LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zeng Guang <guang.zeng@intel.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com>,
	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
	Jethro Beekman <jethro@fortanix.com>,
	Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Robert Hu <robert.hu@intel.com>, Gao Chao <chao.gao@intel.com>,
	Zeng Guang <guang.zeng@intel.com>,
	Robert Hoo <robert.hu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/6] KVM: VMX: Extend BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW macro to support 64-bit variation
Date: Mon,  9 Aug 2021 11:29:21 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210809032925.3548-3-guang.zeng@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210809032925.3548-1-guang.zeng@intel.com>

From: Robert Hoo <robert.hu@linux.intel.com>

The Tertiary VM-Exec Control, different from previous control fields, is 64
bit. So extend BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW() by adding a 'bit' parameter, to
support both 32 bit and 64 bit fields' auxiliary functions building.
Also, define the auxiliary functions for Tertiary control field here, using
the new BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW().

Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Hoo <robert.hu@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zeng Guang <guang.zeng@intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
index 3979a947933a..558f61208a6f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
@@ -413,31 +413,34 @@ static inline u8 vmx_get_rvi(void)
 	return vmcs_read16(GUEST_INTR_STATUS) & 0xff;
 }
 
-#define BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW(lname, uname)				    \
-static inline void lname##_controls_set(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, u32 val)	    \
-{									    \
-	if (vmx->loaded_vmcs->controls_shadow.lname != val) {		    \
-		vmcs_write32(uname, val);				    \
-		vmx->loaded_vmcs->controls_shadow.lname = val;		    \
-	}								    \
-}									    \
-static inline u32 lname##_controls_get(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)		    \
-{									    \
-	return vmx->loaded_vmcs->controls_shadow.lname;			    \
-}									    \
-static inline void lname##_controls_setbit(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, u32 val)   \
-{									    \
-	lname##_controls_set(vmx, lname##_controls_get(vmx) | val);	    \
-}									    \
-static inline void lname##_controls_clearbit(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, u32 val) \
-{									    \
-	lname##_controls_set(vmx, lname##_controls_get(vmx) & ~val);	    \
+#define BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW(lname, uname, bits)			\
+static inline								\
+void lname##_controls_set(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, u##bits val)		\
+{									\
+	if (vmx->loaded_vmcs->controls_shadow.lname != val) {		\
+		vmcs_write##bits(uname, val);				\
+		vmx->loaded_vmcs->controls_shadow.lname = val;		\
+	}								\
+}									\
+static inline u##bits lname##_controls_get(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)	\
+{									\
+	return vmx->loaded_vmcs->controls_shadow.lname;			\
+}									\
+static inline								\
+void lname##_controls_setbit(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, u##bits val)		\
+{									\
+	lname##_controls_set(vmx, lname##_controls_get(vmx) | val);	\
+}									\
+static inline								\
+void lname##_controls_clearbit(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, u##bits val)	\
+{									\
+	lname##_controls_set(vmx, lname##_controls_get(vmx) & ~val);	\
 }
-BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW(vm_entry, VM_ENTRY_CONTROLS)
-BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW(vm_exit, VM_EXIT_CONTROLS)
-BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW(pin, PIN_BASED_VM_EXEC_CONTROL)
-BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW(exec, CPU_BASED_VM_EXEC_CONTROL)
-BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW(secondary_exec, SECONDARY_VM_EXEC_CONTROL)
+BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW(vm_entry, VM_ENTRY_CONTROLS, 32)
+BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW(vm_exit, VM_EXIT_CONTROLS, 32)
+BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW(pin, PIN_BASED_VM_EXEC_CONTROL, 32)
+BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW(exec, CPU_BASED_VM_EXEC_CONTROL, 32)
+BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW(secondary_exec, SECONDARY_VM_EXEC_CONTROL, 32)
 
 static inline void vmx_register_cache_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-08-09  3:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-09  3:29 [PATCH v4 0/6] IPI virtualization support for VM Zeng Guang
2021-08-09  3:29 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] x86/feat_ctl: Add new VMX feature, Tertiary VM-Execution control Zeng Guang
2021-09-10 21:25   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-17 16:10     ` Zeng Guang
2021-08-09  3:29 ` Zeng Guang [this message]
2021-09-10 21:28   ` [PATCH v4 2/6] KVM: VMX: Extend BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW macro to support 64-bit variation Sean Christopherson
2021-09-17 16:13     ` Zeng Guang
2021-08-09  3:29 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] KVM: VMX: Detect Tertiary VM-Execution control when setup VMCS config Zeng Guang
2021-09-10 21:35   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-17 16:15     ` Zeng Guang
2021-08-09  3:29 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] KVM: VMX: dump_vmcs() reports tertiary_exec_control field as well Zeng Guang
2021-08-09  3:29 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] KVM: x86: Support interrupt dispatch in x2APIC mode with APIC-write VM exit Zeng Guang
2021-09-10 22:28   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-17 16:00     ` Zeng Guang
2021-08-09  3:29 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] KVM: VMX: enable IPI virtualization Zeng Guang
2021-09-10 23:43   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-10 23:55     ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-17 16:10       ` Zeng Guang
2021-10-14 18:56         ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-17 16:00     ` Zeng Guang
2021-08-20 13:19 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] IPI virtualization support for VM Zeng Guang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210809032925.3548-3-guang.zeng@intel.com \
    --to=guang.zeng@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=jethro@fortanix.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kim.phillips@amd.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=robert.hu@intel.com \
    --cc=robert.hu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] KVM: VMX: Extend BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW macro to support 64-bit variation' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).