From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C12EC432BE for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 09:24:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2179F60462 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 09:24:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S243526AbhIAJZS (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Sep 2021 05:25:18 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:49836 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S243420AbhIAJZQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Sep 2021 05:25:16 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C985B60462; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 09:24:19 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 11:24:17 +0200 From: Christian Brauner To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] sys fixes Message-ID: <20210901092417.ulwfo3qriyptjkio@wittgenstein> References: <20210831100326.2298176-1-christian.brauner@ubuntu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 12:23:57PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 3:03 AM Christian Brauner > wrote: > > > > This contains a single fix to set_user() which aligns permission checks with > > the corresponding fork() codepath. > > Pulled. > > That single commit is odd, though. It has strange formatting, it got > the first-line summary rule wrong, and it has the "cc:" list > corruption that should just have been fixed up. > > Not any real problems, but sloppy editing that I started looking at > because the one-liner shortlog didn't make sense. Hm, sorry about that. It seems that my git am scripts for b4 might be getting in the way of older scripts. Strange. That won't happen again.