LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
To: shuah@kernel.org, davidgow@google.com, arnd@arndb.de,
	keescook@chromium.org, rafael@kernel.org, jic23@kernel.org,
	lars@metafoo.de, ulf.hansson@linaro.org,
	andreas.noever@gmail.com, michael.jamet@intel.com,
	mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com, YehezkelShB@gmail.com,
	masahiroy@kernel.org, michal.lkml@markovi.net,
	ndesaulniers@google.com
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
	Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 0/6] kunit: build kunit tests without structleak plugin
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 23:10:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210917061104.2680133-1-brendanhiggins@google.com> (raw)

The structleak plugin causes the stack frame size to grow immensely when
used with KUnit; this is caused because KUnit allocates lots of
moderately sized structs on the stack as part of its assertion macro
implementation. For most tests with small to moderately sized tests
cases there are never enough KUnit assertions to be an issue at all;
even when a single test cases has many KUnit assertions, the compiler
should never put all these struct allocations on the stack at the same
time since the scope of the structs is so limited; however, the
structleak plugin does not seem to respect the compiler doing the right
thing and will still warn of excessive stack size in some cases.

These patches are not a permanent solution since new tests can be added
with huge test cases, but this serves as a stop gap to stop structleak
from being used on KUnit tests which will currently result in excessive
stack size.

Of the following patches, I think the thunderbolt patch may be
unnecessary since Linus already fixed that test. Additionally, I was not
able to reproduce the error on the sdhci-of-aspeed test. Nevertheless, I
included these tests cases for completeness. Please see my discussion
with Arnd for more context[1].

NOTE: Arnd did the legwork for most of these patches, but did not
actually share code for some of them, so I left his Signed-off-by off of
those patches as I don't want to misrepresent him. Arnd, please sign off
on those patches at your soonest convenience.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/CAFd5g44udqkDiYBWh+VeDVJ=ELXeoXwunjv0f9frEN6HJODZng@mail.gmail.com/

Arnd Bergmann (1):
  bitfield: build kunit tests without structleak plugin

Brendan Higgins (5):
  gcc-plugins/structleak: add makefile var for disabling structleak
  iio/test-format: build kunit tests without structleak plugin
  device property: build kunit tests without structleak plugin
  thunderbolt: build kunit tests without structleak plugin
  mmc: sdhci-of-aspeed: build kunit tests without structleak plugin

 drivers/base/test/Makefile   | 2 +-
 drivers/iio/test/Makefile    | 1 +
 drivers/mmc/host/Makefile    | 1 +
 drivers/thunderbolt/Makefile | 1 +
 lib/Makefile                 | 2 +-
 scripts/Makefile.gcc-plugins | 4 ++++
 6 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)


base-commit: 316346243be6df12799c0b64b788e06bad97c30b
-- 
2.33.0.464.g1972c5931b-goog


             reply	other threads:[~2021-09-17  6:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-17  6:10 Brendan Higgins [this message]
2021-09-17  6:10 ` [PATCH v1 1/6] gcc-plugins/structleak: add makefile var for disabling structleak Brendan Higgins
2021-09-17 15:48   ` Kees Cook
2021-09-29 20:25     ` Brendan Higgins
2021-09-17  6:11 ` [PATCH v1 2/6] iio/test-format: build kunit tests without structleak plugin Brendan Higgins
2021-09-17 15:54   ` Kees Cook
2021-09-29 20:50     ` Brendan Higgins
2021-09-18 15:58   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-09-17  6:11 ` [PATCH v1 3/6] device property: " Brendan Higgins
2021-09-17 15:54   ` Kees Cook
2021-09-17  6:11 ` [PATCH v1 4/6] thunderbolt: " Brendan Higgins
2021-09-17 10:16   ` Mika Westerberg
2021-09-17 15:55   ` Kees Cook
2021-09-17  6:11 ` [PATCH v1 5/6] mmc: sdhci-of-aspeed: " Brendan Higgins
2021-09-17 15:56   ` Kees Cook
2021-09-17 18:40     ` Linus Torvalds
2021-09-29 20:59       ` Brendan Higgins
2021-09-17  6:11 ` [PATCH v1 6/6] bitfield: " Brendan Higgins
2021-09-17  7:22   ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-09-17 15:57     ` Kees Cook
2021-09-29 21:04     ` Brendan Higgins
2021-09-17  7:38 ` [PATCH v1 0/6] kunit: " Arnd Bergmann
2021-09-29 20:46   ` Brendan Higgins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210917061104.2680133-1-brendanhiggins@google.com \
    --to=brendanhiggins@google.com \
    --cc=YehezkelShB@gmail.com \
    --cc=andreas.noever@gmail.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=davidgow@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=michael.jamet@intel.com \
    --cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] kunit: build kunit tests without structleak plugin' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).