LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	x86@kernel.org, Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
	clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Do not add -falign flags unconditionally for clang
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 19:26:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210824022640.2170859-2-nathan@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210824022640.2170859-1-nathan@kernel.org>

clang does not support -falign-jumps and only recently gained support
for -falign-loops. When one of the configuration options that adds these
flags is enabled, clang warns and all cc-{disable-warning,option} that
follow fail because -Werror gets added to test for the presence of this
warning:

clang-14: warning: optimization flag '-falign-jumps=0' is not supported
[-Wignored-optimization-argument]

To resolve this, add a couple of cc-option calls when building with
clang; gcc has supported these options since 3.2 so there is no point in
testing for their support. -falign-functions was implemented in clang-7,
-falign-loops was implemented in clang-14, and -falign-jumps has not
been implemented yet.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/YSQE2f5teuvKLkON@Ryzen-9-3900X.localdomain/
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/Makefile_32.cpu | 12 +++++++++---
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/Makefile_32.cpu b/arch/x86/Makefile_32.cpu
index cd3056759880..e8c65f990afd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Makefile_32.cpu
+++ b/arch/x86/Makefile_32.cpu
@@ -10,6 +10,12 @@ else
 tune		= $(call cc-option,-mcpu=$(1),$(2))
 endif
 
+ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG
+align		:= -falign-functions=0 $(call cc-option,-falign-jumps=0) $(call cc-option,-falign-loops=0)
+else
+align		:= -falign-functions=0 -falign-jumps=0 -falign-loops=0
+endif
+
 cflags-$(CONFIG_M486SX)		+= -march=i486
 cflags-$(CONFIG_M486)		+= -march=i486
 cflags-$(CONFIG_M586)		+= -march=i586
@@ -25,11 +31,11 @@ cflags-$(CONFIG_MK6)		+= -march=k6
 # They make zero difference whatsosever to performance at this time.
 cflags-$(CONFIG_MK7)		+= -march=athlon
 cflags-$(CONFIG_MK8)		+= $(call cc-option,-march=k8,-march=athlon)
-cflags-$(CONFIG_MCRUSOE)	+= -march=i686 -falign-functions=0 -falign-jumps=0 -falign-loops=0
-cflags-$(CONFIG_MEFFICEON)	+= -march=i686 $(call tune,pentium3) -falign-functions=0 -falign-jumps=0 -falign-loops=0
+cflags-$(CONFIG_MCRUSOE)	+= -march=i686 $(align)
+cflags-$(CONFIG_MEFFICEON)	+= -march=i686 $(call tune,pentium3) $(align)
 cflags-$(CONFIG_MWINCHIPC6)	+= $(call cc-option,-march=winchip-c6,-march=i586)
 cflags-$(CONFIG_MWINCHIP3D)	+= $(call cc-option,-march=winchip2,-march=i586)
-cflags-$(CONFIG_MCYRIXIII)	+= $(call cc-option,-march=c3,-march=i486) -falign-functions=0 -falign-jumps=0 -falign-loops=0
+cflags-$(CONFIG_MCYRIXIII)	+= $(call cc-option,-march=c3,-march=i486) $(align)
 cflags-$(CONFIG_MVIAC3_2)	+= $(call cc-option,-march=c3-2,-march=i686)
 cflags-$(CONFIG_MVIAC7)		+= -march=i686
 cflags-$(CONFIG_MCORE2)		+= -march=i686 $(call tune,core2)
-- 
2.33.0


  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-24  2:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-24  2:26 [PATCH 0/2] Harden clang against unknown flag options Nathan Chancellor
2021-08-24  2:26 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2021-08-24  2:56   ` [PATCH 1/2] x86: Do not add -falign flags unconditionally for clang Fangrui Song
2021-08-24 21:53     ` Nathan Chancellor
2021-08-25 22:32   ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-09-16 17:18   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-09-16 18:42     ` Nathan Chancellor
2021-09-16 19:05       ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-24  2:26 ` [PATCH 2/2] kbuild: Add -Werror=ignored-optimization-argument to CLANG_FLAGS Nathan Chancellor
2021-08-25 22:27   ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-09-13 18:08 ` [PATCH 0/2] Harden clang against unknown flag options Nathan Chancellor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210824022640.2170859-2-nathan@kernel.org \
    --to=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Do not add -falign flags unconditionally for clang' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).