LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
x86@kernel.org, joao@overdrivepizza.com, hjl.tools@gmail.com,
andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ndesaulniers@google.com, samitolvanen@google.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/6] objtool: Add IBT validation / fixups
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 12:41:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220209114141.GN23216@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202202081542.F685EC23@keescook>
On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 03:43:27PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 11:30:37AM -0800, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 06:03:07PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > +static int validate_ibt_reloc(struct objtool_file *file, struct reloc *reloc, char **name)
> > > +{
> > > + struct instruction *dest;
> > > + struct section *sec;
> > > + unsigned long off;
> > > +
> > > + sec = reloc->sym->sec;
> > > + off = reloc->sym->offset + reloc->addend;
> > > +
> > > + dest = find_insn(file, sec, off);
> > > + if (!dest)
> > > + return 0;
> > > +
> > > + if (name && dest->func)
> > > + *name = dest->func->name;
> >
> > I think these checks can be further narrowed down by only looking for
> > X86_64_64 relocs.
> >
> > > + list_for_each_entry(insn, &file->endbr_list, call_node) {
> > > + if (ibt_seal) {
> > > + elf_write_insn(file->elf, insn->sec,
> > > + insn->offset, insn->len,
> > > + arch_nop_insn(insn->len));
> > > + }
> >
> > Like the retpoline rewriting, I'd much rather have objtool create
> > annotations which the kernel can then read and patch itself.
> >
> > e.g. have '.ibt.direct_call_sites' and '.ibt.unused_endbr_insns'
> > sections.
>
> Why have the kernel do that work at every boot when it can be known at
> link time?
I have patches that write a 4 byte #UD there instead of a nop. That
would make !IBT hardware splat as well when it hits a sealed function
(and in that case actually having those extra ENDBR generated is a
bonus).
Anyway, I have some newer patches and some hardware, except it's a NUC
and working with those things is a royal pain in the arse since they
don't have serial. I finally did get XHCI debug port working, but
there's no XDBC grub support, so now I managed to boot a dead kernel and
the thing is a brick until I can be arsed to connect a keybaord and
screen to it again :-(
KVM/qemu has no IBT support merged yet, so I can't use that either.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-09 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-22 17:03 [RFC][PATCH 0/6] x86: Kernel IBT beginnings Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-22 17:03 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/6] x86: Annotate _THIS_IP_ Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-23 13:53 ` Mark Rutland
2021-11-23 14:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-24 18:18 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-11-22 17:03 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/6] x86: Base IBT bits Peter Zijlstra
2022-02-08 23:32 ` Kees Cook
2021-11-22 17:03 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/6] x86: Add ENDBR to IRET-to-Self Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-22 18:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-02-08 23:33 ` Kees Cook
2021-11-22 17:03 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/6] objtool: Read the _THIS_IP_ hints Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-22 17:03 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/6] x86: Sprinkle ENDBR dust Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-23 14:00 ` Mark Rutland
2021-11-23 14:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-02-08 23:38 ` Kees Cook
2021-11-22 17:03 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/6] objtool: Add IBT validation / fixups Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-24 19:30 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-02-08 23:43 ` Kees Cook
2022-02-09 5:09 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-02-09 11:41 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2022-02-09 11:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-24 2:05 ` joao
2022-02-08 23:42 ` Kees Cook
2022-02-09 2:21 ` Joao Moreira
2022-02-09 4:05 ` Kees Cook
2022-02-09 5:18 ` Joao Moreira
2022-02-11 13:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-02-14 21:38 ` Sami Tolvanen
2022-02-14 22:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-02-15 16:56 ` Sami Tolvanen
2022-02-15 20:03 ` Kees Cook
2022-02-15 21:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-02-15 23:05 ` Kees Cook
2022-02-15 23:38 ` Joao Moreira
2022-02-16 12:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-02-15 20:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-02-15 22:45 ` Joao Moreira
2022-02-16 0:57 ` Andrew Cooper
2022-03-02 3:06 ` Peter Collingbourne
2022-03-02 3:32 ` Joao Moreira
2022-06-08 17:53 ` Fāng-ruì Sòng
2022-06-09 0:05 ` Sami Tolvanen
2021-11-23 7:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/6] x86: Kernel IBT beginnings Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-23 9:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-02-08 23:48 ` Kees Cook
2022-02-09 0:09 ` Nick Desaulniers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220209114141.GN23216@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=joao@overdrivepizza.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--subject='Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/6] objtool: Add IBT validation / fixups' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).