LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Prasad Malisetty <pmaliset@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
	agross@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
	bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com,
	svarbanov@mm-sol.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dianders@chromium.org,
	mka@chromium.org, vbadigan@codeaurora.org,
	sallenki@codeaurora.org, manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] PCI: qcom: Switch pcie_1_pipe_clk_src after PHY init in SC7280
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 13:08:15 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210909180815.GA997402@bjorn-Precision-5520> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5fae4f586edfde4f615a8ea6a309fbff@codeaurora.org>

On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 11:21:22PM +0530, Prasad Malisetty wrote:
> On 2021-08-31 21:07, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 12:07:30PM +0530, Prasad Malisetty wrote:
> > > On 2021-08-26 18:07, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 2:22 AM Prasad Malisetty
> > > > <pmaliset@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On 2021-08-26 02:55, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > > > > [+cc linux-pci; patches to drivers/pci/ should always be cc'd there]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 07:30:09PM +0000, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > > > >> Quoting Prasad Malisetty (2021-08-24 01:10:48)
> > > > > >> > On 2021-08-17 22:56, Prasad Malisetty wrote:
> > > > > >> > > On 2021-08-10 09:38, Prasad Malisetty wrote:
> > > > > >> > >> On the SC7280, By default the clock source for pcie_1_pipe is
> > > > > >> > >> TCXO for gdsc enable. But after the PHY is initialized, the clock
> > > > > >> > >> source must be switched to gcc_pcie_1_pipe_clk from TCXO.
> > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Prasad Malisetty <pmaliset@codeaurora.org>
> > > > > >> > >> ---
> > > > > >> > >>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > >> > >>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
> > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> > > > > >> > >> b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> > > > > >> > >> index 8a7a300..39e3b21 100644
> > > > > >> > >> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> > > > > >> > >> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> > > > > >> > >> @@ -166,6 +166,8 @@ struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_7_0 {
> > > > > >> > >>      struct regulator_bulk_data supplies[2];
> > > > > >> > >>      struct reset_control *pci_reset;
> > > > > >> > >>      struct clk *pipe_clk;
> > > > > >> > >> +    struct clk *gcc_pcie_1_pipe_clk_src;
> > > > > >> > >> +    struct clk *phy_pipe_clk;
> > > > > >> > >>  };
> > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > >> > >>  union qcom_pcie_resources {
> > > > > >> > >> @@ -1167,6 +1169,16 @@ static int qcom_pcie_get_resources_2_7_0(struct
> > > > > >> > >> qcom_pcie *pcie)
> > > > > >> > >>      if (ret < 0)
> > > > > >> > >>              return ret;
> > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > >> > >> +    if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "qcom,pcie-sc7280")) {
> > > > > >> > >> +            res->gcc_pcie_1_pipe_clk_src = devm_clk_get(dev, "pipe_mux");
> > > > > >> > >> +            if (IS_ERR(res->gcc_pcie_1_pipe_clk_src))
> > > > > >> > >> +                    return PTR_ERR(res->gcc_pcie_1_pipe_clk_src);
> > > > > >> > >> +
> > > > > >> > >> +            res->phy_pipe_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "phy_pipe");
> > > > > >> > >> +            if (IS_ERR(res->phy_pipe_clk))
> > > > > >> > >> +                    return PTR_ERR(res->phy_pipe_clk);
> > > > > >> > >> +    }
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > I would like to check is there any other better
> > > > > >> > > approach instead of compatible method here as well or
> > > > > >> > > is it fine to use compatible method.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> I'd prefer the compatible method. If nobody is responding
> > > > > >> then it's best to just resend the patches with the
> > > > > >> approach you prefer instead of waiting for someone to
> > > > > >> respond to a review comment.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm missing some context here, so I'm not exactly sure
> > > > > > what your question is, Prasad, but IMO drivers generally
> > > > > > should not need to use of_device_is_compatible() if
> > > > > > they've already called of_device_get_match_data() (as
> > > > > > qcom_pcie_probe() has).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > of_device_is_compatible() does basically the same work of
> > > > > > looking for a match in qcom_pcie_match[] that
> > > > > > of_device_get_match_data() does, so it seems pointless to
> > > > > > repeat it.
> > > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > > > I am a little confused because while [1] adds "qcom,pcie-sc7280" to
> > > > > > qcom,pcie.txt, I don't see a patch that adds it to qcom_pcie_match[].
> > > >
> > > > Either that's missing or there's a fallback to 8250 that's not
> > > > documented.
> > > >
> > > > > I agree on your point, but the main reason is to use compatible in
> > > > > get_resources_2_7_0 is same hardware version. For SM8250 & SC7280
> > > > > platforms, the hw version is same. Since we can't have a separate ops
> > > > > for SC7280, we are using compatible method in get_resources_2_7_0 to
> > > > > differentiate SM8250 and SC7280.
> > > >
> > > > Then fix the match data to be not just ops, but ops and the flag you
> > > > need here.
> > > 
> > > This difference is not universal across all the platforms but
> > > instead this is specific to SC7280.  Hence it make sense to use
> > > compatible other than going for a flag.
> > 
> > There's no reason your qcom_pcie_match[].data pointers need to be
> > strictly based on the hardware version.
> > 
> > You can do something like what pcie-brcmstb.c does, e.g.,
> > 
> >   struct pcie_cfg_data {
> >     struct qcom_pcie_ops *ops;
> >     unsigned int pipe_mux:1;
> >   };
> > 
> >   static const struct pcie_cfg_data sm8250_cfg = {
> >     .ops = &ops_1_9_0,
> >   };
> > 
> >   static const struct pcie_cfg_data sc7280_cfg = {
> >     .ops = &ops_1_9_0,
> >     .pipe_mux = 1,
> >   };
> > 
> >   static const struct of_device_id qcom_pcie_match[] = {
> >     { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-sm8250", .data = &sm8250_cfg },
> >     { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-sc7280", .data = &sc7280_cfg },
> >   };
> 
> I have one quick query, If we use above approach, we should change platform
> data reading in PCIe probe to differentiate remaining platforms right.
> expect SM8250 and SC7280 all other platforms are using same qcom_pcie_ops
> structure pointer as data.

Yes.  of_device_get_match_data() must return the same type of pointer
(in the example above, "struct pcie_cfg_data *") for all platforms.
So you would have to add a struct for each of them, and each struct
would contain the ops pointer (&ops_1_0_0, &ops_2_1_0, etc).

Thanks for working on this!

Bjorn

      reply	other threads:[~2021-09-09 18:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-10  4:08 [PATCH v5 0/4] Add DT bindings and DT nodes for PCIe and PHY " Prasad Malisetty
2021-08-10  4:08 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] dt-bindings: pci: qcom: Document PCIe bindings for SC7280 Prasad Malisetty
2021-08-10  4:08 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add PCIe and PHY related nodes Prasad Malisetty
2021-08-10 19:25   ` Stephen Boyd
2021-08-10 19:31   ` Stephen Boyd
2021-08-17  8:03     ` Prasad Malisetty
2021-08-12  6:07   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-08-17  6:00     ` Prasad Malisetty
2021-08-10  4:08 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add PCIe nodes for IDP board Prasad Malisetty
2021-08-10 19:32   ` Stephen Boyd
2021-08-10  4:08 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] PCI: qcom: Switch pcie_1_pipe_clk_src after PHY init in SC7280 Prasad Malisetty
2021-08-10 19:37   ` Stephen Boyd
2021-08-17  6:40     ` Prasad Malisetty
2021-08-12  6:11   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-08-17  6:37     ` Prasad Malisetty
2021-08-17 17:26   ` Prasad Malisetty
2021-08-24  8:10     ` Prasad Malisetty
2021-08-25 19:30       ` Stephen Boyd
2021-08-25 21:25         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-26  7:21           ` Prasad Malisetty
2021-08-26 12:37             ` Rob Herring
2021-08-31  6:37               ` Prasad Malisetty
2021-08-31 15:37                 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-09-09 17:51                   ` Prasad Malisetty
2021-09-09 18:08                     ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210909180815.GA997402@bjorn-Precision-5520 \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=agross@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=mka@chromium.org \
    --cc=pmaliset@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sallenki@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=svarbanov@mm-sol.com \
    --cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
    --cc=vbadigan@codeaurora.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] PCI: qcom: Switch pcie_1_pipe_clk_src after PHY init in SC7280' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).