LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
Walter Wu <walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Vijayanand Jitta <vjitta@codeaurora.org>,
Vinayak Menon <vinmenon@codeaurora.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh@google.com>,
Taras Madan <tarasmadan@google.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] stackdepot, kasan, workqueue: Avoid expanding stackdepot slabs when holding raw_spin_lock
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 17:28:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210910152819.ir5b2yijkqly3o6l@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1b1569ac-1144-4f9c-6938-b9d79c6743de@suse.cz>
On 2021-09-10 12:50:51 [+0200], Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > Thank you. Tested all the 6 patches in this series on Linux 5.14. This problem
> > exists in 5.13 and needs to be marked for both 5.14 and 5.13 stable releases.
>
> I think if this problem manifests only with CONFIG_PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING
> then it shouldn't be backported to stable. CONFIG_PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING is
> an experimental/development option to earlier discover what will collide
> with RT lock semantics, without needing the full RT tree.
> Thus, good to fix going forward, but not necessary to stable backport.
Acked-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
for the series. Thank you.
As for the backport I agree here with Vlastimil.
I pulled it into my RT tree for some testing and it looked good. I had
to
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -3030,7 +3030,7 @@ __call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func)
head->func = func;
head->next = NULL;
local_irq_save(flags);
- kasan_record_aux_stack(head);
+ kasan_record_aux_stack_noalloc(head);
rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data);
/* Add the callback to our list. */
We could move kasan_record_aux_stack() before that local_irq_save() but
then call_rcu() can be called preempt-disabled section so we would have
the same problem.
The second warning came from kasan_quarantine_remove_cache(). At the end
per_cpu_remove_cache() -> qlist_free_all() will free memory with
disabled interrupts (due to that smp-function call).
Moving it to kworker would solve the problem. I don't mind keeping that
smp_function call assuming that it is all debug-code and it increases
overall latency anyway. But then could we maybe move all those objects
to a single list which freed after on_each_cpu()?
Otherwise I haven't seen any new warnings showing up with KASAN enabled.
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-10 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-07 14:13 Marco Elver
2021-09-07 14:13 ` [PATCH 1/6] lib/stackdepot: include gfp.h Marco Elver
2021-09-14 12:11 ` Alexander Potapenko
2021-09-07 14:13 ` [PATCH 2/6] lib/stackdepot: remove unused function argument Marco Elver
2021-09-14 12:12 ` Alexander Potapenko
2021-09-07 14:13 ` [PATCH 3/6] lib/stackdepot: introduce __stack_depot_save() Marco Elver
2021-09-10 14:08 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-09-07 14:13 ` [PATCH 4/6] kasan: common: provide can_alloc in kasan_save_stack() Marco Elver
2021-09-07 14:13 ` [PATCH 5/6] kasan: generic: introduce kasan_record_aux_stack_noalloc() Marco Elver
2021-09-07 14:13 ` [PATCH 6/6] workqueue, kasan: avoid alloc_pages() when recording stack Marco Elver
2021-09-07 16:39 ` Tejun Heo
2021-09-07 14:17 ` [PATCH 0/6] stackdepot, kasan, workqueue: Avoid expanding stackdepot slabs when holding raw_spin_lock Marco Elver
2021-09-07 20:05 ` Shuah Khan
2021-09-10 10:50 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-09-10 15:28 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2021-09-13 6:00 ` Marco Elver
2021-09-14 12:55 ` Alexander Potapenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210910152819.ir5b2yijkqly3o6l@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nogikh@google.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=tarasmadan@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vinmenon@codeaurora.org \
--cc=vjitta@codeaurora.org \
--cc=walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com \
--subject='Re: [PATCH 0/6] stackdepot, kasan, workqueue: Avoid expanding stackdepot slabs when holding raw_spin_lock' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).