LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: greybus: Use gpio_is_valid()
Date: Wed, 2 May 2018 15:15:05 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2aa263ef-1bbc-69fc-c007-303e59517081@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180502084308.GF2285@localhost>



On Wednesday 02 May 2018 02:13 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 10:05:39AM +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote:
>> Replace the manual validity checks for the GPIO with the
>> gpio_is_valid().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> chnage in v2 :
>>               Returning invalid gpio as error instead of -ENODEV.
>>
>>   drivers/staging/greybus/arche-platform.c | 6 +++---
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/arche-platform.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/arche-platform.c
>> index 83254a7..c3a7da5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/arche-platform.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/arche-platform.c
>> @@ -448,7 +448,7 @@ static int arche_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>   	arche_pdata->svc_reset_gpio = of_get_named_gpio(np,
>>   							"svc,reset-gpio",
>>   							0);
>> -	if (arche_pdata->svc_reset_gpio < 0) {
>> +	if (!gpio_is_valid(arche_pdata->svc_reset_gpio)) {
>>   		dev_err(dev, "failed to get reset-gpio\n");
>>   		return arche_pdata->svc_reset_gpio;
> I'm sorry, but I don't this change is desirable. of_get_named_gpio()
> returns a valid gpio number or a negative errno, so there's no need to
> use the legacy gpio_is_valid() helper here.
>
> If you grep for of_get_named_gpio() you'll find that some drivers indeed
> use that helper this way, but they are in a clear minority.
>
> And ultimately, we want to move to using gpio descriptors anyway.

We need to check gpio validity. If we are using of_get_named_gpio() or not.
of_get_name_gpio() will read a device node and fetch the value. But 
it'll not
check that gpio is valid or not valid.
>
>>   	}
>> @@ -468,7 +468,7 @@ static int arche_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>   	arche_pdata->svc_sysboot_gpio = of_get_named_gpio(np,
>>   							  "svc,sysboot-gpio",
>>   							  0);
>> -	if (arche_pdata->svc_sysboot_gpio < 0) {
>> +	if (!gpio_is_valid(arche_pdata->svc_sysboot_gpio)) {
>>   		dev_err(dev, "failed to get sysboot gpio\n");
>>   		return arche_pdata->svc_sysboot_gpio;
>>   	}
>> @@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ static int arche_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>   	arche_pdata->svc_refclk_req = of_get_named_gpio(np,
>>   							"svc,refclk-req-gpio",
>>   							0);
>> -	if (arche_pdata->svc_refclk_req < 0) {
>> +	if (!gpio_is_valid(arche_pdata->svc_refclk_req)) {
>>   		dev_err(dev, "failed to get svc clock-req gpio\n");
>>   		return arche_pdata->svc_refclk_req;
>>   	}
> But if this were to be changed, you'd need to update also the fourth
> call to of_get_named_gpio() in this function.

Sorry, I missed it. Thanks for point out. I will add check for this.

~arvind
>
> Thanks,
> Johan

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-02  9:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-28  4:35 Arvind Yadav
2018-04-28 19:58 ` [greybus-dev] " Alex Elder
2018-05-02  5:44 ` Viresh Kumar
2018-05-02  8:43 ` Johan Hovold
2018-05-02  9:45   ` Arvind Yadav [this message]
2018-05-02  9:57     ` Johan Hovold
2018-05-02 10:50       ` Arvind Yadav

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2aa263ef-1bbc-69fc-c007-303e59517081@gmail.com \
    --to=arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=johan@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v2] staging: greybus: Use gpio_is_valid()' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).