LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: sudeep.holla@arm.com, james.quinlan@broadcom.com,
Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
etienne.carriere@linaro.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
souvik.chakravarty@arm.com, cristian.marussi@arm.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 07/12] clk: scmi: Support atomic enable/disable API
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 14:59:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210824135941.38656-8-cristian.marussi@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210824135941.38656-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Support enable/disable clk_ops instead of prepare/unprepare when the
underlying SCMI transport is configured to support atomic transactions for
synchronous commands.
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
---
drivers/clk/clk-scmi.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-scmi.c b/drivers/clk/clk-scmi.c
index 1e357d364ca2..a07117d5e5bd 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk-scmi.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk-scmi.c
@@ -88,21 +88,42 @@ static void scmi_clk_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
scmi_proto_clk_ops->disable(clk->ph, clk->id);
}
+/*
+ * We can provide enable/disable atomic callbacks only if the underlying SCMI
+ * transport for this SCMI instance is configured to handle synchronous commands
+ * in an atomic manner.
+ *
+ * When no SCMI atomic transport support is available we instead provide the
+ * prepare/unprepare API, as allowed by the clock framework where atomic calls
+ * are not available.
+ *
+ * Note that the provided clk_ops implementations are the same in both cases,
+ * using indeed the same underlying SCMI clock_protocol operations, it's just
+ * that they are assured to act in an atomic manner or not depending on the
+ * actual underlying SCMI transport configuration.
+ *
+ * Two distinct sets of clk_ops are provided since we could have multiple SCMI
+ * instances with different underlying transport quality, so they cannot be
+ * shared.
+ */
static const struct clk_ops scmi_clk_ops = {
.recalc_rate = scmi_clk_recalc_rate,
.round_rate = scmi_clk_round_rate,
.set_rate = scmi_clk_set_rate,
- /*
- * We can't provide enable/disable callback as we can't perform the same
- * in atomic context. Since the clock framework provides standard API
- * clk_prepare_enable that helps cases using clk_enable in non-atomic
- * context, it should be fine providing prepare/unprepare.
- */
.prepare = scmi_clk_enable,
.unprepare = scmi_clk_disable,
};
-static int scmi_clk_ops_init(struct device *dev, struct scmi_clk *sclk)
+static const struct clk_ops scmi_atomic_clk_ops = {
+ .recalc_rate = scmi_clk_recalc_rate,
+ .round_rate = scmi_clk_round_rate,
+ .set_rate = scmi_clk_set_rate,
+ .enable = scmi_clk_enable,
+ .disable = scmi_clk_disable,
+};
+
+static int scmi_clk_ops_init(struct device *dev, struct scmi_clk *sclk,
+ const struct clk_ops *scmi_ops)
{
int ret;
unsigned long min_rate, max_rate;
@@ -110,7 +131,7 @@ static int scmi_clk_ops_init(struct device *dev, struct scmi_clk *sclk)
struct clk_init_data init = {
.flags = CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE,
.num_parents = 0,
- .ops = &scmi_clk_ops,
+ .ops = scmi_ops,
.name = sclk->info->name,
};
@@ -145,6 +166,7 @@ static int scmi_clocks_probe(struct scmi_device *sdev)
struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
const struct scmi_handle *handle = sdev->handle;
struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph;
+ bool is_atomic;
if (!handle)
return -ENODEV;
@@ -168,6 +190,8 @@ static int scmi_clocks_probe(struct scmi_device *sdev)
clk_data->num = count;
hws = clk_data->hws;
+ is_atomic = handle->is_transport_atomic(handle);
+
for (idx = 0; idx < count; idx++) {
struct scmi_clk *sclk;
@@ -184,7 +208,9 @@ static int scmi_clocks_probe(struct scmi_device *sdev)
sclk->id = idx;
sclk->ph = ph;
- err = scmi_clk_ops_init(dev, sclk);
+ err = scmi_clk_ops_init(dev, sclk,
+ is_atomic ? &scmi_atomic_clk_ops :
+ &scmi_clk_ops);
if (err) {
dev_err(dev, "failed to register clock %d\n", idx);
devm_kfree(dev, sclk);
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-24 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-24 13:59 [PATCH v4 0/12] Introduce atomic support for SCMI transports Cristian Marussi
2021-08-24 13:59 ` [PATCH v4 01/12] firmware: arm_scmi: Perform earlier cinfo lookup call in do_xfer Cristian Marussi
2021-08-25 16:28 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-08-24 13:59 ` [PATCH v4 02/12] firmware: arm_scmi: Add configurable polling mode for transports Cristian Marussi
2021-08-25 16:29 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-08-24 13:59 ` [PATCH v4 03/12] firmware: arm_scmi: Add support for atomic transports Cristian Marussi
2021-08-25 16:18 ` Jim Quinlan
2021-08-25 17:50 ` Cristian Marussi
2021-08-24 13:59 ` [PATCH v4 04/12] include: trace: Add new scmi_xfer_response_wait event Cristian Marussi
2021-08-25 16:30 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-08-24 13:59 ` [PATCH v4 05/12] firmware: arm_scmi: Use new trace event scmi_xfer_response_wait Cristian Marussi
2021-08-25 16:31 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-08-25 17:52 ` Cristian Marussi
2021-08-24 13:59 ` [PATCH v4 06/12] firmware: arm_scmi: Add is_transport_atomic() handle method Cristian Marussi
2021-08-25 16:32 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-08-24 13:59 ` Cristian Marussi [this message]
2021-08-25 16:33 ` [PATCH v4 07/12] clk: scmi: Support atomic enable/disable API Florian Fainelli
2021-08-24 13:59 ` [PATCH v4 08/12] firmware: arm_scmi: Declare virtio transport .atomic_capable Cristian Marussi
2021-08-24 13:59 ` [PATCH v4 09/12] [RFC] firmware: arm_scmi: Make smc transport use common completions Cristian Marussi
2021-08-25 16:35 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-08-24 13:59 ` [PATCH v4 10/12] [RFC] firmware: arm_scmi: Make smc transport atomic Cristian Marussi
2021-08-24 13:59 ` [PATCH v4 11/12] [RFC] firmware: arm_scmi: Add sync_cmds_atomic_replies transport flag Cristian Marussi
2021-08-25 16:38 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-08-25 17:17 ` Jim Quinlan
2021-08-25 18:49 ` Cristian Marussi
2021-08-26 18:29 ` Jim Quinlan
2021-08-31 5:56 ` Cristian Marussi
2021-09-23 15:03 ` Cristian Marussi
2021-10-04 17:50 ` Jim Quinlan
2021-10-04 18:00 ` Cristian Marussi
2021-08-24 13:59 ` [PATCH v4 12/12] [RFC] firmware: arm_scmi: Make smc support atomic commands replies Cristian Marussi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210824135941.38656-8-cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--to=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com \
--cc=etienne.carriere@linaro.org \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=souvik.chakravarty@arm.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--subject='Re: [PATCH v4 07/12] clk: scmi: Support atomic enable/disable API' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).