LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>
To: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com>
Cc: "Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>,
"Masami Hiramatsu" <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI: uniphier: Fix INTx mask/unmask bit operation and remove ack function
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 17:59:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210830155945.yuirq5tsy2migovk@pali> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1630290158-31264-2-git-send-email-hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com>
On Monday 30 August 2021 11:22:37 Kunihiko Hayashi wrote:
> INTX mask and unmask fields in PCL_RCV_INTX register should only be
> set/reset for each bit. Clearing by PCL_RCV_INTX_ALL_MASK should be
> removed.
>
> INTX status fields in PCL_RCV_INTX register only indicates each INTX
> interrupt status, so the handler can't clear by writing 1 to the field.
> The status is expected to be cleared by the interrupt origin.
> The ack function has no meaning, so should remove it.
>
> Fixes: 7e6d5cd88a6f ("PCI: uniphier: Add UniPhier PCIe host controller support")
> Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com>
Acked-by: Pali Rohár <pali@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier.c | 16 ----------------
> 1 file changed, 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier.c
> index ebe43e9..26f630c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier.c
> @@ -181,19 +181,6 @@ static void uniphier_pcie_irq_enable(struct uniphier_pcie_priv *priv)
> writel(PCL_RCV_INTX_ALL_ENABLE, priv->base + PCL_RCV_INTX);
> }
>
> -static void uniphier_pcie_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d)
> -{
> - struct pcie_port *pp = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> - struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
> - struct uniphier_pcie_priv *priv = to_uniphier_pcie(pci);
> - u32 val;
> -
> - val = readl(priv->base + PCL_RCV_INTX);
> - val &= ~PCL_RCV_INTX_ALL_STATUS;
> - val |= BIT(irqd_to_hwirq(d) + PCL_RCV_INTX_STATUS_SHIFT);
> - writel(val, priv->base + PCL_RCV_INTX);
> -}
> -
> static void uniphier_pcie_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
> {
> struct pcie_port *pp = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> @@ -202,7 +189,6 @@ static void uniphier_pcie_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
> u32 val;
>
> val = readl(priv->base + PCL_RCV_INTX);
> - val &= ~PCL_RCV_INTX_ALL_MASK;
> val |= BIT(irqd_to_hwirq(d) + PCL_RCV_INTX_MASK_SHIFT);
> writel(val, priv->base + PCL_RCV_INTX);
> }
> @@ -215,14 +201,12 @@ static void uniphier_pcie_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
> u32 val;
>
> val = readl(priv->base + PCL_RCV_INTX);
> - val &= ~PCL_RCV_INTX_ALL_MASK;
> val &= ~BIT(irqd_to_hwirq(d) + PCL_RCV_INTX_MASK_SHIFT);
> writel(val, priv->base + PCL_RCV_INTX);
> }
>
> static struct irq_chip uniphier_pcie_irq_chip = {
> .name = "PCI",
> - .irq_ack = uniphier_pcie_irq_ack,
> .irq_mask = uniphier_pcie_irq_mask,
> .irq_unmask = uniphier_pcie_irq_unmask,
> };
> --
> 2.7.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-30 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-30 2:22 [PATCH v2 0/2] PCI: uniphier: Fix INTx masking/unmasking Kunihiko Hayashi
2021-08-30 2:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI: uniphier: Fix INTx mask/unmask bit operation and remove ack function Kunihiko Hayashi
2021-08-30 15:59 ` Pali Rohár [this message]
2021-08-30 2:22 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] PCI: uniphier: Serialize INTx masking/unmasking Kunihiko Hayashi
2021-09-16 11:30 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] PCI: uniphier: Fix " Kunihiko Hayashi
2021-09-17 13:54 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-09-17 23:48 ` Kunihiko Hayashi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210830155945.yuirq5tsy2migovk@pali \
--to=pali@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--subject='Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI: uniphier: Fix INTx mask/unmask bit operation and remove ack function' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).