LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ray Lee" <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
To: "Asbjorn Sannes" <asbjorsa@ifi.uio.no>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Unpredictable performance
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 09:16:54 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2c0942db0801250916v6b1f988fre454dd7e33d7985@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4799C8E8.9060501@ifi.uio.no>
On Jan 25, 2008 3:32 AM, Asbjorn Sannes <asbjorsa@ifi.uio.no> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am experiencing unpredictable results with the following test
> without other processes running (exception is udev, I believe):
> cd /usr/src/test
> tar -jxf ../linux-2.6.22.12
> cp ../working-config linux-2.6.22.12/.config
> cd linux-2.6.22.12
> make oldconfig
> time make -j3 > /dev/null # This is what I note down as a "test" result
> cd /usr/src ; umount /usr/src/test ; mkfs.ext3 /dev/cc/test
> and then reboot
>
> The kernel is booted with the parameter mem=81920000
>
> For 2.6.23.14 the results vary from (real time) 33m30.551s to 45m32.703s
> (30 runs)
> For 2.6.23.14 with nop i/o scheduler from 29m8.827s to 55m36.744s (24 runs)
> For 2.6.22.14 also varied a lot.. but, lost results :(
> For 2.6.20.21 only vary from 34m32.054s to 38m1.928s (10 runs)
>
> Any idea of what can cause this? I have tried to make the runs as equal
> as possible, rebooting between each run.. i/o scheduler is cfq as default.
>
> sys and user time only varies a couple of seconds.. and the order of
> when it is "fast" and when it is "slow" is completly random, but it
> seems that the results are mostly concentrated around the mean.
First off, not all tests are good tests. In particular, small timing
differences can get magnified horrendously by heading into swap.
That said, do you have the means and standard deviations of those
runs? That's a good way to tell whether the tests are converging or
not, and whether your results are telling you anything.
Also as you're on a uniprocessor system, make -j2 is probably going to
be faster than make -j3. Perhaps immaterial to whatever you're trying
to test, but there you go.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-25 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-25 11:32 Asbjorn Sannes
2008-01-25 14:00 ` Nick Piggin
2008-01-25 14:31 ` Asbjørn Sannes
2008-01-25 15:03 ` Asbjørn Sannes
2008-01-26 0:38 ` Nick Piggin
2008-01-28 9:12 ` Asbjørn Sannes
2008-01-25 17:16 ` Ray Lee [this message]
2008-01-25 20:49 ` Asbjørn Sannes
[not found] ` <2c0942db0801251332k43e0b7d5xa012227f19ac4983@mail.gmail.com>
2008-01-28 9:02 ` Asbjørn Sannes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2c0942db0801250916v6b1f988fre454dd7e33d7985@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ray-lk@madrabbit.org \
--cc=asbjorsa@ifi.uio.no \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--subject='Re: Unpredictable performance' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).