From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A38DFC432BE for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 21:40:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8266360C3E for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 21:40:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234836AbhHIVk4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Aug 2021 17:40:56 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59668 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230039AbhHIVky (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Aug 2021 17:40:54 -0400 Received: from Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc (Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:520::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE45AC0613D3; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 14:40:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fw by Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mDD0V-0003Bz-D7; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 23:40:27 +0200 Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 23:40:27 +0200 From: Florian Westphal To: Pavel Skripkin Cc: Florian Westphal , syzbot , coreteam@netfilter.org, davem@davemloft.net, kadlec@netfilter.org, kuba@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, pablo@netfilter.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [syzbot] KASAN: use-after-free Write in nft_ct_tmpl_put_pcpu Message-ID: <20210809214027.GQ607@breakpoint.cc> References: <000000000000b720b705c8f8599f@google.com> <20210809203916.GP607@breakpoint.cc> <2d002841-402c-2bc3-2b33-3e6d1cd14c23@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2d002841-402c-2bc3-2b33-3e6d1cd14c23@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Pavel Skripkin wrote: > Dumb question: why per_cpu() will return 2 different pointers for CPU 1 and > CPU 0? As I understand for_each_possible_cpu() will iterate over all > CPUs which could ever be enabled. So, we can hit situation when 2 concurrent > processes call per_cpu() with same cpu value (*). Yes, that is what I was trying to say, the race is that we can have > 1 processes here ever since the global transaction mutex was removed in 2018. > Anyway, I think, moving locking a bit higher is good here, let's test it. I > will prepare a patch, if it will pass syzbot testing, thanks! It looks correct to me, thanks.