From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01D9FC433EF for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 02:47:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D896160E97 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 02:47:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1347338AbhIHCsl (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Sep 2021 22:48:41 -0400 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.142]:51498 "EHLO fllv0016.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1345390AbhIHCsh (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Sep 2021 22:48:37 -0400 Received: from lelv0265.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.224]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 1882lPdn101267; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 21:47:25 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1631069245; bh=7EcX9InYVySA5sqeGbQN5WvTqoO1xNHAkEBhg6Y4sPo=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=d22YljuuiTS6zq9m+voo1+geE45mybBysnsHAH4kV8fZkhQx7i5zc0maOrPVUmD4T A814xiSGsnzgeF+rXy9YROBn6dzI0Y7nVg4GJHr/ucibcVsnNiaDbd2q3oYmGBz9Wn VNLbkyqJazGRgv9eq4350dmRwle8QzUxYRVwzw6o= Received: from DLEE113.ent.ti.com (dlee113.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.24]) by lelv0265.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 1882lOfO090825 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 7 Sep 2021 21:47:24 -0500 Received: from DLEE100.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.30) by DLEE113.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2308.14; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 21:47:24 -0500 Received: from fllv0040.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.20) by DLEE100.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2308.14 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 21:47:24 -0500 Received: from localhost (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0040.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 1882lOoE069693; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 21:47:24 -0500 Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 21:47:24 -0500 From: Nishanth Menon To: Jan Kiszka CC: Aswath Govindraju , Tero Kristo , Rob Herring , , , , Bao Cheng Su , Chao Zeng Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64: dts: ti: iot2050: Flip mmc device ordering on Advanced devices Message-ID: <20210908024724.v76ff5xjlqaddww6@attendant> References: <8e2e435ef67868cb98382b44c51ddb5c8d045d66.1631024536.git.jan.kiszka@siemens.com> <20210907151301.7fqwmc7hmcyhhybv@carve> <35e0cadf-526c-6402-fb8e-8cdb8b7a0bfe@siemens.com> <20210907152746.fbddtkktvx6hb5ti@cattishly> <20210907153547.53cc2zx23rx72kqf@thyself> <482dddc1-b1f8-15db-a0c5-0d6def5d859f@ti.com> <20210907165316.4s3jrouctcpc3kvo@pessimism> <4cb6e76e-479f-5e06-778a-4788be53afb9@siemens.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4cb6e76e-479f-5e06-778a-4788be53afb9@siemens.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 22:28-20210907, Jan Kiszka wrote: [...] > > Yes, I am suggesting a flip in the order and this order can be applied > > across all the K3 SoC's > > > > I'm not sure what you are suggesting. I've sent v2 already which moves > aliasing to SoC level, and I would push that to U-Boot as well if > acceptable. If not, we will keep this in our board DTs. > responded in context of v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210908024442.jskmqqye432p4nmt@gatherer/ -- Regards, Nishanth Menon Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D