LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: madvenka@linux.microsoft.com To: mark.rutland@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com, ardb@kernel.org, nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com, sjitindarsingh@gmail.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org, pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, jthierry@redhat.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, madvenka@linux.microsoft.com Subject: [RFC PATCH v8 1/4] arm64: Make all stack walking functions use arch_stack_walk() Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 14:06:00 -0500 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210812190603.25326-2-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210812190603.25326-1-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> Currently, there are multiple functions in ARM64 code that walk the stack using start_backtrace() and unwind_frame(). Convert all of them to use arch_stack_walk(). This makes maintenance easier. Here is the list of functions: perf_callchain_kernel() get_wchan() return_address() dump_backtrace() profile_pc() Signed-off-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> --- arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h | 3 --- arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c | 5 +--- arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++----------- arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c | 6 +---- arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 38 +++------------------------- arch/arm64/kernel/time.c | 22 +++++++++------- 6 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h index 8aebc00c1718..e43dea1c6b41 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h @@ -61,9 +61,6 @@ struct stackframe { #endif }; -extern int unwind_frame(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame); -extern void walk_stackframe(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame, - bool (*fn)(void *, unsigned long), void *data); extern void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk, const char *loglvl); diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c index 4a72c2727309..2f289013c9c9 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c @@ -147,15 +147,12 @@ static bool callchain_trace(void *data, unsigned long pc) void perf_callchain_kernel(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry, struct pt_regs *regs) { - struct stackframe frame; - if (perf_guest_cbs && perf_guest_cbs->is_in_guest()) { /* We don't support guest os callchain now */ return; } - start_backtrace(&frame, regs->regs[29], regs->pc); - walk_stackframe(current, &frame, callchain_trace, entry); + arch_stack_walk(callchain_trace, entry, current, regs); } unsigned long perf_instruction_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c index c8989b999250..52c12fd26407 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c @@ -544,11 +544,28 @@ __notrace_funcgraph struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct task_struct *prev, return last; } +struct wchan_info { + unsigned long pc; + int count; +}; + +static bool get_wchan_cb(void *arg, unsigned long pc) +{ + struct wchan_info *wchan_info = arg; + + if (!in_sched_functions(pc)) { + wchan_info->pc = pc; + return false; + } + wchan_info->count--; + return !!wchan_info->count; +} + unsigned long get_wchan(struct task_struct *p) { - struct stackframe frame; - unsigned long stack_page, ret = 0; - int count = 0; + unsigned long stack_page; + struct wchan_info wchan_info; + if (!p || p == current || task_is_running(p)) return 0; @@ -556,20 +573,12 @@ unsigned long get_wchan(struct task_struct *p) if (!stack_page) return 0; - start_backtrace(&frame, thread_saved_fp(p), thread_saved_pc(p)); + wchan_info.pc = 0; + wchan_info.count = 16; + arch_stack_walk(get_wchan_cb, &wchan_info, p, NULL); - do { - if (unwind_frame(p, &frame)) - goto out; - if (!in_sched_functions(frame.pc)) { - ret = frame.pc; - goto out; - } - } while (count++ < 16); - -out: put_task_stack(p); - return ret; + return wchan_info.pc; } unsigned long arch_align_stack(unsigned long sp) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c index a6d18755652f..92a0f4d434e4 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c @@ -35,15 +35,11 @@ NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(save_return_addr); void *return_address(unsigned int level) { struct return_address_data data; - struct stackframe frame; data.level = level + 2; data.addr = NULL; - start_backtrace(&frame, - (unsigned long)__builtin_frame_address(0), - (unsigned long)return_address); - walk_stackframe(current, &frame, save_return_addr, &data); + arch_stack_walk(save_return_addr, &data, current, NULL); if (!data.level) return data.addr; diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c index 8982a2b78acf..1800310f92be 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c @@ -151,23 +151,21 @@ void notrace walk_stackframe(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame, } NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(walk_stackframe); -static void dump_backtrace_entry(unsigned long where, const char *loglvl) +static bool dump_backtrace_entry(void *arg, unsigned long where) { + char *loglvl = arg; printk("%s %pSb\n", loglvl, (void *)where); + return true; } void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk, const char *loglvl) { - struct stackframe frame; - int skip = 0; - pr_debug("%s(regs = %p tsk = %p)\n", __func__, regs, tsk); if (regs) { if (user_mode(regs)) return; - skip = 1; } if (!tsk) @@ -176,36 +174,8 @@ void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk, if (!try_get_task_stack(tsk)) return; - if (tsk == current) { - start_backtrace(&frame, - (unsigned long)__builtin_frame_address(0), - (unsigned long)dump_backtrace); - } else { - /* - * task blocked in __switch_to - */ - start_backtrace(&frame, - thread_saved_fp(tsk), - thread_saved_pc(tsk)); - } - printk("%sCall trace:\n", loglvl); - do { - /* skip until specified stack frame */ - if (!skip) { - dump_backtrace_entry(frame.pc, loglvl); - } else if (frame.fp == regs->regs[29]) { - skip = 0; - /* - * Mostly, this is the case where this function is - * called in panic/abort. As exception handler's - * stack frame does not contain the corresponding pc - * at which an exception has taken place, use regs->pc - * instead. - */ - dump_backtrace_entry(regs->pc, loglvl); - } - } while (!unwind_frame(tsk, &frame)); + arch_stack_walk(dump_backtrace_entry, (void *)loglvl, tsk, regs); put_task_stack(tsk); } diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c index eebbc8d7123e..671b3038a772 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c @@ -32,22 +32,26 @@ #include <asm/stacktrace.h> #include <asm/paravirt.h> +static bool profile_pc_cb(void *arg, unsigned long pc) +{ + unsigned long *prof_pc = arg; + + if (in_lock_functions(pc)) + return true; + *prof_pc = pc; + return false; +} + unsigned long profile_pc(struct pt_regs *regs) { - struct stackframe frame; + unsigned long prof_pc = 0; if (!in_lock_functions(regs->pc)) return regs->pc; - start_backtrace(&frame, regs->regs[29], regs->pc); - - do { - int ret = unwind_frame(NULL, &frame); - if (ret < 0) - return 0; - } while (in_lock_functions(frame.pc)); + arch_stack_walk(profile_pc_cb, &prof_pc, current, regs); - return frame.pc; + return prof_pc; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(profile_pc); -- 2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-12 19:06 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top [not found] <b45aac2843f16ca759e065ea547ab0afff8c0f01> 2021-08-12 19:05 ` [RFC PATCH v8 0/4] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder and implement stack trace reliability checks madvenka 2021-08-12 19:06 ` madvenka [this message] 2021-08-24 13:13 ` [RFC PATCH v8 1/4] arm64: Make all stack walking functions use arch_stack_walk() Mark Rutland 2021-08-24 17:21 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman 2021-08-24 17:38 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman 2021-08-24 17:38 ` Mark Brown 2021-08-24 17:40 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman 2021-08-26 4:52 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman 2021-10-09 23:41 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman 2021-08-12 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH v8 2/4] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder code for better consistency and maintenance madvenka 2021-08-26 15:46 ` Mark Brown 2021-08-26 23:19 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman 2021-09-01 16:20 ` Mark Brown 2021-09-02 7:10 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman 2021-08-12 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH v8 3/4] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder madvenka 2021-08-24 5:55 ` nobuta.keiya 2021-08-24 12:19 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman 2021-08-25 0:01 ` nobuta.keiya 2021-08-26 15:57 ` Mark Brown 2021-08-26 23:31 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman 2021-08-12 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH v8 4/4] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list madvenka 2021-08-12 19:17 ` [RFC PATCH v8 0/4] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder and implement stack trace reliability checks Madhavan T. Venkataraman
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20210812190603.25326-2-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com \ --to=madvenka@linux.microsoft.com \ --cc=ardb@kernel.org \ --cc=broonie@kernel.org \ --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \ --cc=jmorris@namei.org \ --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \ --cc=jthierry@redhat.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \ --cc=nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com \ --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \ --cc=sjitindarsingh@gmail.com \ --cc=will@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).