LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: joro@8bytes.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com,
baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, john.garry@huawei.com,
dianders@chromium.org, rajatja@google.com,
chenxiang66@hisilicon.com,
Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 25/25] iommu: Allow enabling non-strict mode dynamically
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 13:49:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210809124931.GA1097@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <22b044263f69e2bfe404c4379a435005ea58b3e2.1628094601.git.robin.murphy@arm.com>
On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 06:15:53PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Allocating and enabling a flush queue is in fact something we can
> reasonably do while a DMA domain is active, without having to rebuild it
> from scratch. Thus we can allow a strict -> non-strict transition from
> sysfs without requiring to unbind the device's driver, which is of
> particular interest to users who want to make selective relaxations to
> critical devices like the one serving their root filesystem.
>
> Disabling and draining a queue also seems technically possible to
> achieve without rebuilding the whole domain, but would certainly be more
> involved. Furthermore there's not such a clear use-case for tightening
> up security *after* the device may already have done whatever it is that
> you don't trust it not to do, so we only consider the relaxation case.
>
> CC: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
>
> ---
>
> v3: Actually think about concurrency, rework most of the fq data
> accesses to be (hopefully) safe and comment it all
> ---
> drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
> drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
> drivers/iommu/iova.c | 9 ++++++---
> 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
I failed to break this, so hopefully you've caught everything now.
Only thing I wasn't sure of is why we still need the smp_wmb() in
init_iova_flush_queue(). Can we remove it now that we have one before
assigning into the cookie?
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-09 12:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-04 17:15 [PATCH v3 00/25] iommu: Refactor DMA domain strictness Robin Murphy
2021-08-04 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 01/25] iommu: Pull IOVA cookie management into the core Robin Murphy
2021-08-04 18:52 ` Heiko Stübner
2021-08-05 7:18 ` Marek Szyprowski
2021-08-05 9:15 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2021-08-04 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 02/25] iommu/amd: Drop IOVA cookie management Robin Murphy
2021-08-05 7:37 ` kernel test robot
2021-08-05 9:37 ` Robin Murphy
2021-08-04 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 03/25] iommu/arm-smmu: " Robin Murphy
2021-08-04 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 04/25] iommu/vt-d: " Robin Murphy
2021-08-04 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 05/25] iommu/exynos: " Robin Murphy
2021-08-05 7:19 ` Marek Szyprowski
2021-08-04 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 06/25] iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: " Robin Murphy
2021-08-05 9:15 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2021-08-04 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 07/25] iommu/mtk: " Robin Murphy
2021-08-04 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 08/25] iommu/rockchip: " Robin Murphy
2021-08-04 18:53 ` Heiko Stübner
2021-08-04 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 09/25] iommu/sprd: " Robin Murphy
2021-08-06 2:15 ` Chunyan Zhang
2021-08-04 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 10/25] iommu/sun50i: " Robin Murphy
2021-08-04 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 11/25] iommu/virtio: " Robin Murphy
2021-08-04 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 12/25] iommu/dma: Unexport " Robin Murphy
2021-08-04 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 13/25] iommu/dma: Remove redundant "!dev" checks Robin Murphy
2021-08-04 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 14/25] iommu: Indicate queued flushes via gather data Robin Murphy
2021-08-04 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 15/25] iommu/io-pgtable: Remove non-strict quirk Robin Murphy
2021-08-04 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 16/25] iommu: Introduce explicit type for non-strict DMA domains Robin Murphy
2021-08-04 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 17/25] iommu/amd: Prepare for multiple DMA domain types Robin Murphy
2021-08-04 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 18/25] iommu/arm-smmu: " Robin Murphy
2021-08-04 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 19/25] iommu/vt-d: " Robin Murphy
2021-08-04 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 20/25] iommu: Express DMA strictness via the domain type Robin Murphy
2021-08-04 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 21/25] iommu: Expose DMA domain strictness via sysfs Robin Murphy
2021-08-04 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 22/25] iommu: Only log strictness for DMA domains Robin Murphy
2021-08-04 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 23/25] iommu: Merge strictness and domain type configs Robin Murphy
2021-08-06 9:15 ` John Garry
2021-08-04 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 24/25] iommu/dma: Factor out flush queue init Robin Murphy
2021-08-09 12:52 ` Will Deacon
2021-08-09 14:47 ` Robin Murphy
2021-08-09 19:05 ` Rajat Jain
2021-08-09 19:59 ` Robin Murphy
2021-08-09 20:15 ` Rajat Jain
2021-08-04 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 25/25] iommu: Allow enabling non-strict mode dynamically Robin Murphy
2021-08-09 12:49 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2021-08-09 13:40 ` Robin Murphy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210809124931.GA1097@willie-the-truck \
--to=will@kernel.org \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chenxiang66@hisilicon.com \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rajatja@google.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).