LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wei Huang <wei.huang2@amd.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
vkuznets@redhat.com, seanjc@google.com, wanpengli@tencent.com,
jmattson@google.com, joro@8bytes.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] SVM 5-level page table support
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 10:15:49 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210823151549.rkkrktvtpu6yapmd@weiserver.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c10faf24c11fc86074945ca535572a8c5926dcf9.camel@redhat.com>
On 08/23 12:20, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-08-19 at 18:43 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > On 18/08/21 18:55, Wei Huang wrote:
> > > This patch set adds 5-level page table support for AMD SVM. When the
> > > 5-level page table is enabled on host OS, the nested page table for guest
> > > VMs will use the same format as host OS (i.e. 5-level NPT). These patches
> > > were tested with various combination of different settings and test cases
> > > (nested/regular VMs, AMD64/i686 kernels, kvm-unit-tests, etc.)
> > >
> > > v2->v3:
> > > * Change the way of building root_hpa by following the existing flow (Sean)
> > >
> > > v1->v2:
> > > * Remove v1's arch-specific get_tdp_level() and add a new parameter,
> > > tdp_forced_root_level, to allow forced TDP level (Sean)
> > > * Add additional comment on tdp_root table chaining trick and change the
> > > PML root table allocation code (Sean)
> > > * Revise Patch 1's commit msg (Sean and Jim)
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > -Wei
> > >
> > > Wei Huang (3):
> > > KVM: x86: Allow CPU to force vendor-specific TDP level
> > > KVM: x86: Handle the case of 5-level shadow page table
> > > KVM: SVM: Add 5-level page table support for SVM
> > >
> > > arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 6 ++--
> > > arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> > > arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 13 ++++----
> > > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 3 +-
> > > 4 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> > >
> >
> > Queued, thanks, with NULL initializations according to Tom's review.
> >
> > Paolo
> >
>
> Hi,
> Yesterday while testing my SMM patches, I noticed a minor issue:
> It seems that this patchset breaks my 32 bit nested VM testcase with NPT=0.
>
Could you elaborate the detailed setup? NPT=0 for KVM running on L1?
Which VM is 32bit - L1 or L2?
Thanks,
-Wei
> This hack makes it work again for me (I don't yet use TDP mmu).
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index caa3f9aee7d1..c25e0d40a620 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -3562,7 +3562,7 @@ static int mmu_alloc_special_roots(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> mmu->shadow_root_level < PT64_ROOT_4LEVEL)
> return 0;
>
> - if (mmu->pae_root && mmu->pml4_root && mmu->pml5_root)
> + if (mmu->pae_root && mmu->pml4_root)
> return 0;
>
> /*
>
>
>
> Best regards,
> Maxim Levitsky
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-23 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-18 16:55 Wei Huang
2021-08-18 16:55 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] KVM: x86: Allow CPU to force vendor-specific TDP level Wei Huang
2021-08-18 16:55 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] KVM: x86: Handle the case of 5-level shadow page table Wei Huang
2021-08-18 17:15 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-08-19 16:36 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-08-18 18:00 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-18 16:55 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] KVM: SVM: Add 5-level page table support for SVM Wei Huang
2021-08-18 17:32 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-08-19 16:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-08-19 16:43 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] SVM 5-level page table support Paolo Bonzini
2021-08-23 9:20 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-08-23 15:15 ` Wei Huang [this message]
2021-08-23 16:10 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-08-23 18:10 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-08-23 18:06 ` Maxim Levitsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210823151549.rkkrktvtpu6yapmd@weiserver.amd.com \
--to=wei.huang2@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--subject='Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] SVM 5-level page table support' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).