LKML Archive on
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gerald Schaefer <>
To: Vlastimil Babka <>
Cc: Faiyaz Mohammed <>,
	linux-mm <>,
	LKML <>,
	linux-s390 <>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <>,
	Andrew Morton <>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] mm/slub: fix endless "No data" printing for alloc/free_traces attribute
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 20:59:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211119205943.1ee5da0d@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 11:41:38 +0100
Vlastimil Babka <> wrote:

> On 11/17/21 20:39, Gerald Schaefer wrote:
> > Reading from alloc/free_traces attribute in /sys/kernel/debug/slab/ results
> > in an endless sequence of "No data". This is because slab_debugfs_start()
> > does not check for a "past end of file" condition and return NULL.
> I still have no idea how that endless sequence happens.
> To get it, we would have to call slab_debugfs_show() repeatedly with such v
> that *v == 0. Which should only happen with slab_debugfs_start() with *ppos
> == 0. Which your patch won't change because you add a '*ppos > t->count'
> condition, so *ppos has to be at least 1 to trigger this.

Yes, very strange. After a closer look to fs/seq_file.c, especially
seq_read_iter(), it seems that op->next will only be called when m->count == 0,
at least in the first while(1) loop. Printing "No data\n" sets m->count
to 8, so it will continue after Fill:, then call op->next, which returns NULL
and breaks the second while(1) loop, and also calls op->stop. Then it returns
from seq_read_iter(), only to be called again, and again, ...

Only when op->start returns NULL it will end it for good, probably
because seq_read_iter() will then return 0 instead of 8. Not sure if
there is a better way to fix this than by adding a second "return NULL"
to op->start, which feels a bit awkward and makes you wonder why the
"return NULL" from op->next is not enough.

> But yeah, AFAIK we should detect this in slab_debugfs_start() anyway.
> But I think the condition should be something like below, because we are
> past end of file already with *ppos == t->count. But if both are 0, we want
> to proceed for the "No data" output.

Ah ok, I wasn't sure about the "t->count > 0" case, i.e. if the check for
"*ppos > t->count" would still be correct there. So apparently it wouldn't,
and we need two checks, like you suggested

> // to show the No data
> if (!*ppos && !t->count)
> 	return ppos;
> if (*ppos >= t->count)
> 	return ppos;

That should be return NULL here, right?

> return ppos;

Will send a new patch, unless I find a better way after investigating the
endless seq_read_iter() calls mentioned above.
Is there an easy way to test the "t->count > 0" case, i.e. what would need
to be done to get some other reply than "No data"?

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-19 20:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-17 19:39 [RFC PATCH 0/1] mm/slub: " Gerald Schaefer
2021-11-17 19:39 ` [RFC PATCH 1/1] mm/slub: fix " Gerald Schaefer
2021-11-19 10:41   ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-11-19 19:59     ` Gerald Schaefer [this message]
2021-11-22 15:02       ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-11-22 20:14         ` Gerald Schaefer
2021-11-22 20:33           ` Gerald Schaefer
2021-11-23 14:19             ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-11-25 16:13               ` Gerald Schaefer
2021-11-25 20:12                 ` Gerald Schaefer
2021-11-25 22:00                   ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-11-26 17:11                     ` Gerald Schaefer
2021-11-26 17:18                     ` [PATCH] mm/slub: fix endianness bug for alloc/free_traces attributes Gerald Schaefer
2021-11-29 14:26                       ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-11-19  9:43 ` [RFC PATCH 0/1] mm/slub: endless "No data" printing for alloc/free_traces attribute Vlastimil Babka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211119205943.1ee5da0d@thinkpad \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] mm/slub: fix endless "No data" printing for alloc/free_traces attribute' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).