LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Amit Shah <amit@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>, stable@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] virtio_console: free buffers after reset Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 10:40:18 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <27e87df7-2835-7f3e-c3da-76b844dbd780@redhat.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1524248223-393618-4-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> On 2018年04月21日 02:18, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Console driver is out of spec. The spec says: > A driver MUST NOT decrement the available idx on a live > virtqueue (ie. there is no way to “unexpose” buffers). > and it does exactly that by trying to detach unused buffers > without doing a device reset first. > > Defer detaching the buffers until device unplug. > > Of course this means we might get an interrupt for > a vq without an attached port now. Handle that by > discarding the consumed buffer. > > Reported-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com> > Fixes: b3258ff1d6 ("virtio: Decrement avail idx on buffer detach") > CC: stable@kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> I wonder whether or not we can have some BUG_ON() in virtqueue_detach_unused_buf() to detect such bugs (e.g by checking status?). Thanks > --- > drivers/char/virtio_console.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c > index 3e56f32..26a66ff 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c > +++ b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c > @@ -1402,7 +1402,6 @@ static int add_port(struct ports_device *portdev, u32 id) > { > char debugfs_name[16]; > struct port *port; > - struct port_buffer *buf; > dev_t devt; > unsigned int nr_added_bufs; > int err; > @@ -1513,8 +1512,6 @@ static int add_port(struct ports_device *portdev, u32 id) > return 0; > > free_inbufs: > - while ((buf = virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(port->in_vq))) > - free_buf(buf, true); > free_device: > device_destroy(pdrvdata.class, port->dev->devt); > free_cdev: > @@ -1539,34 +1536,14 @@ static void remove_port(struct kref *kref) > > static void remove_port_data(struct port *port) > { > - struct port_buffer *buf; > - > spin_lock_irq(&port->inbuf_lock); > /* Remove unused data this port might have received. */ > discard_port_data(port); > spin_unlock_irq(&port->inbuf_lock); > > - /* Remove buffers we queued up for the Host to send us data in. */ > - do { > - spin_lock_irq(&port->inbuf_lock); > - buf = virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(port->in_vq); > - spin_unlock_irq(&port->inbuf_lock); > - if (buf) > - free_buf(buf, true); > - } while (buf); > - > spin_lock_irq(&port->outvq_lock); > reclaim_consumed_buffers(port); > spin_unlock_irq(&port->outvq_lock); > - > - /* Free pending buffers from the out-queue. */ > - do { > - spin_lock_irq(&port->outvq_lock); > - buf = virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(port->out_vq); > - spin_unlock_irq(&port->outvq_lock); > - if (buf) > - free_buf(buf, true); > - } while (buf); > } > > /* > @@ -1791,13 +1768,24 @@ static void control_work_handler(struct work_struct *work) > spin_unlock(&portdev->c_ivq_lock); > } > > +static void flush_bufs(struct virtqueue *vq, bool can_sleep) > +{ > + struct port_buffer *buf; > + unsigned int len; > + > + while ((buf = virtqueue_get_buf(vq, &len))) > + free_buf(buf, can_sleep); > +} > + > static void out_intr(struct virtqueue *vq) > { > struct port *port; > > port = find_port_by_vq(vq->vdev->priv, vq); > - if (!port) > + if (!port) { > + flush_bufs(vq, false); > return; > + } > > wake_up_interruptible(&port->waitqueue); > } > @@ -1808,8 +1796,10 @@ static void in_intr(struct virtqueue *vq) > unsigned long flags; > > port = find_port_by_vq(vq->vdev->priv, vq); > - if (!port) > + if (!port) { > + flush_bufs(vq, false); > return; > + } > > spin_lock_irqsave(&port->inbuf_lock, flags); > port->inbuf = get_inbuf(port); > @@ -1984,6 +1974,15 @@ static const struct file_operations portdev_fops = { > > static void remove_vqs(struct ports_device *portdev) > { > + struct virtqueue *vq; > + > + virtio_device_for_each_vq(portdev->vdev, vq) { > + struct port_buffer *buf; > + > + flush_bufs(vq, true); > + while ((buf = virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(vq))) > + free_buf(buf, true); > + } > portdev->vdev->config->del_vqs(portdev->vdev); > kfree(portdev->in_vqs); > kfree(portdev->out_vqs);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-24 2:40 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2018-04-20 18:18 [PATCH 0/6] virtio-console: spec compliance fixes Michael S. Tsirkin 2018-04-20 18:18 ` [PATCH 1/6] virtio_console: don't tie bufs to a vq Michael S. Tsirkin 2018-04-21 7:30 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 2018-04-24 18:56 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2018-04-25 5:50 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 2018-04-20 18:18 ` [PATCH 3/6] virtio_console: free buffers after reset Michael S. Tsirkin 2018-04-24 2:40 ` Jason Wang [this message] 2018-04-20 18:18 ` [PATCH 2/6] virtio: add ability to iterate over vqs Michael S. Tsirkin 2018-04-20 18:18 ` [PATCH 4/6] virtio_console: drop custom control queue cleanup Michael S. Tsirkin 2018-04-20 18:18 ` [PATCH 5/6] virtio_console: move removal code Michael S. Tsirkin 2018-04-20 18:18 ` [PATCH 6/6] virtio_console: reset on out of memory Michael S. Tsirkin 2018-04-24 18:41 ` [PATCH 0/6] virtio-console: spec compliance fixes Michael S. Tsirkin 2018-04-25 14:01 ` Amit Shah 2018-05-03 3:34 ` Amit Shah 2018-05-03 3:45 ` Amit Shah 2018-05-03 19:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2018-05-06 17:56 ` Amit Shah 2018-05-06 18:24 ` Amit Shah 2018-05-06 19:52 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=27e87df7-2835-7f3e-c3da-76b844dbd780@redhat.com \ --to=jasowang@redhat.com \ --cc=amit@kernel.org \ --cc=arnd@arndb.de \ --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mst@redhat.com \ --cc=stable@kernel.org \ --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=tiwei.bie@intel.com \ --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).