LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: don't unconditionally copy_from_user a struct ifreq for socket ioctls
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 16:20:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210901162011.3ce5f012@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMn1gO5OmHg_10s698tNqf4X-hJ_gn17D8afyRhbW1nKpvLzWQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 1 Sep 2021 11:01:32 -0700 Peter Collingbourne wrote:
> > > To stop the copy_from_user() faulting when the user buffer
> > > isn't long enough.
> > > In particular for iasatty() on arm with tagged pointers.
> >
> > Let me rephrase. is_socket_ioctl_cmd() is always true here. There were
> > only two callers, both check cmd is of specific, "sockety" type.
>
> I see, it looks like we don't need the check on the compat path then.
>
> I can send a followup to clean this up but given that I got a comment
> from another reviewer saying that we should try to make the native and
> compat paths as similar as possible, maybe it isn't too bad to leave
> things as is?
I have a weak preference to get rid of it, the code is a little
complex and extra dead code makes it harder to follow, but up to you.
IMO the "right place" for the check is:
static long sock_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned cmd, unsigned long arg)
[...]
default:
/* --> here <-- */
err = sock_do_ioctl(net, sock, cmd, arg);
break;
Since that's the point where we take all the remaining cmd values and
call a function which assumes struct ifreq.
Compat code does not have a default statement.
But as I said no big deal, feel free to ignore.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-01 23:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-26 19:46 Peter Collingbourne
2021-08-27 8:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2021-08-31 16:30 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-09-01 8:22 ` David Laight
2021-09-01 14:03 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-09-01 18:01 ` Peter Collingbourne
2021-09-01 23:20 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210901162011.3ce5f012@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
--cc=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=cong.wang@bytedance.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pcc@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--subject='Re: [PATCH v2] net: don'\''t unconditionally copy_from_user a struct ifreq for socket ioctls' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).