LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: elver@google.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
Walter Wu <walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Vijayanand Jitta <vjitta@codeaurora.org>,
Vinayak Menon <vinmenon@codeaurora.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh@google.com>,
Taras Madan <tarasmadan@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/6] stackdepot, kasan, workqueue: Avoid expanding stackdepot slabs when holding raw_spin_lock
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 16:13:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210907141307.1437816-1-elver@google.com> (raw)
Shuah Khan reported [1]:
| When CONFIG_PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING=y and CONFIG_KASAN are enabled,
| kasan_record_aux_stack() runs into "BUG: Invalid wait context" when
| it tries to allocate memory attempting to acquire spinlock in page
| allocation code while holding workqueue pool raw_spinlock.
|
| There are several instances of this problem when block layer tries
| to __queue_work(). Call trace from one of these instances is below:
|
| kblockd_mod_delayed_work_on()
| mod_delayed_work_on()
| __queue_delayed_work()
| __queue_work() (rcu_read_lock, raw_spin_lock pool->lock held)
| insert_work()
| kasan_record_aux_stack()
| kasan_save_stack()
| stack_depot_save()
| alloc_pages()
| __alloc_pages()
| get_page_from_freelist()
| rm_queue()
| rm_queue_pcplist()
| local_lock_irqsave(&pagesets.lock, flags);
| [ BUG: Invalid wait context triggered ]
[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210902200134.25603-1-skhan@linuxfoundation.org
PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING is pointing out that (on RT kernels) the locking
rules are being violated. More generally, memory is being allocated from
a non-preemptive context (raw_spin_lock'd c-s) where it is not allowed.
To properly fix this, we must prevent stackdepot from replenishing its
"stack slab" pool if memory allocations cannot be done in the current
context: it's a bug to use either GFP_ATOMIC nor GFP_NOWAIT in certain
non-preemptive contexts, including raw_spin_locks (see gfp.h and
ab00db216c9c7).
The only downside is that saving a stack trace may fail if: stackdepot
runs out of space AND the same stack trace has not been recorded before.
I expect this to be unlikely, and a simple experiment (boot the kernel)
didn't result in any failure to record stack trace from insert_work().
The series includes a few minor fixes to stackdepot that I noticed in
preparing the series. It then introduces __stack_depot_save(), which
exposes the option to force stackdepot to not allocate any memory.
Finally, KASAN is changed to use the new stackdepot interface and
provide kasan_record_aux_stack_noalloc(), which is then used by
workqueue code.
Marco Elver (6):
lib/stackdepot: include gfp.h
lib/stackdepot: remove unused function argument
lib/stackdepot: introduce __stack_depot_save()
kasan: common: provide can_alloc in kasan_save_stack()
kasan: generic: introduce kasan_record_aux_stack_noalloc()
workqueue, kasan: avoid alloc_pages() when recording stack
include/linux/kasan.h | 2 ++
include/linux/stackdepot.h | 6 +++++
kernel/workqueue.c | 2 +-
lib/stackdepot.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
mm/kasan/common.c | 6 ++---
mm/kasan/generic.c | 14 +++++++++--
mm/kasan/kasan.h | 2 +-
7 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
--
2.33.0.153.gba50c8fa24-goog
next reply other threads:[~2021-09-07 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-07 14:13 Marco Elver [this message]
2021-09-07 14:13 ` [PATCH 1/6] lib/stackdepot: include gfp.h Marco Elver
2021-09-14 12:11 ` Alexander Potapenko
2021-09-07 14:13 ` [PATCH 2/6] lib/stackdepot: remove unused function argument Marco Elver
2021-09-14 12:12 ` Alexander Potapenko
2021-09-07 14:13 ` [PATCH 3/6] lib/stackdepot: introduce __stack_depot_save() Marco Elver
2021-09-10 14:08 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-09-07 14:13 ` [PATCH 4/6] kasan: common: provide can_alloc in kasan_save_stack() Marco Elver
2021-09-07 14:13 ` [PATCH 5/6] kasan: generic: introduce kasan_record_aux_stack_noalloc() Marco Elver
2021-09-07 14:13 ` [PATCH 6/6] workqueue, kasan: avoid alloc_pages() when recording stack Marco Elver
2021-09-07 16:39 ` Tejun Heo
2021-09-07 14:17 ` [PATCH 0/6] stackdepot, kasan, workqueue: Avoid expanding stackdepot slabs when holding raw_spin_lock Marco Elver
2021-09-07 20:05 ` Shuah Khan
2021-09-10 10:50 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-09-10 15:28 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-09-13 6:00 ` Marco Elver
2021-09-14 12:55 ` Alexander Potapenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210907141307.1437816-1-elver@google.com \
--to=elver@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nogikh@google.com \
--cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=tarasmadan@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vinmenon@codeaurora.org \
--cc=vjitta@codeaurora.org \
--cc=walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com \
--subject='Re: [PATCH 0/6] stackdepot, kasan, workqueue: Avoid expanding stackdepot slabs when holding raw_spin_lock' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).