LKML Archive on
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Len Baker <>
To: Jonathan Corbet <>, Kees Cook <>
Cc: Len Baker <>,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <>,
	Joe Perches <>,,,
Subject: [PATCH] docs: deprecated.rst: Clarify open-coded arithmetic with literals
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 19:12:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)

Although using literals for size calculation in allocator arguments may
be harmless due to compiler warnings in case of overflows, it is better
to refactor the code to avoid the use of open-coded math idiom.

So, clarify the preferred way in these cases.

Suggested-by: Kees Cook <>
Signed-off-by: Len Baker <>
 Documentation/process/deprecated.rst | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/process/deprecated.rst b/Documentation/process/deprecated.rst
index 9d83b8db8874..fdfafdefe296 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/deprecated.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/deprecated.rst
@@ -60,7 +60,8 @@ smaller allocation being made than the caller was expecting. Using those
 allocations could lead to linear overflows of heap memory and other
 misbehaviors. (One exception to this is literal values where the compiler
 can warn if they might overflow. Though using literals for arguments as
-suggested below is also harmless.)
+suggested below is also harmless. So, the preferred way in these cases is
+to refactor the code to keep the open-coded math idiom out.)

 For example, do not use ``count * size`` as an argument, as in::


             reply	other threads:[~2021-08-27 17:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-27 17:12 Len Baker [this message]
2021-08-27 19:06 ` Joe Perches
2021-08-27 19:22   ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2021-08-29 14:32   ` Len Baker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] docs: deprecated.rst: Clarify open-coded arithmetic with literals' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).