LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] of/platform: Support dynamic device tree on AMBA bus
@ 2018-10-25 16:39 Jaewon Kim
  2018-10-30 23:04 ` Frank Rowand
  2018-10-31 18:31 ` Rob Herring
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jaewon Kim @ 2018-10-25 16:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rob Herring, Frank Rowand, Jaewon Kim; +Cc: devicetree, linux-kernel

This patch supports dynamic device-tree for AMBA device.
The AMBA device must be registered on the AMBA bus, not the platform bus.

Signed-off-by: Jaewon Kim <jaewon02.kim@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/of/platform.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c
index 04ad312..b9ac105 100644
--- a/drivers/of/platform.c
+++ b/drivers/of/platform.c
@@ -286,6 +286,22 @@ static struct amba_device *of_amba_device_create(struct device_node *node,
 	of_node_clear_flag(node, OF_POPULATED);
 	return NULL;
 }
+
+/**
+ * of_find_amba_device_by_node - Find the amba_device associated with a node
+ * @np: Pointer to device tree node
+ *
+ * Returns amba_device pointer, or NULL if not found
+ */
+struct amba_device *of_find_amba_device_by_node(struct device_node *np)
+{
+	struct device *dev;
+
+	dev = bus_find_device(&amba_bustype, NULL, np, of_dev_node_match);
+	return dev ? to_amba_device(dev) : NULL;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_find_amba_device_by_node);
+
 #else /* CONFIG_ARM_AMBA */
 static struct amba_device *of_amba_device_create(struct device_node *node,
 						 const char *bus_id,
@@ -294,6 +310,12 @@ static struct amba_device *of_amba_device_create(struct device_node *node,
 {
 	return NULL;
 }
+
+struct amba_device *of_find_amba_device_by_node(struct device_node *np)
+{
+	return NULL;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_find_amba_device_by_node);
 #endif /* CONFIG_ARM_AMBA */
 
 /**
@@ -665,6 +687,7 @@ static int of_platform_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
 {
 	struct of_reconfig_data *rd = arg;
 	struct platform_device *pdev_parent, *pdev;
+	struct amba_device *adev_p, *adev;
 	bool children_left;
 
 	switch (of_reconfig_get_state_change(action, rd)) {
@@ -677,17 +700,34 @@ static int of_platform_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
 		if (of_node_check_flag(rd->dn, OF_POPULATED))
 			return NOTIFY_OK;
 
-		/* pdev_parent may be NULL when no bus platform device */
-		pdev_parent = of_find_device_by_node(rd->dn->parent);
-		pdev = of_platform_device_create(rd->dn, NULL,
-				pdev_parent ? &pdev_parent->dev : NULL);
-		of_dev_put(pdev_parent);
-
-		if (pdev == NULL) {
-			pr_err("%s: failed to create for '%pOF'\n",
-					__func__, rd->dn);
-			/* of_platform_device_create tosses the error code */
-			return notifier_from_errno(-EINVAL);
+		if (of_device_is_compatible(rd->dn, "arm,primecell")) {
+			/* adev_p may be NULL when no bus amba device */
+			adev_p = of_find_amba_device_by_node(rd->dn->parent);
+			adev = of_amba_device_create(rd->dn, NULL, NULL,
+					adev_p ? &adev_p->dev : NULL);
+
+			if (adev_p)
+				put_device(&adev_p->dev);
+
+			if (adev == NULL) {
+				pr_err("%s: failed to create for '%s'\n",
+						__func__, rd->dn->full_name);
+				/* of_amba_device_create tosses the error */
+				return notifier_from_errno(-EINVAL);
+			}
+		} else {
+			/* pdev_parent may be NULL when no bus platform device*/
+			pdev_parent = of_find_device_by_node(rd->dn->parent);
+			pdev = of_platform_device_create(rd->dn, NULL,
+					pdev_parent ? &pdev_parent->dev : NULL);
+			of_dev_put(pdev_parent);
+
+			if (pdev == NULL) {
+				pr_err("%s: failed to create for '%pOF'\n",
+						__func__, rd->dn);
+				/* of_platform_device_create tosses the error */
+				return notifier_from_errno(-EINVAL);
+			}
 		}
 		break;
 
@@ -698,15 +738,28 @@ static int of_platform_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
 			return NOTIFY_OK;
 
 		/* find our device by node */
-		pdev = of_find_device_by_node(rd->dn);
-		if (pdev == NULL)
-			return NOTIFY_OK;	/* no? not meant for us */
-
-		/* unregister takes one ref away */
-		of_platform_device_destroy(&pdev->dev, &children_left);
-
-		/* and put the reference of the find */
-		of_dev_put(pdev);
+		if (of_device_is_compatible(rd->dn, "arm,primecell")) {
+			adev = of_find_amba_device_by_node(rd->dn);
+			if (adev == NULL)
+				return NOTIFY_OK; /* no? not meant for us */
+
+			/* unregister takes one ref away */
+			of_platform_device_destroy(&adev->dev, &children_left);
+
+			/* and put the reference of the find */
+			if (adev)
+				put_device(&adev->dev);
+		} else {
+			pdev = of_find_device_by_node(rd->dn);
+			if (pdev == NULL)
+				return NOTIFY_OK; /* no? not meant for us */
+
+			/* unregister takes one ref away */
+			of_platform_device_destroy(&pdev->dev, &children_left);
+
+			/* and put the reference of the find */
+			of_dev_put(pdev);
+		}
 		break;
 	}
 
-- 
2.7.4


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] of/platform: Support dynamic device tree on AMBA bus
  2018-10-25 16:39 [PATCH] of/platform: Support dynamic device tree on AMBA bus Jaewon Kim
@ 2018-10-30 23:04 ` Frank Rowand
  2018-10-31 15:32   ` Jaewon Kim
  2018-10-31 18:31 ` Rob Herring
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Frank Rowand @ 2018-10-30 23:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jaewon Kim, Rob Herring, Jaewon Kim; +Cc: devicetree, linux-kernel

Hi Jaewon,

On 10/25/18 9:39 AM, Jaewon Kim wrote:
> This patch supports dynamic device-tree for AMBA device.

Add AMBA devices and buses to of_platform_notify() so that dynamic device-tree
will support AMBA.

> The AMBA device must be registered on the AMBA bus, not the platform bus.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jaewon Kim <jaewon02.kim@samsung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/of/platform.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c
> index 04ad312..b9ac105 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/platform.c
> @@ -286,6 +286,22 @@ static struct amba_device *of_amba_device_create(struct device_node *node,
>  	of_node_clear_flag(node, OF_POPULATED);
>  	return NULL;
>  }
> +
> +/**
> + * of_find_amba_device_by_node - Find the amba_device associated with a node
> + * @np: Pointer to device tree node
> + *
> + * Returns amba_device pointer, or NULL if not found
> + */
> +struct amba_device *of_find_amba_device_by_node(struct device_node *np)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev;
> +
> +	dev = bus_find_device(&amba_bustype, NULL, np, of_dev_node_match);
> +	return dev ? to_amba_device(dev) : NULL;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_find_amba_device_by_node);
> +
>  #else /* CONFIG_ARM_AMBA */
>  static struct amba_device *of_amba_device_create(struct device_node *node,
>  						 const char *bus_id,
> @@ -294,6 +310,12 @@ static struct amba_device *of_amba_device_create(struct device_node *node,
>  {
>  	return NULL;
>  }
> +
> +struct amba_device *of_find_amba_device_by_node(struct device_node *np)
> +{
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_find_amba_device_by_node);
>  #endif /* CONFIG_ARM_AMBA */
>  
>  /**
> @@ -665,6 +687,7 @@ static int of_platform_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
>  {
>  	struct of_reconfig_data *rd = arg;
>  	struct platform_device *pdev_parent, *pdev;
> +	struct amba_device *adev_p, *adev;
>  	bool children_left;
>  
>  	switch (of_reconfig_get_state_change(action, rd)) {
> @@ -677,17 +700,34 @@ static int of_platform_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
>  		if (of_node_check_flag(rd->dn, OF_POPULATED))
>  			return NOTIFY_OK;
>  
> -		/* pdev_parent may be NULL when no bus platform device */
> -		pdev_parent = of_find_device_by_node(rd->dn->parent);
> -		pdev = of_platform_device_create(rd->dn, NULL,
> -				pdev_parent ? &pdev_parent->dev : NULL);
> -		of_dev_put(pdev_parent);
> -
> -		if (pdev == NULL) {
> -			pr_err("%s: failed to create for '%pOF'\n",
> -					__func__, rd->dn);
> -			/* of_platform_device_create tosses the error code */
> -			return notifier_from_errno(-EINVAL);
> +		if (of_device_is_compatible(rd->dn, "arm,primecell")) {
> +			/* adev_p may be NULL when no bus amba device */
> +			adev_p = of_find_amba_device_by_node(rd->dn->parent);
> +			adev = of_amba_device_create(rd->dn, NULL, NULL,
> +					adev_p ? &adev_p->dev : NULL);
> +

> +			if (adev_p)
> +				put_device(&adev_p->dev);

Please follow the same model as of_dev_put() here, create a new function
of_amba_dev_put() to implement these two lines.


> +
> +			if (adev == NULL) {
> +				pr_err("%s: failed to create for '%s'\n",
> +						__func__, rd->dn->full_name);
> +				/* of_amba_device_create tosses the error */
> +				return notifier_from_errno(-EINVAL);
> +			}
> +		} else {
> +			/* pdev_parent may be NULL when no bus platform device*/
> +			pdev_parent = of_find_device_by_node(rd->dn->parent);
> +			pdev = of_platform_device_create(rd->dn, NULL,
> +					pdev_parent ? &pdev_parent->dev : NULL);
> +			of_dev_put(pdev_parent);
> +
> +			if (pdev == NULL) {
> +				pr_err("%s: failed to create for '%pOF'\n",
> +						__func__, rd->dn);
> +				/* of_platform_device_create tosses the error */
> +				return notifier_from_errno(-EINVAL);
> +			}
>  		}
>  		break;
>  
> @@ -698,15 +738,28 @@ static int of_platform_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
>  			return NOTIFY_OK;
>  
>  		/* find our device by node */
> -		pdev = of_find_device_by_node(rd->dn);
> -		if (pdev == NULL)
> -			return NOTIFY_OK;	/* no? not meant for us */
> -
> -		/* unregister takes one ref away */
> -		of_platform_device_destroy(&pdev->dev, &children_left);
> -
> -		/* and put the reference of the find */
> -		of_dev_put(pdev);
> +		if (of_device_is_compatible(rd->dn, "arm,primecell")) {
> +			adev = of_find_amba_device_by_node(rd->dn);
> +			if (adev == NULL)
> +				return NOTIFY_OK; /* no? not meant for us */
> +
> +			/* unregister takes one ref away */
> +			of_platform_device_destroy(&adev->dev, &children_left);
> +
> +			/* and put the reference of the find */

> +			if (adev)
> +				put_device(&adev->dev);

of_amba_dev_put() here also

-Frank


> +		} else {
> +			pdev = of_find_device_by_node(rd->dn);
> +			if (pdev == NULL)
> +				return NOTIFY_OK; /* no? not meant for us */
> +
> +			/* unregister takes one ref away */
> +			of_platform_device_destroy(&pdev->dev, &children_left);
> +
> +			/* and put the reference of the find */
> +			of_dev_put(pdev);
> +		}
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] of/platform: Support dynamic device tree on AMBA bus
  2018-10-30 23:04 ` Frank Rowand
@ 2018-10-31 15:32   ` Jaewon Kim
  2018-10-31 16:06     ` Frank Rowand
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jaewon Kim @ 2018-10-31 15:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Frank Rowand, Rob Herring, Jaewon Kim; +Cc: devicetree, linux-kernel

Hi Frank,


Thanks to review my patch.

On 18. 10. 31. 오전 8:04, Frank Rowand wrote:
> Hi Jaewon,
>
> On 10/25/18 9:39 AM, Jaewon Kim wrote:
>> This patch supports dynamic device-tree for AMBA device.
> Add AMBA devices and buses to of_platform_notify() so that dynamic device-tree
> will support AMBA.

What is meaning of this comment?

I already adds AMBA to of_platform_notify().

>
>> The AMBA device must be registered on the AMBA bus, not the platform bus.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jaewon Kim <jaewon02.kim@samsung.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/of/platform.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>>   1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c
>> index 04ad312..b9ac105 100644
>> --- a/drivers/of/platform.c
>> +++ b/drivers/of/platform.c
>> @@ -286,6 +286,22 @@ static struct amba_device *of_amba_device_create(struct device_node *node,
>>   	of_node_clear_flag(node, OF_POPULATED);
>>   	return NULL;
>>   }
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * of_find_amba_device_by_node - Find the amba_device associated with a node
>> + * @np: Pointer to device tree node
>> + *
>> + * Returns amba_device pointer, or NULL if not found
>> + */
>> +struct amba_device *of_find_amba_device_by_node(struct device_node *np)
>> +{
>> +	struct device *dev;
>> +
>> +	dev = bus_find_device(&amba_bustype, NULL, np, of_dev_node_match);
>> +	return dev ? to_amba_device(dev) : NULL;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_find_amba_device_by_node);
>> +
>>   #else /* CONFIG_ARM_AMBA */
>>   static struct amba_device *of_amba_device_create(struct device_node *node,
>>   						 const char *bus_id,
>> @@ -294,6 +310,12 @@ static struct amba_device *of_amba_device_create(struct device_node *node,
>>   {
>>   	return NULL;
>>   }
>> +
>> +struct amba_device *of_find_amba_device_by_node(struct device_node *np)
>> +{
>> +	return NULL;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_find_amba_device_by_node);
>>   #endif /* CONFIG_ARM_AMBA */
>>   
>>   /**
>> @@ -665,6 +687,7 @@ static int of_platform_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
>>   {
>>   	struct of_reconfig_data *rd = arg;
>>   	struct platform_device *pdev_parent, *pdev;
>> +	struct amba_device *adev_p, *adev;
>>   	bool children_left;
>>   
>>   	switch (of_reconfig_get_state_change(action, rd)) {
>> @@ -677,17 +700,34 @@ static int of_platform_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
>>   		if (of_node_check_flag(rd->dn, OF_POPULATED))
>>   			return NOTIFY_OK;
>>   
>> -		/* pdev_parent may be NULL when no bus platform device */
>> -		pdev_parent = of_find_device_by_node(rd->dn->parent);
>> -		pdev = of_platform_device_create(rd->dn, NULL,
>> -				pdev_parent ? &pdev_parent->dev : NULL);
>> -		of_dev_put(pdev_parent);
>> -
>> -		if (pdev == NULL) {
>> -			pr_err("%s: failed to create for '%pOF'\n",
>> -					__func__, rd->dn);
>> -			/* of_platform_device_create tosses the error code */
>> -			return notifier_from_errno(-EINVAL);
>> +		if (of_device_is_compatible(rd->dn, "arm,primecell")) {
>> +			/* adev_p may be NULL when no bus amba device */
>> +			adev_p = of_find_amba_device_by_node(rd->dn->parent);
>> +			adev = of_amba_device_create(rd->dn, NULL, NULL,
>> +					adev_p ? &adev_p->dev : NULL);
>> +
>> +			if (adev_p)
>> +				put_device(&adev_p->dev);
> Please follow the same model as of_dev_put() here, create a new function
> of_amba_dev_put() to implement these two lines.
Okay, I will create of_amba_dev_put() function.
>
>
>> +
>> +			if (adev == NULL) {
>> +				pr_err("%s: failed to create for '%s'\n",
>> +						__func__, rd->dn->full_name);
>> +				/* of_amba_device_create tosses the error */
>> +				return notifier_from_errno(-EINVAL);
>> +			}
>> +		} else {
>> +			/* pdev_parent may be NULL when no bus platform device*/
>> +			pdev_parent = of_find_device_by_node(rd->dn->parent);
>> +			pdev = of_platform_device_create(rd->dn, NULL,
>> +					pdev_parent ? &pdev_parent->dev : NULL);
>> +			of_dev_put(pdev_parent);
>> +
>> +			if (pdev == NULL) {
>> +				pr_err("%s: failed to create for '%pOF'\n",
>> +						__func__, rd->dn);
>> +				/* of_platform_device_create tosses the error */
>> +				return notifier_from_errno(-EINVAL);
>> +			}
>>   		}
>>   		break;
>>   
>> @@ -698,15 +738,28 @@ static int of_platform_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
>>   			return NOTIFY_OK;
>>   
>>   		/* find our device by node */
>> -		pdev = of_find_device_by_node(rd->dn);
>> -		if (pdev == NULL)
>> -			return NOTIFY_OK;	/* no? not meant for us */
>> -
>> -		/* unregister takes one ref away */
>> -		of_platform_device_destroy(&pdev->dev, &children_left);
>> -
>> -		/* and put the reference of the find */
>> -		of_dev_put(pdev);
>> +		if (of_device_is_compatible(rd->dn, "arm,primecell")) {
>> +			adev = of_find_amba_device_by_node(rd->dn);
>> +			if (adev == NULL)
>> +				return NOTIFY_OK; /* no? not meant for us */
>> +
>> +			/* unregister takes one ref away */
>> +			of_platform_device_destroy(&adev->dev, &children_left);
>> +
>> +			/* and put the reference of the find */
>> +			if (adev)
>> +				put_device(&adev->dev);
> of_amba_dev_put() here also
>
> -Frank
Okay, I will create it.
>
>> +		} else {
>> +			pdev = of_find_device_by_node(rd->dn);
>> +			if (pdev == NULL)
>> +				return NOTIFY_OK; /* no? not meant for us */
>> +
>> +			/* unregister takes one ref away */
>> +			of_platform_device_destroy(&pdev->dev, &children_left);
>> +
>> +			/* and put the reference of the find */
>> +			of_dev_put(pdev);
>> +		}
>>   		break;
>>   	}
>>   
>>
Thanks

Jaewon Kim


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] of/platform: Support dynamic device tree on AMBA bus
  2018-10-31 15:32   ` Jaewon Kim
@ 2018-10-31 16:06     ` Frank Rowand
  2018-11-01 15:36       ` Jaewon Kim
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Frank Rowand @ 2018-10-31 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jaewon Kim, Rob Herring, Jaewon Kim; +Cc: devicetree, linux-kernel

On 10/31/18 8:32 AM, Jaewon Kim wrote:
> Hi Frank,
> 
> 
> Thanks to review my patch.
> 
> On 18. 10. 31. 오전 8:04, Frank Rowand wrote:
>> Hi Jaewon,
>>
>> On 10/25/18 9:39 AM, Jaewon Kim wrote:
>>> This patch supports dynamic device-tree for AMBA device.
>> Add AMBA devices and buses to of_platform_notify() so that dynamic device-tree
>> will support AMBA.
> 
> What is meaning of this comment?
> 
> I already adds AMBA to of_platform_notify().

I was trying to make the commit comment more explanatory.  (And finding it difficult
to remain brief, yet meaningful.)  The original patch header comment did not tell me
why the patch changes added support of dynamic devicetree on AMBA - I had to read the
patch before I understood what it did.  If you can think of better words than I
suggested, please come up with different wording.

My intent with this sentence was that more explanation needed to be added to the
comment, not that the code needed to change in any way other than what I noted
in-line inside the patch.  Does this make things more clear, or am I misunderstanding
your question?

-Frank


> 
>>
>>> The AMBA device must be registered on the AMBA bus, not the platform bus.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jaewon Kim <jaewon02.kim@samsung.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/of/platform.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>>>   1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c
>>> index 04ad312..b9ac105 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/of/platform.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/of/platform.c
>>> @@ -286,6 +286,22 @@ static struct amba_device *of_amba_device_create(struct device_node *node,
>>>       of_node_clear_flag(node, OF_POPULATED);
>>>       return NULL;
>>>   }
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> + * of_find_amba_device_by_node - Find the amba_device associated with a node
>>> + * @np: Pointer to device tree node
>>> + *
>>> + * Returns amba_device pointer, or NULL if not found
>>> + */
>>> +struct amba_device *of_find_amba_device_by_node(struct device_node *np)
>>> +{
>>> +    struct device *dev;
>>> +
>>> +    dev = bus_find_device(&amba_bustype, NULL, np, of_dev_node_match);
>>> +    return dev ? to_amba_device(dev) : NULL;
>>> +}
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_find_amba_device_by_node);
>>> +
>>>   #else /* CONFIG_ARM_AMBA */
>>>   static struct amba_device *of_amba_device_create(struct device_node *node,
>>>                            const char *bus_id,
>>> @@ -294,6 +310,12 @@ static struct amba_device *of_amba_device_create(struct device_node *node,
>>>   {
>>>       return NULL;
>>>   }
>>> +
>>> +struct amba_device *of_find_amba_device_by_node(struct device_node *np)
>>> +{
>>> +    return NULL;
>>> +}
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_find_amba_device_by_node);
>>>   #endif /* CONFIG_ARM_AMBA */
>>>     /**
>>> @@ -665,6 +687,7 @@ static int of_platform_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
>>>   {
>>>       struct of_reconfig_data *rd = arg;
>>>       struct platform_device *pdev_parent, *pdev;
>>> +    struct amba_device *adev_p, *adev;
>>>       bool children_left;
>>>         switch (of_reconfig_get_state_change(action, rd)) {
>>> @@ -677,17 +700,34 @@ static int of_platform_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
>>>           if (of_node_check_flag(rd->dn, OF_POPULATED))
>>>               return NOTIFY_OK;
>>>   -        /* pdev_parent may be NULL when no bus platform device */
>>> -        pdev_parent = of_find_device_by_node(rd->dn->parent);
>>> -        pdev = of_platform_device_create(rd->dn, NULL,
>>> -                pdev_parent ? &pdev_parent->dev : NULL);
>>> -        of_dev_put(pdev_parent);
>>> -
>>> -        if (pdev == NULL) {
>>> -            pr_err("%s: failed to create for '%pOF'\n",
>>> -                    __func__, rd->dn);
>>> -            /* of_platform_device_create tosses the error code */
>>> -            return notifier_from_errno(-EINVAL);
>>> +        if (of_device_is_compatible(rd->dn, "arm,primecell")) {
>>> +            /* adev_p may be NULL when no bus amba device */
>>> +            adev_p = of_find_amba_device_by_node(rd->dn->parent);
>>> +            adev = of_amba_device_create(rd->dn, NULL, NULL,
>>> +                    adev_p ? &adev_p->dev : NULL);
>>> +
>>> +            if (adev_p)
>>> +                put_device(&adev_p->dev);
>> Please follow the same model as of_dev_put() here, create a new function
>> of_amba_dev_put() to implement these two lines.
> Okay, I will create of_amba_dev_put() function.
>>
>>
>>> +
>>> +            if (adev == NULL) {
>>> +                pr_err("%s: failed to create for '%s'\n",
>>> +                        __func__, rd->dn->full_name);
>>> +                /* of_amba_device_create tosses the error */
>>> +                return notifier_from_errno(-EINVAL);
>>> +            }
>>> +        } else {
>>> +            /* pdev_parent may be NULL when no bus platform device*/
>>> +            pdev_parent = of_find_device_by_node(rd->dn->parent);
>>> +            pdev = of_platform_device_create(rd->dn, NULL,
>>> +                    pdev_parent ? &pdev_parent->dev : NULL);
>>> +            of_dev_put(pdev_parent);
>>> +
>>> +            if (pdev == NULL) {
>>> +                pr_err("%s: failed to create for '%pOF'\n",
>>> +                        __func__, rd->dn);
>>> +                /* of_platform_device_create tosses the error */
>>> +                return notifier_from_errno(-EINVAL);
>>> +            }
>>>           }
>>>           break;
>>>   @@ -698,15 +738,28 @@ static int of_platform_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
>>>               return NOTIFY_OK;
>>>             /* find our device by node */
>>> -        pdev = of_find_device_by_node(rd->dn);
>>> -        if (pdev == NULL)
>>> -            return NOTIFY_OK;    /* no? not meant for us */
>>> -
>>> -        /* unregister takes one ref away */
>>> -        of_platform_device_destroy(&pdev->dev, &children_left);
>>> -
>>> -        /* and put the reference of the find */
>>> -        of_dev_put(pdev);
>>> +        if (of_device_is_compatible(rd->dn, "arm,primecell")) {
>>> +            adev = of_find_amba_device_by_node(rd->dn);
>>> +            if (adev == NULL)
>>> +                return NOTIFY_OK; /* no? not meant for us */
>>> +
>>> +            /* unregister takes one ref away */
>>> +            of_platform_device_destroy(&adev->dev, &children_left);
>>> +
>>> +            /* and put the reference of the find */
>>> +            if (adev)
>>> +                put_device(&adev->dev);
>> of_amba_dev_put() here also
>>
>> -Frank
> Okay, I will create it.
>>
>>> +        } else {
>>> +            pdev = of_find_device_by_node(rd->dn);
>>> +            if (pdev == NULL)
>>> +                return NOTIFY_OK; /* no? not meant for us */
>>> +
>>> +            /* unregister takes one ref away */
>>> +            of_platform_device_destroy(&pdev->dev, &children_left);
>>> +
>>> +            /* and put the reference of the find */
>>> +            of_dev_put(pdev);
>>> +        }
>>>           break;
>>>       }
>>>  
> Thanks
> 
> Jaewon Kim
> 
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] of/platform: Support dynamic device tree on AMBA bus
  2018-10-25 16:39 [PATCH] of/platform: Support dynamic device tree on AMBA bus Jaewon Kim
  2018-10-30 23:04 ` Frank Rowand
@ 2018-10-31 18:31 ` Rob Herring
       [not found]   ` <1f7b35fd-7900-0c48-50a2-4f84481a208c@gmail.com>
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2018-10-31 18:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jaewon02.kim; +Cc: Frank Rowand, jaewon02.kim, devicetree, linux-kernel

On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 11:40 AM Jaewon Kim <jaewon02.kim@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This patch supports dynamic device-tree for AMBA device.
> The AMBA device must be registered on the AMBA bus, not the platform bus.

I'm not convinced we should even support this. There's a limited
number of AMBA devices. They would almost certainly be on-chip and
static. I suppose in theory you could have them in an FPGA, but
generally the FPGA vendors have their own IP blocks and don't use ARM
Primecell IP. So what is the usecase?

>
> Signed-off-by: Jaewon Kim <jaewon02.kim@samsung.com>

Your author and S-o-b emails should match.

> ---
>  drivers/of/platform.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c
> index 04ad312..b9ac105 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/platform.c
> @@ -286,6 +286,22 @@ static struct amba_device *of_amba_device_create(struct device_node *node,
>         of_node_clear_flag(node, OF_POPULATED);
>         return NULL;
>  }
> +
> +/**
> + * of_find_amba_device_by_node - Find the amba_device associated with a node
> + * @np: Pointer to device tree node
> + *
> + * Returns amba_device pointer, or NULL if not found
> + */
> +struct amba_device *of_find_amba_device_by_node(struct device_node *np)
> +{
> +       struct device *dev;
> +
> +       dev = bus_find_device(&amba_bustype, NULL, np, of_dev_node_match);
> +       return dev ? to_amba_device(dev) : NULL;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_find_amba_device_by_node);

I would prefer we add (or change the platform device version) an
of_find_device_by_node which can be extended to different bus types.

> +
>  #else /* CONFIG_ARM_AMBA */
>  static struct amba_device *of_amba_device_create(struct device_node *node,
>                                                  const char *bus_id,
> @@ -294,6 +310,12 @@ static struct amba_device *of_amba_device_create(struct device_node *node,
>  {
>         return NULL;
>  }
> +
> +struct amba_device *of_find_amba_device_by_node(struct device_node *np)
> +{
> +       return NULL;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_find_amba_device_by_node);
>  #endif /* CONFIG_ARM_AMBA */
>
>  /**
> @@ -665,6 +687,7 @@ static int of_platform_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
>  {
>         struct of_reconfig_data *rd = arg;
>         struct platform_device *pdev_parent, *pdev;
> +       struct amba_device *adev_p, *adev;
>         bool children_left;
>
>         switch (of_reconfig_get_state_change(action, rd)) {
> @@ -677,17 +700,34 @@ static int of_platform_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
>                 if (of_node_check_flag(rd->dn, OF_POPULATED))
>                         return NOTIFY_OK;
>
> -               /* pdev_parent may be NULL when no bus platform device */
> -               pdev_parent = of_find_device_by_node(rd->dn->parent);
> -               pdev = of_platform_device_create(rd->dn, NULL,
> -                               pdev_parent ? &pdev_parent->dev : NULL);
> -               of_dev_put(pdev_parent);
> -
> -               if (pdev == NULL) {
> -                       pr_err("%s: failed to create for '%pOF'\n",
> -                                       __func__, rd->dn);
> -                       /* of_platform_device_create tosses the error code */
> -                       return notifier_from_errno(-EINVAL);
> +               if (of_device_is_compatible(rd->dn, "arm,primecell")) {
> +                       /* adev_p may be NULL when no bus amba device */
> +                       adev_p = of_find_amba_device_by_node(rd->dn->parent);

An amba_device can't ever have a parent that's an amba_device. The
parent of an amba_device is typically a platform_device for a
'simple-bus'.

> +                       adev = of_amba_device_create(rd->dn, NULL, NULL,
> +                                       adev_p ? &adev_p->dev : NULL);
> +
> +                       if (adev_p)
> +                               put_device(&adev_p->dev);
> +
> +                       if (adev == NULL) {
> +                               pr_err("%s: failed to create for '%s'\n",
> +                                               __func__, rd->dn->full_name);
> +                               /* of_amba_device_create tosses the error */
> +                               return notifier_from_errno(-EINVAL);
> +                       }
> +               } else {
> +                       /* pdev_parent may be NULL when no bus platform device*/
> +                       pdev_parent = of_find_device_by_node(rd->dn->parent);
> +                       pdev = of_platform_device_create(rd->dn, NULL,
> +                                       pdev_parent ? &pdev_parent->dev : NULL);
> +                       of_dev_put(pdev_parent);
> +
> +                       if (pdev == NULL) {
> +                               pr_err("%s: failed to create for '%pOF'\n",
> +                                               __func__, rd->dn);
> +                               /* of_platform_device_create tosses the error */
> +                               return notifier_from_errno(-EINVAL);
> +                       }

This all pretty much duplicates what of_platform_bus_create() does and
we should use it here rather than have another copy. Plus what about
handling of any child devices (in the platform device case).

>                 }
>                 break;
>
> @@ -698,15 +738,28 @@ static int of_platform_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
>                         return NOTIFY_OK;
>
>                 /* find our device by node */
> -               pdev = of_find_device_by_node(rd->dn);
> -               if (pdev == NULL)
> -                       return NOTIFY_OK;       /* no? not meant for us */
> -
> -               /* unregister takes one ref away */
> -               of_platform_device_destroy(&pdev->dev, &children_left);
> -
> -               /* and put the reference of the find */
> -               of_dev_put(pdev);
> +               if (of_device_is_compatible(rd->dn, "arm,primecell")) {
> +                       adev = of_find_amba_device_by_node(rd->dn);

With the above suggested function returning a struct device for the
node, you can get rid of the if {} else {}.

> +                       if (adev == NULL)
> +                               return NOTIFY_OK; /* no? not meant for us */
> +
> +                       /* unregister takes one ref away */
> +                       of_platform_device_destroy(&adev->dev, &children_left);
> +
> +                       /* and put the reference of the find */
> +                       if (adev)
> +                               put_device(&adev->dev);
> +               } else {
> +                       pdev = of_find_device_by_node(rd->dn);
> +                       if (pdev == NULL)
> +                               return NOTIFY_OK; /* no? not meant for us */
> +
> +                       /* unregister takes one ref away */
> +                       of_platform_device_destroy(&pdev->dev, &children_left);
> +
> +                       /* and put the reference of the find */
> +                       of_dev_put(pdev);
> +               }
>                 break;
>         }
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] of/platform: Support dynamic device tree on AMBA bus
  2018-10-31 16:06     ` Frank Rowand
@ 2018-11-01 15:36       ` Jaewon Kim
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jaewon Kim @ 2018-11-01 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Frank Rowand, Rob Herring, Jaewon Kim; +Cc: Jaewon Kim, linux-kernel


On 11/1/18 1:06 AM, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 10/31/18 8:32 AM, Jaewon Kim wrote:
>> Hi Frank,
>>
>>
>> Thanks to review my patch.
>>
>> On 18. 10. 31. 오전 8:04, Frank Rowand wrote:
>>> Hi Jaewon,
>>>
>>> On 10/25/18 9:39 AM, Jaewon Kim wrote:
>>>> This patch supports dynamic device-tree for AMBA device.
>>> Add AMBA devices and buses to of_platform_notify() so that dynamic device-tree
>>> will support AMBA.
>> What is meaning of this comment?
>>
>> I already adds AMBA to of_platform_notify().
> I was trying to make the commit comment more explanatory.  (And finding it difficult
> to remain brief, yet meaningful.)  The original patch header comment did not tell me
> why the patch changes added support of dynamic devicetree on AMBA - I had to read the
> patch before I understood what it did.  If you can think of better words than I
> suggested, please come up with different wording.
>
> My intent with this sentence was that more explanation needed to be added to the
> comment, not that the code needed to change in any way other than what I noted
> in-line inside the patch.  Does this make things more clear, or am I misunderstanding
> your question?
>
> -Frank

Now I understand your intentions.

I will write more clear comment in the next patch version.


Thanks

Jaewon Kim

>
>
>>>> The AMBA device must be registered on the AMBA bus, not the platform bus.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jaewon Kim <jaewon02.kim@samsung.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    drivers/of/platform.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>>>>    1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c
>>>> index 04ad312..b9ac105 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/of/platform.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/of/platform.c
>>>> @@ -286,6 +286,22 @@ static struct amba_device *of_amba_device_create(struct device_node *node,
>>>>        of_node_clear_flag(node, OF_POPULATED);
>>>>        return NULL;
>>>>    }
>>>> +
>>>> +/**
>>>> + * of_find_amba_device_by_node - Find the amba_device associated with a node
>>>> + * @np: Pointer to device tree node
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Returns amba_device pointer, or NULL if not found
>>>> + */
>>>> +struct amba_device *of_find_amba_device_by_node(struct device_node *np)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    struct device *dev;
>>>> +
>>>> +    dev = bus_find_device(&amba_bustype, NULL, np, of_dev_node_match);
>>>> +    return dev ? to_amba_device(dev) : NULL;
>>>> +}
>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_find_amba_device_by_node);
>>>> +
>>>>    #else /* CONFIG_ARM_AMBA */
>>>>    static struct amba_device *of_amba_device_create(struct device_node *node,
>>>>                             const char *bus_id,
>>>> @@ -294,6 +310,12 @@ static struct amba_device *of_amba_device_create(struct device_node *node,
>>>>    {
>>>>        return NULL;
>>>>    }
>>>> +
>>>> +struct amba_device *of_find_amba_device_by_node(struct device_node *np)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    return NULL;
>>>> +}
>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_find_amba_device_by_node);
>>>>    #endif /* CONFIG_ARM_AMBA */
>>>>      /**
>>>> @@ -665,6 +687,7 @@ static int of_platform_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
>>>>    {
>>>>        struct of_reconfig_data *rd = arg;
>>>>        struct platform_device *pdev_parent, *pdev;
>>>> +    struct amba_device *adev_p, *adev;
>>>>        bool children_left;
>>>>          switch (of_reconfig_get_state_change(action, rd)) {
>>>> @@ -677,17 +700,34 @@ static int of_platform_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
>>>>            if (of_node_check_flag(rd->dn, OF_POPULATED))
>>>>                return NOTIFY_OK;
>>>>    -        /* pdev_parent may be NULL when no bus platform device */
>>>> -        pdev_parent = of_find_device_by_node(rd->dn->parent);
>>>> -        pdev = of_platform_device_create(rd->dn, NULL,
>>>> -                pdev_parent ? &pdev_parent->dev : NULL);
>>>> -        of_dev_put(pdev_parent);
>>>> -
>>>> -        if (pdev == NULL) {
>>>> -            pr_err("%s: failed to create for '%pOF'\n",
>>>> -                    __func__, rd->dn);
>>>> -            /* of_platform_device_create tosses the error code */
>>>> -            return notifier_from_errno(-EINVAL);
>>>> +        if (of_device_is_compatible(rd->dn, "arm,primecell")) {
>>>> +            /* adev_p may be NULL when no bus amba device */
>>>> +            adev_p = of_find_amba_device_by_node(rd->dn->parent);
>>>> +            adev = of_amba_device_create(rd->dn, NULL, NULL,
>>>> +                    adev_p ? &adev_p->dev : NULL);
>>>> +
>>>> +            if (adev_p)
>>>> +                put_device(&adev_p->dev);
>>> Please follow the same model as of_dev_put() here, create a new function
>>> of_amba_dev_put() to implement these two lines.
>> Okay, I will create of_amba_dev_put() function.
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> +            if (adev == NULL) {
>>>> +                pr_err("%s: failed to create for '%s'\n",
>>>> +                        __func__, rd->dn->full_name);
>>>> +                /* of_amba_device_create tosses the error */
>>>> +                return notifier_from_errno(-EINVAL);
>>>> +            }
>>>> +        } else {
>>>> +            /* pdev_parent may be NULL when no bus platform device*/
>>>> +            pdev_parent = of_find_device_by_node(rd->dn->parent);
>>>> +            pdev = of_platform_device_create(rd->dn, NULL,
>>>> +                    pdev_parent ? &pdev_parent->dev : NULL);
>>>> +            of_dev_put(pdev_parent);
>>>> +
>>>> +            if (pdev == NULL) {
>>>> +                pr_err("%s: failed to create for '%pOF'\n",
>>>> +                        __func__, rd->dn);
>>>> +                /* of_platform_device_create tosses the error */
>>>> +                return notifier_from_errno(-EINVAL);
>>>> +            }
>>>>            }
>>>>            break;
>>>>    @@ -698,15 +738,28 @@ static int of_platform_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
>>>>                return NOTIFY_OK;
>>>>              /* find our device by node */
>>>> -        pdev = of_find_device_by_node(rd->dn);
>>>> -        if (pdev == NULL)
>>>> -            return NOTIFY_OK;    /* no? not meant for us */
>>>> -
>>>> -        /* unregister takes one ref away */
>>>> -        of_platform_device_destroy(&pdev->dev, &children_left);
>>>> -
>>>> -        /* and put the reference of the find */
>>>> -        of_dev_put(pdev);
>>>> +        if (of_device_is_compatible(rd->dn, "arm,primecell")) {
>>>> +            adev = of_find_amba_device_by_node(rd->dn);
>>>> +            if (adev == NULL)
>>>> +                return NOTIFY_OK; /* no? not meant for us */
>>>> +
>>>> +            /* unregister takes one ref away */
>>>> +            of_platform_device_destroy(&adev->dev, &children_left);
>>>> +
>>>> +            /* and put the reference of the find */
>>>> +            if (adev)
>>>> +                put_device(&adev->dev);
>>> of_amba_dev_put() here also
>>>
>>> -Frank
>> Okay, I will create it.
>>>> +        } else {
>>>> +            pdev = of_find_device_by_node(rd->dn);
>>>> +            if (pdev == NULL)
>>>> +                return NOTIFY_OK; /* no? not meant for us */
>>>> +
>>>> +            /* unregister takes one ref away */
>>>> +            of_platform_device_destroy(&pdev->dev, &children_left);
>>>> +
>>>> +            /* and put the reference of the find */
>>>> +            of_dev_put(pdev);
>>>> +        }
>>>>            break;
>>>>        }
>>>>   
>> Thanks
>>
>> Jaewon Kim
>>
>>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] of/platform: Support dynamic device tree on AMBA bus
       [not found]   ` <1f7b35fd-7900-0c48-50a2-4f84481a208c@gmail.com>
@ 2018-11-06 13:11     ` Rob Herring
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2018-11-06 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jaewon Kim; +Cc: Frank Rowand, jaewon02.kim, devicetree, linux-kernel

On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 01:49:05AM +0900, Jaewon Kim wrote:
> Hi Rob,
> 
> On 11/1/18 3:31 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 11:40 AM Jaewon Kim <jaewon02.kim@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > This patch supports dynamic device-tree for AMBA device.
> > > The AMBA device must be registered on the AMBA bus, not the platform bus.
> > I'm not convinced we should even support this. There's a limited
> > number of AMBA devices. They would almost certainly be on-chip and
> > static. I suppose in theory you could have them in an FPGA, but
> > generally the FPGA vendors have their own IP blocks and don't use ARM
> > Primecell IP. So what is the usecase?
> 
> In my case, our target has GPIO output pin, like RPI board. And I want to
> use dt-overlay to change GPIO alternative function. But, I found that AMBA
> device not work with dt-overlay. Most AMBA devices do not require dynamic
> device-tree. But, pl022(serial) and pl011(SPI) needs dynamic device-tree.

The bootloader should apply the overlay.

> 
> > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Jaewon Kim <jaewon02.kim@samsung.com>
> > Your author and S-o-b emails should match.
> Okay, I will change it my gmail.
> > 
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/of/platform.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> > >   1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c
> > > index 04ad312..b9ac105 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/of/platform.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/of/platform.c
> > > @@ -286,6 +286,22 @@ static struct amba_device *of_amba_device_create(struct device_node *node,
> > >          of_node_clear_flag(node, OF_POPULATED);
> > >          return NULL;
> > >   }
> > > +
> > > +/**
> > > + * of_find_amba_device_by_node - Find the amba_device associated with a node
> > > + * @np: Pointer to device tree node
> > > + *
> > > + * Returns amba_device pointer, or NULL if not found
> > > + */
> > > +struct amba_device *of_find_amba_device_by_node(struct device_node *np)
> > > +{
> > > +       struct device *dev;
> > > +
> > > +       dev = bus_find_device(&amba_bustype, NULL, np, of_dev_node_match);
> > > +       return dev ? to_amba_device(dev) : NULL;
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_find_amba_device_by_node);
> > I would prefer we add (or change the platform device version) an
> > of_find_device_by_node which can be extended to different bus types.
> 
> The returned type is different. of_find_device_by_node () returns 'struct
> platform_device *', and of_find_amba_device_by_node() returns 'struct
> amba_device *'. To make this the same, It need to modify return value of
> of_find_device_by_node() function or merge amba_device to
> platform_device.of_find_device_by_node() function is a widely used kernel
> source and it requires a lot of modifications.I think it would be simpler to
> make of_find_amba_device_by_node().

You don't have to make treewide changes. Define a new function returning 
struct device. Make of_find_device_by_node() a wrapper that gets the 
platform_device from the struct device.

> 
> > 
> > > +
> > >   #else /* CONFIG_ARM_AMBA */
> > >   static struct amba_device *of_amba_device_create(struct device_node *node,
> > >                                                   const char *bus_id,
> > > @@ -294,6 +310,12 @@ static struct amba_device *of_amba_device_create(struct device_node *node,
> > >   {
> > >          return NULL;
> > >   }
> > > +
> > > +struct amba_device *of_find_amba_device_by_node(struct device_node *np)
> > > +{
> > > +       return NULL;
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_find_amba_device_by_node);
> > >   #endif /* CONFIG_ARM_AMBA */
> > > 
> > >   /**
> > > @@ -665,6 +687,7 @@ static int of_platform_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
> > >   {
> > >          struct of_reconfig_data *rd = arg;
> > >          struct platform_device *pdev_parent, *pdev;
> > > +       struct amba_device *adev_p, *adev;
> > >          bool children_left;
> > > 
> > >          switch (of_reconfig_get_state_change(action, rd)) {
> > > @@ -677,17 +700,34 @@ static int of_platform_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
> > >                  if (of_node_check_flag(rd->dn, OF_POPULATED))
> > >                          return NOTIFY_OK;
> > > 
> > > -               /* pdev_parent may be NULL when no bus platform device */
> > > -               pdev_parent = of_find_device_by_node(rd->dn->parent);
> > > -               pdev = of_platform_device_create(rd->dn, NULL,
> > > -                               pdev_parent ? &pdev_parent->dev : NULL);
> > > -               of_dev_put(pdev_parent);
> > > -
> > > -               if (pdev == NULL) {
> > > -                       pr_err("%s: failed to create for '%pOF'\n",
> > > -                                       __func__, rd->dn);
> > > -                       /* of_platform_device_create tosses the error code */
> > > -                       return notifier_from_errno(-EINVAL);
> > > +               if (of_device_is_compatible(rd->dn, "arm,primecell")) {
> > > +                       /* adev_p may be NULL when no bus amba device */
> > > +                       adev_p = of_find_amba_device_by_node(rd->dn->parent);
> > An amba_device can't ever have a parent that's an amba_device. The
> > parent of an amba_device is typically a platform_device for a
> > 'simple-bus'.
> 
> You are right. there is no parent device .
> I will remove it in v2.
> 
> > 
> > > +                       adev = of_amba_device_create(rd->dn, NULL, NULL,
> > > +                                       adev_p ? &adev_p->dev : NULL);
> > > +
> > > +                       if (adev_p)
> > > +                               put_device(&adev_p->dev);
> > > +
> > > +                       if (adev == NULL) {
> > > +                               pr_err("%s: failed to create for '%s'\n",
> > > +                                               __func__, rd->dn->full_name);
> > > +                               /* of_amba_device_create tosses the error */
> > > +                               return notifier_from_errno(-EINVAL);
> > > +                       }
> > > +               } else {
> > > +                       /* pdev_parent may be NULL when no bus platform device*/
> > > +                       pdev_parent = of_find_device_by_node(rd->dn->parent);
> > > +                       pdev = of_platform_device_create(rd->dn, NULL,
> > > +                                       pdev_parent ? &pdev_parent->dev : NULL);
> > > +                       of_dev_put(pdev_parent);
> > > +
> > > +                       if (pdev == NULL) {
> > > +                               pr_err("%s: failed to create for '%pOF'\n",
> > > +                                               __func__, rd->dn);
> > > +                               /* of_platform_device_create tosses the error */
> > > +                               return notifier_from_errno(-EINVAL);
> > > +                       }
> > This all pretty much duplicates what of_platform_bus_create() does and
> > we should use it here rather than have another copy. Plus what about
> > handling of any child devices (in the platform device case).
> 
> The code looks duplicated, but processed type of variable is
> different.(struct amba_device, struct platform_device)

of_platform_bus_create() works on both. Also, it handles some conditions 
not handled here.

Rob

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-11-06 13:11 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-10-25 16:39 [PATCH] of/platform: Support dynamic device tree on AMBA bus Jaewon Kim
2018-10-30 23:04 ` Frank Rowand
2018-10-31 15:32   ` Jaewon Kim
2018-10-31 16:06     ` Frank Rowand
2018-11-01 15:36       ` Jaewon Kim
2018-10-31 18:31 ` Rob Herring
     [not found]   ` <1f7b35fd-7900-0c48-50a2-4f84481a208c@gmail.com>
2018-11-06 13:11     ` Rob Herring

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).