanup_unlink_rx(vdev);
+}
+
 /*
  * The important thing is that only one context begins cleanup.
  * This is why error handling and cleanup become simple.
-- 
2.26.2


             reply	other threads:[~2021-08-06 18:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-06 18:13 Anirudh Rayabharam [this message]
2021-08-10 23:25 ` Shuah Khan
2021-08-11 13:58   ` Anirudh Rayabharam
2021-08-11 21:51     ` Shuah Khan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210806181335.2078-1-mail@anirudhrb.com \
    --to=mail@anirudhrb.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=syzbot+74d6ef051d3d2eacf428@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=valentina.manea.m@gmail.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v2] usbip: give back URBs for unsent unlink requests during cleanup' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).