LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com>
To: Konstantin Komarov <almaz.alexandrovich@paragon-software.com>
Cc: ntfs3@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] fs/ntfs3: Remove locked argument in ntfs_set_ea
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 22:10:05 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210927191005.zcebctlxfsqutgkh@kari-VirtualBox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <816442f2-a79f-68cf-f107-9770a66f3acc@paragon-software.com>

On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 06:10:00PM +0300, Konstantin Komarov wrote:
> 
> 
> On 25.09.2021 11:49, Kari Argillander wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 07:15:50PM +0300, Konstantin Komarov wrote:
> >> We always need to lock now, because locks became smaller
> >> (see "Move ni_lock_dir and ni_unlock into ntfs_create_inode").
> > 
> > So basically this actually fixes that commit?
> > 
> > Fixes: d562e901f25d ("fs/ntfs3: Move ni_lock_dir and ni_unlock into ntfs_create_inode")
> > 
> > Or if you do not use fixes atleast use
> > 
> > d562e901f25d ("fs/ntfs3: Move ni_lock_dir and ni_unlock into ntfs_create_inode")
> > 
> > You can add these to your gitconfig
> > 
> > 	[core]
> > 		abbrev = 12
> > 	[pretty]
> > 	        fixes = Fixes: %h (\"%s\")
> > 		fixed = Fixes: %h (\"%s\")
> > 
> > And get this annotation with
> > 	git show --pretty=fixes <sha>
> > 
> > Have some comments below also.
> > 
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Komarov <almaz.alexandrovich@paragon-software.com>
> >> ---
> >>  fs/ntfs3/xattr.c | 28 +++++++++++++---------------
> >>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/fs/ntfs3/xattr.c b/fs/ntfs3/xattr.c
> >> index 253a07d9aa7b..1ab109723b10 100644
> >> --- a/fs/ntfs3/xattr.c
> >> +++ b/fs/ntfs3/xattr.c
> >> @@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ static int ntfs_get_ea(struct inode *inode, const char *name, size_t name_len,
> >>  
> >>  static noinline int ntfs_set_ea(struct inode *inode, const char *name,
> >>  				size_t name_len, const void *value,
> >> -				size_t val_size, int flags, int locked)

Maybe we should leave int locked and ...

> >> +				size_t val_size, int flags)
> >>  {
> >>  	struct ntfs_inode *ni = ntfs_i(inode);
> >>  	struct ntfs_sb_info *sbi = ni->mi.sbi;
> >> @@ -276,8 +276,7 @@ static noinline int ntfs_set_ea(struct inode *inode, const char *name,
> >>  	u64 new_sz;
> >>  	void *p;
> >>  
> >> -	if (!locked)
> >> -		ni_lock(ni);
> >> +	ni_lock(ni);
> >>  
> >>  	run_init(&ea_run);
> >>  
> >> @@ -465,8 +464,7 @@ static noinline int ntfs_set_ea(struct inode *inode, const char *name,
> >>  	mark_inode_dirty(&ni->vfs_inode);
> >>  
> >>  out:
> >> -	if (!locked)
> >> -		ni_unlock(ni);
> >> +	ni_unlock(ni);
> >>  
> >>  	run_close(&ea_run);
> >>  	kfree(ea_all);
> >> @@ -537,7 +535,7 @@ struct posix_acl *ntfs_get_acl(struct inode *inode, int type)
> >>  
> >>  static noinline int ntfs_set_acl_ex(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns,
> >>  				    struct inode *inode, struct posix_acl *acl,
> >> -				    int type, int locked)
> >> +				    int type)
> >>  {
> >>  	const char *name;
> >>  	size_t size, name_len;
> >> @@ -594,7 +592,7 @@ static noinline int ntfs_set_acl_ex(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns,
> >>  		flags = 0;
> >>  	}
> >>  
> >> -	err = ntfs_set_ea(inode, name, name_len, value, size, flags, locked);
> >> +	err = ntfs_set_ea(inode, name, name_len, value, size, flags);
> >>  	if (err == -ENODATA && !size)
> >>  		err = 0; /* Removing non existed xattr. */
> >>  	if (!err)
> >> @@ -612,7 +610,7 @@ static noinline int ntfs_set_acl_ex(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns,
> >>  int ntfs_set_acl(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, struct inode *inode,
> >>  		 struct posix_acl *acl, int type)
> >>  {
> >> -	return ntfs_set_acl_ex(mnt_userns, inode, acl, type, 0);
> >> +	return ntfs_set_acl_ex(mnt_userns, inode, acl, type);
> >>  }
> >>  
> >>  static int ntfs_xattr_get_acl(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns,
> >> @@ -693,7 +691,7 @@ int ntfs_init_acl(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, struct inode *inode,
> >>  
> >>  	if (default_acl) {
> >>  		err = ntfs_set_acl_ex(mnt_userns, inode, default_acl,
> >> -				      ACL_TYPE_DEFAULT, 1);
> >> +				      ACL_TYPE_DEFAULT);
> >>  		posix_acl_release(default_acl);
> >>  	} else {
> >>  		inode->i_default_acl = NULL;
> >> @@ -704,7 +702,7 @@ int ntfs_init_acl(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, struct inode *inode,
> >>  	else {
> >>  		if (!err)
> >>  			err = ntfs_set_acl_ex(mnt_userns, inode, acl,
> >> -					      ACL_TYPE_ACCESS, 1);
> >> +					      ACL_TYPE_ACCESS);
> >>  		posix_acl_release(acl);
> >>  	}
> >>  
> >> @@ -988,7 +986,7 @@ static noinline int ntfs_setxattr(const struct xattr_handler *handler,
> >>  	}
> >>  #endif
> >>  	/* Deal with NTFS extended attribute. */
> >> -	err = ntfs_set_ea(inode, name, name_len, value, size, flags, 0);
> >> +	err = ntfs_set_ea(inode, name, name_len, value, size, flags);
> >>  
> >>  out:
> >>  	return err;
> >> @@ -1006,26 +1004,26 @@ int ntfs_save_wsl_perm(struct inode *inode)
> >>  

do lock here and ...

> >>  	value = cpu_to_le32(i_uid_read(inode));
> >>  	err = ntfs_set_ea(inode, "$LXUID", sizeof("$LXUID") - 1, &value,
> >> -			  sizeof(value), 0, 0);
> >> +			  sizeof(value), 0);
> >>  	if (err)
> >>  		goto out;
> >>  
> >>  	value = cpu_to_le32(i_gid_read(inode));
> >>  	err = ntfs_set_ea(inode, "$LXGID", sizeof("$LXGID") - 1, &value,
> >> -			  sizeof(value), 0, 0);
> >> +			  sizeof(value), 0);
> >>  	if (err)
> >>  		goto out;
> >>  
> >>  	value = cpu_to_le32(inode->i_mode);
> >>  	err = ntfs_set_ea(inode, "$LXMOD", sizeof("$LXMOD") - 1, &value,
> >> -			  sizeof(value), 0, 0);
> >> +			  sizeof(value), 0);
> >>  	if (err)
> >>  		goto out;
> >>  
> >>  	if (S_ISCHR(inode->i_mode) || S_ISBLK(inode->i_mode)) {
> >>  		value = cpu_to_le32(inode->i_rdev);
> >>  		err = ntfs_set_ea(inode, "$LXDEV", sizeof("$LXDEV") - 1, &value,
> >> -				  sizeof(value), 0, 0);
> >> +				  sizeof(value), 0);

unlock here. Of course unlock also in error path.

> > 
> > Is this really that we can lock/unlock same lock 4 times in a row in a
> > ntfs_set_ea? This does not feel correct. 
> > 
> >   Argillander
> > 
> 
> How it was working before d562e901f25d 
> "fs/ntfs3: Move ni_lock_dir and ni_unlock into ntfs_create_inode":
> 
> ntfs_create (lock mutex) =>
> ntfs_create_inode =>
> ntfs_save_wsl_perm (we are under lock here) =>
> return to ntfs_create and unlock
> 
> How it works with d562e901f25d:
> 
> ntfs_create => 
> ntfs_create_inode (lock in line 1201 file fs/ntfs3/inode.c 
> and unlock in line 1557) => 
> ntfs_save_wsl_perm (we aren't under lock here in line 1605)
> 
> So we need to lock 4 times because there are 4 ntfs_set_ea calls.
> But now there can be done more work between those calls
> in other threads, locks became more granular.

Yeah but locking and locking 4 times when we can do it just ones is
quite waste. Please consider my suggestion above or tell what is wrong
with it. 

  Argillander

> 
> >>  		if (err)
> >>  			goto out;
> >>  	}
> >> -- 
> >> 2.33.0
> >>
> >>

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-27 19:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-24 16:13 [PATCH 0/3] fs/ntfs3: Refactoring of xattr.c Konstantin Komarov
2021-09-24 16:14 ` [PATCH 1/3] fs/ntfs3: Use available posix_acl_release instead of ntfs_posix_acl_release Konstantin Komarov
2021-09-25  8:50   ` Kari Argillander
2021-09-24 16:15 ` [PATCH 2/3] fs/ntfs3: Remove locked argument in ntfs_set_ea Konstantin Komarov
2021-09-25  8:49   ` Kari Argillander
2021-09-27 15:10     ` Konstantin Komarov
2021-09-27 19:10       ` Kari Argillander [this message]
2021-09-28 18:01         ` Konstantin Komarov
2021-09-28 18:13           ` Kari Argillander
2021-09-24 16:16 ` [PATCH 3/3] fs/ntfs3: Refactoring of ntfs_set_ea Konstantin Komarov
2021-09-24 16:31   ` Joe Perches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210927191005.zcebctlxfsqutgkh@kari-VirtualBox \
    --to=kari.argillander@gmail.com \
    --cc=almaz.alexandrovich@paragon-software.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ntfs3@lists.linux.dev \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 2/3] fs/ntfs3: Remove locked argument in ntfs_set_ea' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).